Jump to content

WHAT IS EVERYBODYS PREDICTION ON JASPER THIS YEAR, TALLENT, SIZE,STRENGH COMPAR


Recommended Posts

They might contend for a playoff spot, but probably lose a few big games. I think it's unlikely that they'll be in the top three, but it's not out of the question. Jasper always has size and talent, but they have rarely used them to their fullest potential. If players can pass their English classes (;)) and treat Coach Brooks' advice like scripture, then they'll probably be up there in district with the top teams on an almost yearly basis. I think any team that goes through what Jasper did last year has to go through at least a year under a new coach before they shock the world, so I don't think this is the year to go all in on Jasper. Next year, they should be very strong - but so should WO-S and several others. I still like WO-S next year (2008), but Jasper will have a strong and experienced QB/WR tandem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest ballfan

They are definetily in the hunt. I really like the way coach brooks is doin things in jasper. and ty quick is a great new offensive coordinator. And they can actually throw the ball this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IT WAS A COACHING PROBLEM THOUGH! WE HAD THE TALLENT WE HAD THE SPEED JUST AFTER 2 OR 3 QUARTERS OF STARTING BOTH WAYS ITS HARD TO STAY WINDED!! [move] >:(COACH LAUVE[/move]

Coach Lauve =

State Semi finals 2002

State Semi finals 2003

State Championship Game 2004

Not too mention 2 rings as a coordinator

You probably shouldn't be calling out your ex-coach. Stick to football, I'm sure your coaching staff wouldn't be pleased if they new you were on the boards talking it up!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

To 3AFan even Coach Lauve said he could have done more to help that team do better.So he was part of the problem for that team.The kids did not want to play for him cause of the way they were being done.I got that for some of the players mouth themselves. But Coach love did have some good years here in Jasper that for sure,but it was time for a change and we are lucky to have coach Brooks back.Jasper has done better than most though I think we make it 3 round that's a big hope but i love my BULLDOGS Class of 95 all day.GO BULLDOGS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • naw, maaaaybe 7, definitely not 8 deep.  today im avoiding sitting by #10s parents, had to move away yesterday.   "put my son back in jub, put my son back in"  and then crying on every little touch of someone.    lets ball out today ktz!    
    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McnNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an easy and obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...