jmspears3 Posted September 18, 2007 Report Posted September 18, 2007 I just wanted to get ya'lls opinion on thisWas this a hold? it happened right in front of the ref.Look at first videoHold is on bottom of the screen.http://s86.photobucket.com/albums/k97/sfbvideo/?action=view¤t=WFRTouchdownControversy-SFB07-G3-H.264Webcasting.flv
jmspears3 Posted September 18, 2007 Author Report Posted September 18, 2007 can't see the videoClick on svfb video and thenClick on the enlarge button at top of page
Guest EagleFan01 Posted September 18, 2007 Report Posted September 18, 2007 They called that a TD? Look like it was incomplete to me not real sure though.
NedDog Posted September 18, 2007 Report Posted September 18, 2007 LOL, that looked more like a take-down!!
BMTSoulja1 Posted September 18, 2007 Report Posted September 18, 2007 Yea, it was holding. You have to let go if he isnt' directly in front of you anymore. Must have been the Houston officials there.
jmspears3 Posted September 18, 2007 Author Report Posted September 18, 2007 Yea, it was holding. You have to let go if he isnt' directly in front of you anymore. Must have been the Houston officials there.No they were from the Wichita Falls chapter, they were probably trained in the Houston area. ;D ;D
24 over par Posted September 18, 2007 Report Posted September 18, 2007 whats at little take down among friends
82 5A State Champs Posted September 18, 2007 Report Posted September 18, 2007 Yea, it was holding. You have to let go if he isnt' directly in front of you anymore. Must have been the Houston officials there.LMAO.....must have been the same ones that officiated the WB/Westfield game!
Guest ndn09 Posted September 19, 2007 Report Posted September 19, 2007 I think it was wrong that the ref did not call that play
Mr. Buddy Garrity Posted September 19, 2007 Report Posted September 19, 2007 It was a great no call, right sville?
highsky Posted September 19, 2007 Report Posted September 19, 2007 Yea, it was holding. You have to let go if he isnt' directly in front of you anymore. Must have been the Houston officials there.the officials probably let that go because he was being manhandled by the Olineman. He had no chance at the QB. As long as his hands stay in his chest and not outside the shoulders, he can pretty much do what he wants. That Olineman was in control the whole way. I would be embarrassed if I was the manhandled defender's coach b/c that was just flat out domination. BTW, Soulja, he was in front of him the whole time in my opinion.
BMTSoulja1 Posted September 19, 2007 Report Posted September 19, 2007 If you look at the part when he threw the rb to the side. Right before he started driving that defender, he held him to get back in position. That was holdering. Stevie Wonder and Ray charles could have seen that.
Mr. Buddy Garrity Posted September 19, 2007 Report Posted September 19, 2007 If you look at the part when he threw the rb to the side. Right before he started driving that defender, he held him to get back in position. That was holdering. Stevie Wonder and Ray charles could have seen that.I didnt see it ;DROHO go Raiders ;D
jmspears3 Posted September 19, 2007 Author Report Posted September 19, 2007 It was a great no call, right sville? It did not effect the outcome of the game, right scooter ;D
Mr. Buddy Garrity Posted September 19, 2007 Report Posted September 19, 2007 It did not effect the outcome of the game, right scooter ;D :'(
Recommended Posts