Jump to content

Portland Has Fallen: Over 150 Shots Fired In The Democrat ‘Controlled’ City Over Night!


Recommended Posts

Posted
37 minutes ago, Setx fan said:

Whenever someone finds some solid evidence that Donavan or someone in close range of him was rioting or being violent the night he was shot let me know. He threw the canister away from him. The canister landed no where near the police. Did the police have a reason to throw it at him in the first place? And as far as the aftermath of Donavan being shot I am already aware that things got worse. That’s the point I’ve been making. Thanks for the video to prove that 

Donavan should have stayed home!!

Posted
2 hours ago, Setx fan said:

Whenever someone finds some solid evidence that Donavan or someone in close range of him was rioting or being violent the night he was shot let me know. He threw the canister away from him. The canister landed no where near the police. Did the police have a reason to throw it at him in the first place? And as far as the aftermath of Donavan being shot I am already aware that things got worse. That’s the point I’ve been making. Thanks for the video to prove that 

If the police tell you to leave and you do not, then the police shoot a tear gas canister in your direction to try once again to get you to leave the area, then you pick up the canister and lob it back towards the cops, you should be thankful that they weren’t using live ammo. 
Once he picked that canister up, all bets were off. If people have been assaulting cops in that area for days, then you decide to go down and take part in the fun.... well, you get what you get. That’s just how it works in the real world. 
It’s funny how y’all all want to be socialists (speaking of your generation) but I was around when the socialists were running people down in China. Not people who were throwing stuff at the cops. Just for blocking the street. I’ve seen injustice. This isn’t it. 

Posted
1 minute ago, CardinalBacker said:

If the police tell you to leave and you do not, then the police shoot a tear gas canister in your direction to try once again to get you to leave the area, then you pick up the canister and lob it back towards the cops, you should be thankful that they weren’t using live ammo. 
Once he picked that canister up, all bets were off. If people have been assaulting cops in that area for days, then you decide to go down and take part in the fun.... well, you get what you get. That’s just how it works in the real world. 
It’s funny how y’all all want to be socialists (speaking of your generation) but I was around when the socialists were running people down in China. Not people who were throwing stuff at the cops. Just for blocking the street. I’ve seen injustice. This isn’t it. 

My point is the Feds didn’t make the situation better. In fact they made it worse. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Setx fan said:

My point is the Feds didn’t make the situation better. In fact they made it worse. 

Did you watch the clip? Those “peaceful protestors“ were trying to burn down the federal building with that guards inside. That’s when they sent in the federal reinforcements. There have been federal officers there forever.  The rioting forced them to bring in more because the city wouldn’t control the situation. You haven’t seen feds out and about. They’re specifically protecting federal property. 

Posted
21 minutes ago, Setx fan said:

My point is the Feds didn’t make the situation better. In fact they made it worse. 

If these idiots go home and try to be productive members of society, then there would be no need for the heightened police presence!!  I guess as long as they are getting $600 a week from the government, no need to try to be productive.

Posted
19 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

Did you watch the clip? Those “peaceful protestors“ were trying to burn down the federal building with that guards inside. That’s when they sent in the federal reinforcements. There have been federal officers there forever.  The rioting forced them to bring in more because the city wouldn’t control the situation. You haven’t seen feds out and about. They’re specifically protecting federal property. 

Did you watch the clip? Those were federal officers inside the building? The feds arrived July 4 and left near the end of July. The rioting was actually dwindling down but not completely stopping fast enough for some before then. When the feds arrived things cranked back up. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Setx fan said:

Did you watch the clip? Those were federal officers inside the building? The feds arrived July 4 and left near the end of July. The rioting was actually dwindling down but not completely stopping fast enough for some before then. When the feds arrived things cranked back up. 

Should  rioting be allowed to "dwindle down" ( also, how, exactly did you know the rate of the "dwindle") or should it be terminated because it is wrong and there is no need for further property or human damage?  Why do you have no interest in  police shooting of minorities being allowed to "dwindle down"?

Posted
16 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said:

If these idiots go home and try to be productive members of society, then there would be no need for the heightened police presence!!  I guess as long as they are getting $600 a week from the government, no need to try to be productive.

Isnt it ironic that you are attacking the mouth that feeds you?

Posted
3 minutes ago, Setx fan said:

Did you watch the clip? Those were federal officers inside the building? The feds arrived July 4 and left near the end of July. The rioting was actually dwindling down but not completely stopping fast enough for some before then. When the feds arrived things cranked back up. 

Maybe the thugs were trying to goad the police into something, just to further theirs and the dims narrative.

Posted
1 minute ago, Setx fan said:

Did you watch the clip? Those were federal officers inside the building? The feds arrived July 4 and left near the end of July. The rioting was actually dwindling down but not completely stopping fast enough for some before then. When the feds arrived things cranked back up. 

I’m sorry, my friend. We’ve all got a right to peacefully protest. Nobody has a right to riot. Not even once. Definitely not for an entire month.  
This fallacy of “well, they should just let the protestors get it all out of their system and then we’ll rebuild” is garbage.  
This crap will keep happening every time the left is unhappy (because the right doesn’t riot) until they hit the rioters so hard that they never want to do it again. 

Posted
1 minute ago, stevenash said:

Should  rioting be allowed to "dwindle down" ( also, how, exactly did you know the rate of the "dwindle") or should it be terminated because it is wrong and there is no need for further property or human damage?  Why do you have no interest in  police shooting of minorities being allowed to "dwindle down"?

Ideally you would want it to completely stop as soon as possible but it doesnt always work that way

Posted
12 minutes ago, Setx fan said:

Ideally you would want it to completely stop as soon as possible but it doesnt always work that way

If you want it to stop ASAP,  is "allowing it to dwindle" an appropriate solution? If you are a police officer and I am one of the "dwindlers" and you tell me to leave the area and I respond by spitting in your face, do you have justification to respond?

Posted
1 hour ago, stevenash said:

If you want it to stop ASAP,  is "allowing it to dwindle" an appropriate solution? If you are a police officer and I am one of the "dwindlers" and you tell me to leave the area and I respond by spitting in your face, do you have justification to respond?

I can’t make you understand my point. Just sleep on it and if that doesn’t work just forget about it 

Posted

No need to sleep.  I think I understood your point.  You were suggesting /implying that, since the riots were dwindling, they should just be allowed to continue to dwindle.  A riot is a riot is a riot.  It needs to be stopped.   This country has some rules/laws that need to be followed.   Permitting some to break those laws emboldens them to break more of them more often thus putting lives and property at additional risk.

Posted
26 minutes ago, stevenash said:

No need to sleep.  I think I understood your point.  You were suggesting /implying that, since the riots were dwindling, they should just be allowed to continue to dwindle.  A riot is a riot is a riot.  It needs to be stopped.   This country has some rules/laws that need to be followed.   Permitting some to break those laws emboldens them to break more of them more often thus putting lives and property at additional risk.

 

44 minutes ago, Setx fan said:

I can’t make you understand my point. Just sleep on it and if that doesn’t work just forget about it 

Sleep on it

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,283
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Malachi
    Newest Member
    Malachi
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...