Jump to content

My week 5 rankings


AggiesAreWe

Recommended Posts

Here are my week 5 rankings:

6A/5A

1. North Shore

2. Atascocita

3. College Station

4. Lufkin

5. Friendswood

6. West Brook

7. Barbers Hill

8. Crosby

9. PN-G

10. United

 

4A/3A

1. Carthage

2. WO-S

3. Jasper

4. East Chambers

5. Vidor

6. Huffman

7. Silsbee

8. Liberty

9. Woodville

10. Hamshire-Fannett

 

2A/Private

1. Joaquin

2. Timpson

3. Oakwood

4. Cushing

5. San Augustine

6. Tenaha

7. Calvert

8. Kelly

9. Colmesneil

10. Garrison

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mine:

6A/5A

1.   North Shore

2.   Atascocita

3.   Lufkin

4.   College Station

5.   West Brook

6.   Barbers Hill

7.   Crosby

8.   Friendswood

9.   Beaumont United

10. Port Arthur Memorial

4A/3A

1.    Carthage

2.    Jasper

3.     East Chambers

4.     West Orange-Stark

5.     Huffman Hargrave

6.     Silsbee

7.     Vidor

8.     Liberty

9.     Woodville

10.   Kirbyville

2A-Private

1.    Timpson

2.    Joaquin

3.    Tenaha

4.     Oakwood

5.     Cushing

6.     San Augustine

7.     Calvert

8.     Beaumont Kelly

9.     Colmesneil

10.   Beaumont Legacy Christian

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, wo-s#1 said:

Grad just for the heck can you explain your thoughts of putting those 2 ahead of WOS...just curious 

Sure.  Dropped WO-S to #6 due to their layoff. This week, I moved them up due to their victory over Newton. I'm working them back up.

EC is 3-0 and dominating their opponents. Jasper is 2-0 and, 1 half against H-J not withstanding, have done the same.

Yes, WO-S' win over Newton was impressive.  Heck, it even surprised me as I thought the Stangs would have more rust.

However, it is just my philosophy that I don't drop teams that are still winning. I have had Jasper ahead of them since preseason and I put EC ahead of them during the layoff and neither of those schools have done anything to warrant me dropping them.

If it is any consolation, with the votes that have come in so far, more agree with you than with me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WOSgrad said:

Sure.  Dropped WO-S to #6 due to their layoff. This week, I moved them up due to their victory over Newton. I'm working them back up.

EC is 3-0 and dominating their opponents. Jasper is 2-0 and, 1 half against H-J not withstanding, have done the same.

Yes, WO-S' win over Newton was impressive.  Heck, it even surprised me as I thought the Stangs would have more rust.

However, it is just my philosophy that I don't drop teams that are still winning. I have had Jasper ahead of them since preseason and I put EC ahead of them during the layoff and neither of those schools have done anything to warrant me dropping them.

If it is any consolation, with the votes that have come in so far, more agree with you than with me.

Sounds good to me,just wondering...I know y’all voters get hack all the time about everything and I wasn’t trying to start any of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,207
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • That should tell everyone something pretty clearly. Does anyone really think BH is recruiting elementary kids, to get them to transfer in Jr. high? Seriously? Here is the "dirty little secret" about BH: Most people move to the district for a quality living environment to raise their young family, and benefit from the outstanding acedemics at BH. Even If all athlectics suddenly disappeared from BH, people would still want their kids in the district. If thats not enough to convince anyone, and BH really was determined to recruit, first step would be to have open enrollemnt. It is closed.        Yes, I get it, no one ever wants to give BH the benefit of the doubt on anything. Some of the accusations are beyond ridiculous though. This paranoia the BH critics are afflicted with is not just sad, its flat out laughable.     
    • Opting is always an option. Are they considering any BC assistants? Highly qualified after that season they put up. 
    • Be that as it may, only time will tell. Hide and watch. Don’t be surprised if the next HC hire uses his own recipe. That happens more than not historically. I am not arguing the point that Hooks & CT had a winning combination that could’ve been carried over. I’m saying that finding someone to do that is not going to be as easy as one might think. Tell me again why Saban’s replacement, who even has Saban’s assistance if he wants it, just lost another game to an unranked team and has taken the Tide out of playoff contention? Why wouldn’t he just follow the success of possibly the greatest college football coach ever lived? 
    • We've acknowledged having 2 HOF coaches hasn't been like most other schools. So why everyone jumps to the conclusion it wouldn't work here is beyond my comprehension. I see it carry over with these other hires. Gilmer, Aledo, North Shore, Austin Westlake. Next man up that continues the system in place has instant success. Matter fact there was 2 rookie HC that won the state championship the same year we handed over the keys. Same book. Same recipe. Better ingredients.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...