Jump to content

PN-G Going To The Spread!!!!!


Guest Indian Chief

Recommended Posts

Why does everyone think you have to have blazing speed for the spread to work. Not comparing teams, but SLC was never an overall fast team, but the skill guys ran thier routes and the QB made smart decisions. Let's see what they do before you start bad mouthing them. I have to question the speed people are talking about though. Unless Hemmings got extremly faster since last season, I don't see him running faster than a 4.6 in the forty, but who needs the speed when he'll plow over you. Iknow there is several underclassmen coming through the system that can throw the ball though.  I say first play this year will be a triple reverse flea flicker option pass to the center on a go route. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest 87CRU79

I saw clips of PNG running the "Spread" on the news. It is almost as if PNG's QB, Tatum, is lined up in the Pistol formation (when the QB is only 3 yards away from the center, instead of the traditional Shotgun which is 5 yards) flexed by his FB and TB and running the usual PNG toss sweep. So is PNG now running the toss sweep out of the gun, or have they actually moved to the Spread?

If I recall, PNG has run the toss sweep out of the Wing T before they began running it out of the Pro Set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

two 4.4's and and 4.59 full back...

that seems quite unbelievable to me. I would much prefer to see it myself.

If you want to see it for yourself then you might purchase season tickets to the PNG games. LOL I'm jsut joking with you H J. On the 1997 Bridge City team they ran the wing T and in their back field they had Bryan Bock, Sam Carpenter, and Hoffphire (SP) I can't remember his first name. All three of them were blazing fast. I would think they all ran 4.4's and 4.5's. There was four break away touchdowns by BC in a game against PNG. I would say around 40 yards or more. Maybe someone can remember the facts better than I can. PNG won the game 27-26. Maybe the best high school game I have ever seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all due respect, none of those guys at BC that year ran a 4.4. Bock was a big kid, and if he had run a 4.4 he'd have played at UT or A&M instead of Howard Payne. They weren't even close to Beasley's speed, which was closer to 4.5. Charles ran a legit 4.4, as did Kerry Franks.

A lot of people mistake quickness for speed.

Those guys for BC were pretty good, but not close to 4.4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw Bock play several times, and he was an above average HS running back, but I would have been stunned to see him at a D1 school. Micah Mosely barely got in D1, and he was a far superior back. Bock still had some bugs in his game (three fumbles vs. WO-S his JR year) but was a good power runner - not spectacular, but very good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all due respect, none of those guys at BC that year ran a 4.4. Bock was a big kid, and if he had run a 4.4 he'd have played at UT or A&M instead of Howard Payne. They weren't even close to Beasley's speed, which was closer to 4.5. Charles ran a legit 4.4, as did Kerry Franks.

A lot of people mistake quickness for speed.

Those guys for BC were pretty good, but not close to 4.4.

I always laugh when the PN-G's of the world fanatics boast of all this so-called 'speed' their players posses.  My question is, if all this speed exist, wheres the 4x100, 4x200, etc relay teams?  The only kid I know that could run with guys like Franks was that kid from Vidor.  He finished 3rd in the 100 behind Chopper and Franks.  Everybody else is just full of it.  Stop hyping those kids up on the net and just let them play......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was at the game also and I remeber him having several fumbles. It was more like the ball was striped from him rather than him just mishandling the ball. The ball was strippped from a BC receiver last year against Lumberton which cost BC the game. I don't know if Bock wasn't coached on how to protect the ball or not. Stripping is a part of the game and WOS is good at it. Bock was a much better back his senior year and did not fumble near as much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined



  • Posts

    • naw, maaaaybe 7, definitely not 8 deep.  today im avoiding sitting by #10s parents, had to move away yesterday.   "put my son back in jub, put my son back in"  and then crying on every little touch of someone.    lets ball out today ktz!    
    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...