Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Both teams have shown signs of solid development. I'm more familiar with PNG's strengths and weaknesses. Nederland looks tall and fast. It's hard to gauge how good they really are from that Jacksonville performance - Jacksonville looked pretty terrible overall. PNG has only played teams from bigger schools, which I think should give them some really good experience heading into the game. PNG's problems dealing with a running QB are going to be tough to deal with. Nederland showed a lot of strength nearly coming back to win against Lufkin, and of course PNG has had to play from behind in every game. Nederland QB appears talented, competent, and not prone to mistakes. Nederland RB is fast and strong. PNG has probably the best QB in the area, and a stable of receivers with (mostly) good hands and smart route running. PNG also has two solid RBs. PNG has struggled on defense, but so did Nederland against Lufkin. PNG has played more games, and all three of the teams they played were tougher than Jacksonville. So PNG might have an experience edge, but with PNG's defensive problems that might not make much of a difference. For the first time in several years I genuinely think it's a 50-50 split. 

Posted
47 minutes ago, Rez Ipsa said:

Both teams have shown signs of solid development. I'm more familiar with PNG's strengths and weaknesses. Nederland looks tall and fast. It's hard to gauge how good they really are from that Jacksonville performance - Jacksonville looked pretty terrible overall. PNG has only played teams from bigger schools, which I think should give them some really good experience heading into the game. PNG's problems dealing with a running QB are going to be tough to deal with. Nederland showed a lot of strength nearly coming back to win against Lufkin, and of course PNG has had to play from behind in every game. Nederland QB appears talented, competent, and not prone to mistakes. Nederland RB is fast and strong. PNG has probably the best QB in the area, and a stable of receivers with (mostly) good hands and smart route running. PNG also has two solid RBs. PNG has struggled on defense, but so did Nederland against Lufkin. PNG has played more games, and all three of the teams they played were tougher than Jacksonville. So PNG might have an experience edge, but with PNG's defensive problems that might not make much of a difference. For the first time in several years I genuinely think it's a 50-50 split. 

I saw the game online ( Tomball).  There was other issues during that game that hurt as well, but I do have y’all beating Nederland by a score.  I seen them.  They have a mediocre RB but a REALLY good WR, #8 Fuselier.  I think y’all good for a couple of stops and Nederland has a tendency to not finish off drives.  

Posted
13 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

I saw the game online ( Tomball).  There was other issues during that game that hurt as well, but I do have y’all beating Nederland by a score.  I seen them.  They have a mediocre RB but a REALLY good WR, #8 Fuselier.  I think y’all good for a couple of stops and Nederland has a tendency to not finish off drives.  

Last time I checked that Mazyck kid was pretty good 

Posted

I like the Dogs chances this year....Dogs have lots of weapons ... I’m thinking the Dogs slow Bost enough to out score the injuns.. Injuns will have to score a bunch to take this one. Best of luck to both squads to come out of this Covid shortened season injury free.

Posted
On 10/11/2020 at 6:57 PM, BMTSoulja1 said:

I saw the game online ( Tomball).  There was other issues during that game that hurt as well, but I do have y’all beating Nederland by a score.  I seen them.  They have a mediocre RB but a REALLY good WR, #8 Fuselier.  I think y’all good for a couple of stops and Nederland has a tendency to not finish off drives.  

I know you're not referring to the kid that ran over United a couple years ago as mediocre? That kid was a really nice RB. Wasn't he injured last season or did that kid graduate? 

Posted
3 hours ago, Yeoj said:

I know you're not referring to the kid that ran over United a couple years ago as mediocre? That kid was a really nice RB. Wasn't he injured last season or did that kid graduate? 

Injured last year kept him out. He’s a senior this year and ready to run

Posted
3 hours ago, Yeoj said:

I know you're not referring to the kid that ran over United a couple years ago as mediocre? That kid was a really nice RB. Wasn't he injured last season or did that kid graduate? 

Everyone ran all over United their first year. 

Posted

Should be another great game.  We have 2 pretty dang good RB's and a WR.  Bost is a great QB.  There O line is always good.  There defense might be the weak link.  If Big Ned continues to get better at their QB position, game on. 

Nederland by TD.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Bigdog said:

If Neds D can slow down the QB and passing game I like thier chances.  Ned has shown that they can put up plenty of points.

2 things I see.  Bost is extremely good, however, I don’t think PNG won’t have an answer for Fuselier on either side of the ball.  

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,282
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Unknown472929300
    Newest Member
    Unknown472929300
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...