Jump to content

Leadership question for UT Alum


stevenash

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, stevenash said:

Do you think that another example of good leadership in California would have been to move some of the attention given to straws to forest management?

This is the hidden content, please

 

There’s your link.

National Forest (buck stops with trump) controls, and is responsible for maintaining 57% of California forests.

Private interests (the market) owns, and is responsible for maintaining 40% of California forests.

The State of California (buck stops with Newsom) owns a whopping 3% of California forests.

Want to rethink your question?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, stevenash said:

Wonder why the other surrounding states with large tracts of forests ( and I suspect a similar division between govt, private enterprise and state) dont have near the frequency of fires that California has?

Uh, population density, maybe?  Oregon, Washington, Idaho, and Nevada have combined 16.5 million people. California has 39.8 million. Need a link? 

1 hour ago, stevenash said:

Good leadership would have imposed some sort of restrictions on the private interests and state interests instead of allowing situation to worsen every year

Wait a minute - restrictions on private landowners? Your free market expounding self is gonna use that one? Oh, the depths to which you will descend to try and cast blame on a hated foe.

The state has direct jurisdiction over only 3% of 33,000,000 aces of forest. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, stevenash said:

No need for a link unless you have one that shows a direct corelation between population density and frequency of fires.  As for free market expounding, the state already has more regulations than any state in the union.   Figured you would think that was a great thing

Population and frequency are generally linked. Think auto accidents. Think virus spreads.
Also, the Pacific Northwest (Oregon, Washington)contains part of the world’s largest temperate rain forest. Climate is changing that, so we’ll see what the future holds. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, stevenash said:
Officials say at least 13 of the CA fires were started by downed power lines
Didn't know climate change can down power lines
 
I have not verified the above, but if it is true, the federal government is not likely the caretaker for any power lines.
 

In all honesty, the national forests aren't managed as they should be out west.  Groups like the Sierra Club file suits that are heard by left-leaning judges and stop work indefinitely, then you get nuts chaining themselves to trees and destroying equipment when you actually do get to start work.  

Wildfires are nature's way of managing the forest.  When we fail to manage the forest ourselves, we end up with wildfires.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, UT alum said:

This is the hidden content, please

 

There’s your link.

National Forest (buck stops with trump) controls, and is responsible for maintaining 57% of California forests.

Private interests (the market) owns, and is responsible for maintaining 40% of California forests.

The State of California (buck stops with Newsom) owns a whopping 3% of California forests.

Want to rethink your question?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...