Jump to content

SETXsports.com HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL RANKINGS - 4A/3A WEEK 3

WOSgrad

By WOSgrad
in High School Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

WOSgrad

WOSgrad

Posted
Posted

small.jpg.01e26211289b94a5e809283d015d57

2020 HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL RANKINGS

WEEK 3

6A/5A Rankings

Rank, School, Pts., Prev, Next Opponent

1.   Galena Park North Shore (0-0) (10), 100, NA, 9/25 vs. Alvin Shadow Creek

2.   Atascocita (0-0), 97, NA, 9/24 at Klein Collins

3.   Beaumont West Brook (0-0), 68, NA, 10/2 at Tomball Memorial

3.   Lufkin (0-0), 68, NA, 9/25 at Tyler Legacy

5.   College Station (0-0), 60, NA, 9/25 vs. Hutto

6.   Barbers Hill (0-0), 54, NA, 9/26 at Katy Paetow

7.   Friendswood (0-0), 44, NA, 9/24 at Humble Summer Creek

8.   Crosby (0-0), 35, NA, 9/24 at Richmond George Ranch

9.   Port Neches-Groves (0-0), NA, 9/25 at Port Arthur Memorial

10. Beaumont United (0-0), NA, 10/2 vs. #9 Port Neches-Groves

Others receiving votes: Humble 12, Port Arthur Memorial 10, Magnolia 7, Nederland 4, Humble Summer Creek 2

4A/3A Rankings

Rank, School, Pts., Prev, Next Opponent

1.   Carthage (1-0) (10), 100, 1, 9/25 at Gilmer

2.   West Orange-Stark (0-0), 83, 2, 9/18 vs. #3 Newton

3.   Newton (0-0), 76, 3, 9/11 vs. Kirbyville

4.   Jasper (0-0), 71, 5, 9/18 at Hardin-Jefferson

5.   Silsbee (0-0), 64, 4, 9/11 vs. Lumberton

6.   East Chambers (1-0), 52, 6, 9/11 vs. Hamshire-Fannett

7.   Vidor (0-0), 37, 7, 9/11 vs. Brazosport

8.   Huffman Hargrave (2-0), 28, 9, 9/18 at Navasota

9.   Diboll (0-1), 17, 8, 9/11 vs. Liberty

10. Coldspring-Oakhurst (1-0), 12, 10, 9/11 vs. Shepherd

Others receiving votes: Little Cypress-Mauriceville 3, Anderson-Shiro 2, Lumberton 2, New Waverly 2, Hamshire-Fannett 1, Hemphill 1

2A-Private Rankings

Rank, School, Pts., Prev, Next Opponent

1.   San Augustine (0-0) (10), 100, 9/11 at Ekhart

2.   Joaquin (1-0), 86, 5, 9/11 at Groveton

3.   Tenaha (0-1), 71, 2, 9/11 at Kountze

4.   Calvert (1-1), 61, 6, 9/11 vs. Bastrop Tribe Consolidated

5.   Timpson (2-0), 55, NR, 9/11 vs. Mount Enterprise

6.   Oakwood (1-0), 47, 9, 9/11 vs. Trinidad

7.   Garrison (0-1), 43, 4, 9/11 vs. Arp

8.   Beaumont Monsignor Kelly (0-0), 27, 8, 9/25 vs. Cypress Christian

9.   Cushing (1-0), 23, NR, 9/11 at Burkeville

10. Lovelady (0-2), 17, 3, 9/11 vs. Iola

Others receiving votes: West Sabine 11, Evadale 6, Colmesneil 3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    46,207
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Separation Scientist
      Barbers Hill (28) vs La Porte (55) - FINAL

      By Separation Scientist · Posted

      That should tell everyone something pretty clearly. Does anyone really think BH is recruiting elementary kids, to get them to transfer in Jr. high? Seriously? Here is the "dirty little secret" about BH: Most people move to the district for a quality living environment to raise their young family, and benefit from the outstanding acedemics at BH. Even If all athlectics suddenly disappeared from BH, people would still want their kids in the district. If thats not enough to convince anyone, and BH really was determined to recruit, first step would be to have open enrollemnt. It is closed.        Yes, I get it, no one ever wants to give BH the benefit of the doubt on anything. Some of the accusations are beyond ridiculous though. This paranoia the BH critics are afflicted with is not just sad, its flat out laughable.     
    • setxathlete14
      Livingston Open

      By setxathlete14 · Posted

      Opting is always an option. Are they considering any BC assistants? Highly qualified after that season they put up. 
    • SmashMouth
      Waco La Vega (42) vs West Orange-Stark (20) - FINAL

      By SmashMouth · Posted

      Be that as it may, only time will tell. Hide and watch. Don’t be surprised if the next HC hire uses his own recipe. That happens more than not historically. I am not arguing the point that Hooks & CT had a winning combination that could’ve been carried over. I’m saying that finding someone to do that is not going to be as easy as one might think. Tell me again why Saban’s replacement, who even has Saban’s assistance if he wants it, just lost another game to an unranked team and has taken the Tide out of playoff contention? Why wouldn’t he just follow the success of possibly the greatest college football coach ever lived? 
    • WOSdrummer99
      Waco La Vega (42) vs West Orange-Stark (20) - FINAL

      By WOSdrummer99 · Posted

      We've acknowledged having 2 HOF coaches hasn't been like most other schools. So why everyone jumps to the conclusion it wouldn't work here is beyond my comprehension. I see it carry over with these other hires. Gilmer, Aledo, North Shore, Austin Westlake. Next man up that continues the system in place has instant success. Matter fact there was 2 rookie HC that won the state championship the same year we handed over the keys. Same book. Same recipe. Better ingredients.
    • Reagan
      Trump Wins

      By Reagan · Posted

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...