Top 50 All Time Winning Percentages All Classifications

[KFDM COOP]

Some of these numbers differ slightly from other posted rankings but these are the numbers I have calculated from my own research. The records of all 1004 active teams 1A through 5A on the UIL roster for 2005 were included in compiling this list.

Top 50 Highest All-Time Winning Percentages among active 11-man UIL teams (no minimum games played)

(includes games thru 2005 season--ties are counted as one half of a win)

1. 24-3A West Orange-Stark (258-71-3) 78.16%

2. 3-5A Odessa Permian (432-119-12) 77.80%

3. 22-4A Houston Yates (347-100-12) 76.91%

4. 1-4A El Paso Chapin (35-11-0) 76.09%

5. 16-5A Austin Westlake (321-103-7) 75.29%

6. 9-5A Dallas Carter (333-107-9) 75.17%

7. 5-5A Southlake Carroll (382-126-8 ) 74.81%

8. 1-5A El Paso Franklin (95-32-0) 74.80%

9. 26-4A Pflugerville Connally (71-25-0) 73.96%

10. 11-4A Highland Park (673-238-27) 73.19%

11. 7-5A Arlington Lamar (287-105-6) 72.86%

12. 25-4A Austin Reagan (329-126-11) 71.78%

13. 27-2A Universal City Randolph (327-128-13) 71.26%

14. 27-5A San Antonio Clark (219-91-5) 70.32%

15. 26-5A Converse Judson (373-155-10) 70.26%

16. 13-5A Killeen Harker Heights (48-21-0) 69.57%

17. 4-5A Mansfield Summit (32-14-0) 69.57%

18. 2-5A Amarillo (686-299-22) 69.22%

19. 22-1A Groveton (580-250-34) 69.10%

20. 8-5A Plano (679-293-47) 68.94%

21. 23-4A La Marque (473-212-17) 68.59%

22. 20-5A Fort Bend Hightower (48-22-0) 68.57%

23. 13-5A Temple (667-292-52) 68.55%

24. 29-2A Refugio (553-252-31) 68.00%

25. 6-5A Euless Trinity (291-138-6) 67.59%

26. 12-2A Crawford (475-222-29) 67.42%

27. 20-2A Garrison (438-210-13) 67.25%

28. 29-3A Hondo (607-288-31) 67.22%

29. 13-2A Celina (464-222-18 ) 67.19%

30. 14-5A The Woodlands (210-101-7) 67.14%

31. 13-5A Waco Cons. (153-76-2) 66.67%

32. 16-4A Brownwood (621-309-29) 66.27%

33. 32-5A Harlingen (551-272-37) 66.22%

34. 8-5A Plano West (41-21-0) 66.13%

35. 2-3A Littlefield (533-272-27) 65.69%

36. 28-4A Medina Valley (319-165-7) 65.68%

37. 24-4A El Campo (568-288-38 ) 65.66%

38. 26-5A San Antonio Churchill (287-148-11) 65.58%

39. 3-2A Ballinger (571-293-29) 65.57%

40. 6-1A Seagraves (464-241-13) 65.53%

41. 8-5A Lewisville (502-260-25) 65.37%

42. 16-3A White Oak (480-250-26) 65.21%

43. 6-3A Pilot Point (484-251-31) 65.21%

44. 14-4A Corsicana (629-327-43) 65.12%

45. 26-5A San Antonio Madison (205-109-4) 65.09%

46. 14-5A Lufkin (590-308-37) 65.08%

47. 23-3A Barbers Hill (499-262-27) 65.04%

48. 20-5A Fort Bend Willowridge (193-103-4) 65.00%

49. 22-2A Mart (609-320-42) 64.88%

50. 8-5A Plano East (173-93-4) 64.81%

[Guest Jody]

Coop, BUD........you don't really want to open that can of worms do you?

[WOS92]

Funny stuff, Jody... especially the sig

[KFDM COOP]

Proof's in the pudding right there!! :thumbsup

[KFDM COOP]

Grad, you have to agree!

[KFDM COOP]

I wonder if Permian will ever be as good as Year's past?

[WOSgrad]

Grad' date=' you have to agree![/quote']

And where did someone say that I disagreed? I'll scream from the highest mountain that WO-S is one of the top teams in the state. When I tell someone here in the Houston area that knows anything about football that I graduated from WO-S, eyes grow wide and the neck straightens up.

It is really great work by WOS87, but it only confirms what we all already knew.

P.S. Could you tell us when the list will be updated to reflect the new district affiliations of those on the list?

[WOS87]

P.S. Could you tell us when the list will be updated to reflect the new district affiliations of those on the list?

It already is updated on my original post.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[KFDM COOP]

Thanks 87 for all the hard work!

[bigred75]

When I tell someone here in the Houston area that knows anything about football that I graduated from WO-S, eyes grow wide and the neck straightens up.

Thats a sign that they are about to pass out from standing there for hours listening to how great ya'll were in years past.....................Its like at a wedding when the groomsman pass out becasue they lock their legs from standing there so long......same reaction you get. Its not AWWWW your experiencing its ;omg AWWWW please will you stop talking so I can leave.............................

[ESPN]

Still have the Highest Winning Percentage in all Classifications!! EVEN TODAY!!

[BHFAN]

This could mean that historically WOS was really good or their competition wasn't. Maybe a combo of both

[KFDM COOP]

They were pretty good. Even in 1985 when WOS was 5A they played the number 1 team in the Country Yates pretty dang close.

[BHFAN]

They were pretty good. Even in 1985 when WOS was 5A they played the number 1 team in the Country Yates pretty dang close.

Dang West of the Trinity teams

[KFDM COOP]

That damn Trinity.

[bigred75]

Maybe we should fill it in with sand.....................or WOS ego either one will more than do the job hahaha.

[Bigdog]

Now do one by state championships.

[KFDM COOP]

May be in the Historical Forum.

[Bigdog]

Its not really a relative comparison, actually. Some of those teams haven't played a quarter of the games that some of the others have. WOS has almost 200 less games than MOJO. Harker Heights has only played 60 games, where there are teams on there that have played almost 900. The percentages are going to be different.

[KFDM COOP]

Oh i know..

[KFDM COOP]

I tell you what Nederland should be very good again with that Backfield and QB..

[Bigdog]

I am not intending this as a bash against any of those teams. WOS' record is very impressive, I am not contesting that. I'm just pointing out that because these are averages that are posted, that the teams with less games total have an advantage because it takes less wins to acheive a higher average. I was suggesting do averages for 500 games and above played for example or 500 games and under.

[KFDM COOP]

WOS 87 does those, i see if he can do those..

[Guest GoStangs]

the teams with less games total have an advantage because it takes less wins to acheive a higher average.

Or, maybe they're at a disadvantage, since each loss has more of an impact on their percentage than teams with a lot of games...

I think the point you're making is that a more accurate picture of a team's winning percentage is by comparing like-amount of games. That's a valid argument... To me, it's very impressive for WOS to be at the top of the list, but it will be more impressive if they can remain there for a long period of time. There was a lot of work put into getting them where they are, and they beat a bunch of solid teams along the way; hopefully, they can stay there for a long while.

[Bigdog]

yeah, thats what I was trying to say. It does work both ways against and for.