Jump to content

Got it yet?


UT alum

Recommended Posts

The Master Carnival Barker and his posse of trained dogs and ponies got ya’ll all in a tizzy about his taxes. Who gives a rat’s patootie about that? Everyone should maximize the tax code to their advantage. Big deal. 
As a result, no one’s asking the bigger question:

Who in the hell is holding almost a half a billion in personally guaranteed notes due over the next four years?


The incompetent idiot burned through $400,000,000 he chiseled his fellow heirs out of from his daddy. He’s burned through another $400,000,000 or so he got from palling up with Mark Burnett. Now, he’s apparently burned through another $400,000,000 borrowed from unnamed sources probably not American, since he’s burned through the capital markets here with the zeal of an arsonist. 
 

Wouldn’t you like to know for sure that Putin’s not his co-signer this time around?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said:

The Dems are so enamored with Putin.  It’s no wonder, since Hillary and Obama used them in an attempt to falsely accuse Trump of misdeeds during the last election.  Dems need to take a hard look at who’s really in bed with the Russians!!

Brainwashed. The Barker rules!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, UT alum said:

The Master Carnival Barker and his posse of trained dogs and ponies got ya’ll all in a tizzy about his taxes. Who gives a rat’s patootie about that? Everyone should maximize the tax code to their advantage. Big deal. 
As a result, no one’s asking the bigger question:

Who in the hell is holding almost a half a billion in personally guaranteed notes due over the next four years?


The incompetent idiot burned through $400,000,000 he chiseled his fellow heirs out of from his daddy. He’s burned through another $400,000,000 or so he got from palling up with Mark Burnett. Now, he’s apparently burned through another $400,000,000 borrowed from unnamed sources probably not American, since he’s burned through the capital markets here with the zeal of an arsonist. 
 

Wouldn’t you like to know for sure that Putin’s not his co-signer this time around?

Do you have the same curiosity about 3.5 million to Hunter Biden from Russian?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SW1966 said:

UT alum, I agree with you.  There is legitimate concern Trump could be compromised by his debt and that this could negatively impact American security.  I care if a president of either part would do this, but most people only care if it is the other party.

But no concerns with Burisma, Ukraine, and payment to Hunter from Russia?  How convenient.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SW1966 said:

baddog, are you serious?  Several of you on here feed off one another - suckass back at you.

I don’t have to suck up to any of these guys.    I feed off of the truth. You deal with false accusations as being the truth. Huge difference. 
 

Wait a minute, here comes big girl with her “I agree” 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SW1966 said:

baddog, what you print is generally false information generated with an agenda by conservative media, and some of which is conspiracy crap by delusional people.  Your intense need to believe this crap seriously clouds your reasoning and judgment.

Outweighed by your intense need to classify anything from the right as propaganda.  You , of all people, are the LAST one who should appraise the reasoning and judgement of others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SW1966 said:

baddog, what you print is generally false information generated with an agenda by conservative media, and some of which is conspiracy crap by delusional people.  Your intense need to believe this crap seriously clouds your reasoning and judgment.

Show me what I have printed that is false. According to the liberal/socialist/communist manifesto, all I need to do is have accusations not backed by fact. You could attack a Supreme Court nominee or impeach a president with nothing more. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Belief in God is faith, based on spiritual apprehension rather than proof.   The Left’s God is the Democratic Party & MSM.   Again, based on a type of spiritual apprension rather than proof.   Therefore, Anonymous, or Unnamed sources information is true to the Left.   No proof required because it comes down from the Throne.   Why else would any normal human, with a functional mental capacity, continue to buy into this whole, “We ain’t got no proof, but by george it is true”.   For four years their Gods have been feeding them lies, but they continue to believe.  Fascinating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Realville said:

The UT stands for Useless Turd which is what his post is worth. Anonymous and Unnamed Sources go figure. If Trump is a incompetent idiot what does that make all the Democrats that got smoked by him to become President?

“Observe the side that resorts to the most vociferous name calling, and you are likely to have identified the side with the weaker argument, and they know it.” - Charles R. Anderson

trump only smoked one Democrat. He smoked fifteen republicans to get his first nomination. I say this as if facts really matter in your universe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Hagar said:

Belief in God is faith, based on spiritual apprehension rather than proof.   The Left’s God is the Democratic Party & MSM.   Again, based on a type of spiritual apprension rather than proof.   Therefore, Anonymous, or Unnamed sources information is true to the Left.   No proof required because it comes down from the Throne.   Why else would any normal human, with a functional mental capacity, continue to buy into this whole, “We ain’t got no proof, but by george it is true”.   For four years their Gods have been feeding them lies, but they continue to believe.  Fascinating.

So, you think the documents don’t exist? Physical reality no longer has bearing in truth? We got a case where the thing speaks for itself here, and you can only deny that the thing is real. The string of denial eventually, always, runs out. Your emperor has no clothes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

So, you think the documents don’t exist? Physical reality no longer has bearing in truth? We got a case where the thing speaks for itself here, and you can only deny that the thing is real. The string of denial eventually, always, runs out. Your emperor has no clothes.

Have you spent the last four years in a Tibetan Monastery?  The document is the Steele Dossier.  Yes, it exist, as does old issues of Mad Magazine.   Both equally factual.   The Atlantic story exist, but has no foundation.  Another fictional story.   Time after time the MSM, The Propaganda Arm of the DNC, puts out these ridiculous stories/accusations, and the Left laps them up like pigs at a trough.  Fool me once, shame on you.  Fool me twice, shame on me.  Yet the Left continues to be fooled.   It’s uncanny.  Makes zero sense.   One would think most folks with at least a double digit IQ would finally start to question them, but nope.

Need more proof?   Dan Rather had a document.  It existed.  He reported on it and was fired when the document was (again) proven to be a fake.   As someone a little older, take my advice.   Any derogatory News story that comes out about Trump between now and the election, assume they are false/fake.   Most, if not all, will be.  I respect your right to dislike Trump.  I’m not fond of Trump the man either.  But don’t buy into all the negative 🐂💩 from the MSM.   I don’t even trust most of the right wing news fully, and heaven knows they’re not as bad as the MSM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Hagar said:

Have you spent the last four years in a Tibetan Monastery?  The document is the Steele Dossier.  Yes, it exist, as does old issues of Mad Magazine.   Both equally factual.   The Atlantic story exist, but has no foundation.  Another fictional story.   Time after time the MSM, The Propaganda Arm of the DNC, puts out these ridiculous stories/accusations, and the Left laps them up like pigs at a trough.  Fool me once, shame on you.  Fool me twice, shame on me.  Yet the Left continues to be fooled.   It’s uncanny.  Makes zero sense.   One would think most folks with at least a double digit IQ would finally start to question them, but nope.

Need more proof?   Dan Rather had a document.  It existed.  He reported on it and was fired when the document was (again) proven to be a fake.   As someone a little older, take my advice.   Any derogatory News story that comes out about Trump between now and the election, assume they are false/fake.   Most, if not all, will be.  I respect your right to dislike Trump.  I’m not fond of Trump the man either.  But don’t buy into all the negative 🐂💩 from the MSM.   I don’t even trust most of the right wing news fully, and heaven knows they’re not as bad as the MSM.

The documents are IRS forms, man. They are tax returns. Not opinions. Stuff that went to the IRS over trump’s signature.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said:

These documents are pure allegations at this point.

What if they’re not? Is not the circumstantial evidence overwhelming? Just the fact he refuses to release the things that will exonerate him if he’s telling the truth is darn near prima facie evidence that he’s got stuff to hide. That you would cheer his birther attack on President Obama requiring an official document as the only valid proof of his citizenship, then let him skate over something as significant as a half billion in debt to unknown creditors when the proof exists in an official document that he could produce is absolutely unfathomable to me. I refuse to believe you are that divorced from logical thinking. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/29/2020 at 11:45 AM, SW1966 said:

UT alum, I agree with you.  There is legitimate concern Trump could be compromised by his debt and that this could negatively impact American security.  I care if a president of either part would do this, but most people only care if it is the other party.

If the evidence is circumstantial, it is somewhat less than overwhelming.  If there were issues with the IRS, they would have surfaced long ago and the embedded trump haters within the irs would have pursued diligently long ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, UT alum said:

What if they’re not? Is not the circumstantial evidence overwhelming? Just the fact he refuses to release the things that will exonerate him if he’s telling the truth is darn near prima facie evidence that he’s got stuff to hide. That you would cheer his birther attack on President Obama requiring an official document as the only valid proof of his citizenship, then let him skate over something as significant as a half billion in debt to unknown creditors when the proof exists in an official document that he could produce is absolutely unfathomable to me. I refuse to believe you are that divorced from logical thinking. 

Still pure speculation!!  What ifs!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,181
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Josh4343
    Newest Member
    Josh4343
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...