Jump to content

Language warning, woman arrested at HS football game

Boneyard Boys

By Boneyard Boys
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 123
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

AggiesAreWe
AggiesAreWe

Does one have the right to enter a store with no shoes and shirt and expect service when the sign on the door states "no shoes, no shirt, no service"?

RETIREDFAN1
RETIREDFAN1

A mandate dictated by a governor WITHOUT having gone through the legislative process is NOT a law and does not carry any weight at all......she will sue and she will win........

WOSdrummer99
WOSdrummer99

From the above article... “The governor and the (Ohio) health department have made it very clear that masks are required indoor and outdoor at sports facilities. They’re just part of the expectat

Realville

Realville

Posted
Posted
31 minutes ago, JasperDAWG said:

THIS I DO KNOW AS FACT! :

maskholes like the chick in the video no matter the state are/will gonna end up costing EVERYONE the opportunities of highschool sports.

Players,parents, fans  all will suffer when the mandates  for each state, community or district continue to "bucked" and the shot callers shut it down.

Think of the irony of calling this woman a mask hole who is sitting with her family socially distant from everyone around her not wearing a mask watching a middle school football game where you have football players out on the field down in the 3 point stance two feet from each about get in each other’s face an spit and grunt all over each other while not wearing a mask. This country has reached maximum capacity of stupidness!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Reagan

Reagan

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, tvc184 said:

I believe the US Supreme Court disagrees with you. 

BTW -- there are some on the Supreme Court that are Constitutionalist and then there are some that are activist.  So, it's not a given the outcome.  But -- when Trump gets another Constitutionalist on the court then hopefully the right thing would be done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tvc184

tvc184

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, Reagan said:

BTW -- there are some on the Supreme Court that are Constitutionalist and then there are some that are activist.  So, it's not a given the outcome.  But -- when Trump gets another Constitutionalist on the court then hopefully the right thing would be done.

You say a constitutionalist but SCOTUS ruled in favor of the 10th Amendment on states’ rights. You are for overturning that and have them let the federal dictate all of the rules?

All of the rulings that I have seen in reference to health have deferred these decisions to the state. I am assuming that you wanted RBG, Sotomayor and Kagan speakiy for you....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tvc184

tvc184

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Reagan said:

As with the "right" to an abortion -- exactly what law(s) were passed with that and what we are talking about?

You’ve gone from masks to abortion.

okayyyyy.....
 

Roe v. Wade said that a child that is not viable outside of the womb is a female right to privacy. Once the child can live outside of the womb, it is no longer a right.

 What you actually have is states making their own laws on abortion, not the federal government. Again, states’ rights. So I again assuming that you want Pelosi and Schumer telling Texas what to do  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Reagan

Reagan

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, tvc184 said:

You’ve gone from masks to abortion.

okayyyyy.....
 

Roe v. Wade said that a child that is not viable outside of the womb is a female right to privacy. Once the child can live outside of the womb, it is no longer a right.

 What you actually have is states making their own laws on abortion, not the federal government. Again, states’ rights. So I again assuming that you want Pelosi and Schumer telling Texas what to do  

You stated the ones "following the law!"  I am saying, again, what laws were passed?  Feel free to address either issue!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Reagan

Reagan

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, tvc184 said:

You’ve gone from masks to abortion.

okayyyyy.....
 

Roe v. Wade said that a child that is not viable outside of the womb is a female right to privacy. Once the child can live outside of the womb, it is no longer a right.

 What you actually have is states making their own laws on abortion, not the federal government. Again, states’ rights. So I again assuming that you want Pelosi and Schumer telling Texas what to do  

Come on -- Roe V Wade is NOT law!!!!   If you think it is -- what law is it that was passed.  Very simple question!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Boneyard Boys

Boneyard Boys

Posted
  • Author
Posted
36 minutes ago, Realville said:

This video should really bother a lot people. The draconian over reach in this situation is ridiculous. Anyone notice the cheerleaders on the track cheering at the end of the video with no mask on. I guess Paul Blart is going to arrest them after he’s finish with that lady. Good Grief!

I tried to find more video that showed she was doing something wrong but all I found was the beginning of the altercation. She was seated with her family away from everyone else. Only her people were around but they came and took her away because she wasn’t wearing a face covering. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Boneyard Boys

Boneyard Boys

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Upon further review I disagree with this decision. You can’t just look into the visitors stands and go arrest anyone who is not wearing a mask. Looks like she was singled out and targeted for removing her mask when she had the damn thing in her pocket. She’s seated in the middle of her family with about 5 people around, a bunch of them kids. Probably her kids, no other people within 10 feet of their group. Until the home team security guard decided he needed to protect the visiting crowd. He doesn’t look like a police officer to me, maybe a school cop. I’d be extremely pissed off and fight back too if you came at me like a mad man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Realville

Realville

Posted
Posted
Just now, Boneyard Boys said:

I tried to find more video that showed maybe she was doing something wrong but all I found was the beginning of the altercation. She was seated with her family away from everyone else. Only her people were there but they came and took her away because she wasn’t wearing a face covering. 

Like I said the cheerleaders on the track aren’t even wearing a mask. We know the the football players on the field aren’t wearing mask. The data out there just shows how stupid some people are to keep going along with this nonsense. It’s a manageable virus without the over reach. I am beyond calling people sheep at this point there just dumbasses that includes the individual on here calling people maskholes.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tvc184

tvc184

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Reagan said:

You stated the ones "following the law!"  I am saying, again, what laws were passed?  Feel free to address either issue!

The one that says the governor can issue criminal mandates.

 In this case from what I have read in current sites (and I believe that I made the same comment here or another forum), she was asked to leave the school property for not wearing a mask, she refused. She was trespassing. She then resisted arrest. Going by Texas law only as an example of what Ohio law may be similar to, you cannot even resist an unlawful arrest.

 So who would convict this woman? Any juror following the law.

 If it was in Texas, yes the mask is a criminal law. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    46,207
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Separation Scientist
      Barbers Hill (28) vs La Porte (55) - FINAL

      By Separation Scientist · Posted

      That should tell everyone something pretty clearly. Does anyone really think BH is recruiting elementary kids, to get them to transfer in Jr. high? Seriously? Here is the "dirty little secret" about BH: Most people move to the district for a quality living environment to raise their young family, and benefit from the outstanding acedemics at BH. Even If all athlectics suddenly disappeared from BH, people would still want their kids in the district. If thats not enough to convince anyone, and BH really was determined to recruit, first step would be to have open enrollemnt. It is closed.        Yes, I get it, no one ever wants to give BH the benefit of the doubt on anything. Some of the accusations are beyond ridiculous though. This paranoia the BH critics are afflicted with is not just sad, its flat out laughable.     
    • setxathlete14
      Livingston Open

      By setxathlete14 · Posted

      Opting is always an option. Are they considering any BC assistants? Highly qualified after that season they put up. 
    • SmashMouth
      Waco La Vega (42) vs West Orange-Stark (20) - FINAL

      By SmashMouth · Posted

      Be that as it may, only time will tell. Hide and watch. Don’t be surprised if the next HC hire uses his own recipe. That happens more than not historically. I am not arguing the point that Hooks & CT had a winning combination that could’ve been carried over. I’m saying that finding someone to do that is not going to be as easy as one might think. Tell me again why Saban’s replacement, who even has Saban’s assistance if he wants it, just lost another game to an unranked team and has taken the Tide out of playoff contention? Why wouldn’t he just follow the success of possibly the greatest college football coach ever lived? 
    • WOSdrummer99
      Waco La Vega (42) vs West Orange-Stark (20) - FINAL

      By WOSdrummer99 · Posted

      We've acknowledged having 2 HOF coaches hasn't been like most other schools. So why everyone jumps to the conclusion it wouldn't work here is beyond my comprehension. I see it carry over with these other hires. Gilmer, Aledo, North Shore, Austin Westlake. Next man up that continues the system in place has instant success. Matter fact there was 2 rookie HC that won the state championship the same year we handed over the keys. Same book. Same recipe. Better ingredients.
    • Reagan
      Trump Wins

      By Reagan · Posted

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...