Jump to content

PAM/Central Scrimmage Results!


Recommended Posts

Central won overall 7-4. Central outscored Memorial 6-2 in the controlled part of the scrimage. They played a half with a running clock and Memorial had a 2-1 advantage. Memorial scored on two screens. Charlie thomas did have an eighty run TD run. Derrick Hall got started when he was put at QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think PAM scored during the controled part of the scrimmage.  Part of the problem was playing Revulta(sp) and Alexander @QB instead of HBIV.  Also, they're running a Bear look on defense.(For those of you in MC who don't know football), 4 down, 2LB's, 1LB in the gap over the OT, single safety, Corners playing man.  I know it adds up to 10, but they were so close to the line of scrimmage, I couldn't find that 8th person in the box.  Now during game situation, PAM's O came alive with HBIV throwing 2 perfect screens(he allowed Central's Dline to come all the way before throwing) and the defense played as if they were fresh.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think PAM scored during the controled part of the scrimmage.  Part of the problem was playing Revulta(sp) and Alexander @QB instead of HBIV.  Also, they're running a Bear look on defense.(For those of you in MC who don't know football), 4 down, 2LB's, 1LB in the gap over the OT, single safety, Corners playing man.  I know it adds up to 10, but they were so close to the line of scrimmage, I couldn't find that 8th person in the box.  Now during game situation, PAM's O came alive with HBIV throwing 2 perfect screens(he allowed Central's Dline to come all the way before throwing) and the defense played as if they were fresh.....

How the WRs looking?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How the WRs looking?

Didn't throw to them much with success.  HBIV had the most completions, Alexander would either just throw to the left or roll out and throw back to the middle of the field.  Revulta(sp) arm looked weak...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this an unbias quoate. 85 is a jag lover more than a PAM lover.sounds like game time they came together??? what about the rb spot??? did the transfer kid look good???

I love all of the hood.  You're beginning to sound like a MC poser.  Anyway, the RB's are still light in the back side.  I couldn't tell who was who since PAM wore numberless jerseys.  They don't hit the hole hard enough for me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  Also, they're running a Bear look on defense.(For those of you in MC who don't know football), 4 down, 2LB's, 1LB in the gap over the OT, single safety, Corners playing man. 

Are you talking about the "Bear Defense" that's usually called a "46"?  Which is called a "46" because Buddy Ryan named it after Doug Plank who wore number 46 and was the strong safety on those Chicago Bears teams when Ryan was the DC and developed the defense?  That "Bear D"?  Thanks for enlightening this person from MC who marvels at your infinite wisdom about all things football.  ::)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you talking about the "Bear Defense" that's usually called a "46"?  Which is called a "46" because Buddy Ryan named it after Doug Plank who wore number 46 and was the strong safety on those Chicago Bears teams when Ryan was the DC and developed the defense?  That "Bear D"?  Thanks for enlightening this person from MC who marvels at your infinite wisdom about all things football.   ::)

I'll take name that defense after footballplayers for 200 Alex.....

Glad you know some trivia and yes I was referring to Buddy Ryans invention.  After talking to a Coach friend of mine, he said they were probably and this is his term, Double Eagle.  Nevertheless, they had 8 in the box playing man on the corners.  At times---well during game situation, it worked

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll take name that defense after footballplayers for 200 Alex.....

Glad you know some trivia and yes I was referring to Buddy Ryans invention.  After talking to a Coach friend of mine, he said they were probably and this is his term, Double Eagle.  Nevertheless, they had 8 in the box playing man on the corners.  At times---well during game situation, it worked

Have you seen Dayton's D?  A nose, two 3's, weak end, strong end, and the backers stacked over the tackles, with a cover 3 or man-free look in the secondary...  It's tough to prep for since no one else around here runs anything similar.

The problem with the 46 and Double Eagle - which in some circles is a ghost 7 and 4i on the weak side with a strong shade and 4i on the strong side with a 7 or a 9 - is that there are waaaaay too many adjustments when you face a four-wide team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • naw, maaaaybe 7, definitely not 8 deep.  today im avoiding sitting by #10s parents, had to move away yesterday.   "put my son back in jub, put my son back in"  and then crying on every little touch of someone.    lets ball out today ktz!    
    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McnNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an easy and obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...