Jump to content

Mask - Wear Them or Not


Hagar

Recommended Posts

How does this "government by decree" square with the Constitution? Ā  I know the Constitution is violated every day.Ā  One of the most egregious acts is against the 10th Amendment.Ā 

I threw in the Voting Rights Act if they are requiring mask to vote!

Fourteenth Amendment

Ā 

Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Ā 

Ā 

Voting Rights Act of 1965

Section 11(a) prohibits any person acting under color of law from refusing or failing to allow a qualified person to vote or to count a qualified voter's ballot. Similarly, Section 11(b) prohibits any person from intimidating, harassing, or coercing another person for voting or attempting to vote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Reagan said:

How does this "government by decree" square with the Constitution? Ā  I know the Constitution is violated every day.Ā  One of the most egregious acts is against the 10th Amendment.Ā 

I threw in the Voting Rights Act if they are requiring mask to vote!

Fourteenth Amendment

Ā 

Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Ā 

Ā 

Voting Rights Act of 1965

Section 11(a) prohibits any person acting under color of law from refusing or failing to allow a qualified person to vote or to count a qualified voter's ballot. Similarly, Section 11(b) prohibits any person from intimidating, harassing, or coercing another person for voting or attempting to vote.

My son turns 18 just a few days before Election Day; however you had to register to vote 30 days in advance. He didnā€™t. As a minor, I donā€™t even know if he could. He wonā€™t get to vote due to Texasā€™s registration requirements.Ā 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/22/2020 at 2:18 PM, Realville said:

Ā 

Ā 

This man has no notes or teleprompter. He speaks from his soul.

Saw a man in a store wearing no mask. Didnā€™t bother me at all that he wasnā€™t. He was wearing a shirt that said, ā€œ This country was not foundedĀ by fearful people.ā€ I totally agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/14/2020 at 9:32 AM, Big girl said:

I agree. If i have heart disease, and i die in a car accident, the accident killed me, not the heart disease

UNLESS, you have a heart attack while driving and die. Then you could even blame it on frito pie, spicy chicken wangs, or chocolate malt. The possibilities are endless.Ā 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/23/2020 at 3:13 PM, baddog said:

My wife says this affects patrons too. True or no? How can I eat with a mask on? Never mind, I refuse to be forced to wear one. Call me crazy.

Do you have a problem with businesses saying"no shoes, no shirt, no service"? Do you feel like they are infringing on your constitutional rights by forcing you to wear those items.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Itā€™s behind a paywall but hereā€™s Baytown Sunā€™s story on it. Ā It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think youā€™ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024 Ā  In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A studentā€™s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating ā€œsuper teamsā€ with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesnā€™t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. ā€œIf a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,ā€ the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Ā 
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Ā  GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...