Jump to content

Livingston 21 Vidor 7/FINAL


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, piratevillain said:

DCTF computer rankings had us at #36 this week, I'm pretty sure we'll be out of the top 50, Monday.😬

They had y'all ahead of Livingston in the rankings but losing by one.

BTW, why was Matthews going crazy on the sidelines?  I think y'all got more calls/no calls and the Pirates were the road team. Y'all were holding all night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Lions Pride 2021 said:

They had y'all ahead of Livingston in the rankings but losing by one.

BTW, why was Matthews going crazy on the sidelines?  I think y'all got more calls/no calls and the Pirates were the road team. Y'all were holding all night.

I think he was mad for the blocking in the back call on that kickoff return at the end of the game. First time I've seen a flag thrown against Mathews. But Livingston had I believe 8 penalties compared to Vidor's 4, don't quote me on that though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Lions Pride 2021 said:

They had y'all ahead of Livingston in the rankings but losing by one.

BTW, why was Matthews going crazy on the sidelines?  I think y'all got more calls/no calls and the Pirates were the road team. Y'all were holding all night.

Congratulations on the win. I’m happy y’all are winning again 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This karma. A certain person before i put him on my ignore ignorance list said Port Arthur Memorial dropped down and said we were gonna wreck 5A which was untrue. I was the only person damn near said we would lose to Vidor 2016 ask @robanadana 

 

Vidor drops and ppl including Vidor ppl think they gon wreck 4A D1. Nope. Lol. Splenderella and Livingston said hello. Whew. I love karma. 😁☕

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another ugly performance no show, this time with way too many turnovers. Was it 3 interceptions to the same DB and a fumble? I could still see us actually play hard and beat HH on Senior night. It wouldn’t surprise me the way this team is up and down. Livingston is much improved, although it looked like their QB almost got killed out there. I’m surprised he came back in the game better ice him up, you lose him and it’s a wrap. The Pirates were mauling the backup QB but the starter is mobile enough to make plays behind a questionable offensive line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, piratevillain said:

Mathews didn't even let the kids shake hands with Livingston when it was over, and that's unusual for him. But I think kids were getting chippy with each other.

That's because of COVID. I feel bad for all the bands, they're not getting any on field practice

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, piratevillain said:

I think he was mad for the blocking in the back call on that kickoff return at the end of the game. First time I've seen a flag thrown against Mathews. But Livingston had I believe 8 penalties compared to Vidor's 4, don't quote me on that though.

That's what I'm getting at. Vidor had more calls go their way, or rather more non calls.

He ain't look to happy walking towards the bus after the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Boneyard Boys said:

Another ugly performance no show, this time with way too many turnovers. Was it 3 interceptions to the same DB and a fumble? I could still see us actually play hard and beat HH on Senior night. It wouldn’t surprise me the way this team is up and down. Livingston is much improved, although it looked like their QB almost got killed out there. I’m surprised he came back in the game better ice him up, you lose him and it’s a wrap. The Pirates were mauling the backup QB but the starter is mobile enough to make plays behind a questionable offensive line.

I’d like to see some of the athletes on defense get a chance on the offensive side of the ball. Too many good ones not getting utilized on offense. Gotta let them go both ways

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MYHOUSE said:

I’d like to see some of the athletes on defense get a chance on the offensive side of the ball. Too many good ones not getting utilized on offense. Gotta let them go both ways

I thought the same thing after the Splendora game, they are starting to mix the skill guys in a little more. They might want to consider playing some of the linemen both ways at times too. But it’s a little late in the season to be figuring it all out on the fly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Lions Pride 2021 said:

That's because of COVID. I feel bad for all the bands, they're not getting any on field practice

Practice for what? Band Competition? They can’t practice on the football field? 

 

5 hours ago, piratevillain said:

That's true. I feel bad for the bands/dancers too not being able to travel and perform. They're a big reason why they make FNL's so much fun week in and week out, imo

Good grief...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Like I said, even if it’s only 10% of the 100 kids BHISD takes from GCCISD each year, that’s 10 athletes per year and that’s being generous.  You’re right about the jobs with BHISD, BTW.  There’s more than 1 athlete from Baytown originally who got transferred to BHISD after a job opened up for Mama.
    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...