Jump to content

UT ALUM and BIG GIRL and the now departed SW1966/ECO


stevenash

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

Tucker Carlson is a shill for right wing conspiracy purveyors. I don’t trust anything he says or does. Just like that house painter Hannity. 

Carlson didn’t say it, Bobulinsky did.  And he has documentation and proof.  You don’t trust Tucker & Hannity but hang on every word (lie) the MSM feeds you.   Have you noticed the coverage the MSM has given this?   Their only response, to accuse Bobulinsky of being a Russian conspirator.   This man was a Navel Officer working with nuclear submarines deployment.   Not exactly the portrait the MSM portrays.   And has it ever entered your mind why no MSM Reporter (that’s a misnomer if ever there was one) has ask Biden, “Do you know Bobulinsky?”.   A simple question.  Why haven’t they ask?  Don’t swallow the bs they’re feeding you.  Simply look at the things that are, or are not, happening in regards to this story.  The silence from the MSM is deafening.  If it’s not true, let the MSM state why it isn’t, don’t sweep it under the Russian conspiracy carpet.   It’s full under there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BS Wildcats said:

Yet you bite hook,line, and sinker on what Hillary, Schiff, Nader, Pelosi, and Schumer have to say on Russian collusion.  

@UT alum is smarter than that. He chooses to look the other way because of ideological blindness, but any intelligent person knows deep down the Biden corruption is real. If Biden wins (which is a very distinct possibility) he won’t make the full term. He will be aborted to make room for the more progressive movement. He probably doesn’t even know that. Either 1. His fellow Democrats will turn on him regarding this scandal to have him impeached, 2. He will be removed due to his already onset dementia, 3. They will convince him to get out of the way in exchange for keeping his son, Hunter, out of prison or 4. They will simply work around him through Congress and the Senate.

None of us are voting for Trump or Biden. We are voting to keep our country in tact. Understand this. Biden is just the puppet. He is only the vehicle for the Progressive/Socialist powers to change these United States and the Constitution that thousands have fought to protect. If you don’t like Trump, but you love our Republic, you have to vote the Republican ticket all the way down. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, SmashMouth said:

@UT alum is smarter than that. He chooses to look the other way because of ideological blindness, but any intelligent person knows deep down the Biden corruption is real. If Biden wins (which is a very distinct possibility) he won’t make the full term. He will be aborted to make room for the more progressive movement. He probably doesn’t even know that. Either 1. His fellow Democrats will turn on him regarding this scandal to have him impeached, 2. He will be removed due to his already onset dementia, 3. They will convince him to get out of the way in exchange for keeping his son, Hunter, out of prison or 4. They will simply work around him through Congress and the Senate.

None of us are voting for Trump or Biden. We are voting to keep our country in tact. Understand this. Biden is just the puppet. He is only the vehicle for the Progressive/Socialist powers to change these United States and the Constitution that thousands have fought to protect. If you don’t like Trump, but you love our Republic, you have to vote the Republican ticket all the way down. 

I agree!! IF he wins, he will be out within a year.  Bank on it!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, SmashMouth said:

@UT alum is smarter than that. He chooses to look the other way because of ideological blindness, but any intelligent person knows deep down the Biden corruption is real. If Biden wins (which is a very distinct possibility) he won’t make the full term. He will be aborted to make room for the more progressive movement. He probably doesn’t even know that. Either 1. His fellow Democrats will turn on him regarding this scandal to have him impeached, 2. He will be removed due to his already onset dementia, 3. They will convince him to get out of the way in exchange for keeping his son, Hunter, out of prison or 4. They will simply work around him through Congress and the Senate.

None of us are voting for Trump or Biden. We are voting to keep our country in tact. Understand this. Biden is just the puppet. He is only the vehicle for the Progressive/Socialist powers to change these United States and the Constitution that thousands have fought to protect. If you don’t like Trump, but you love our Republic, you have to vote the Republican ticket all the way down. 

2. Has always been my choice

3. Since the Hunter story has evolved, this would be a very good plan”B”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SmashMouth said:

@UT alum is smarter than that. He chooses to look the other way because of ideological blindness, but any intelligent person knows deep down the Biden corruption is real. If Biden wins (which is a very distinct possibility) he won’t make the full term. He will be aborted to make room for the more progressive movement. He probably doesn’t even know that. Either 1. His fellow Democrats will turn on him regarding this scandal to have him impeached, 2. He will be removed due to his already onset dementia, 3. They will convince him to get out of the way in exchange for keeping his son, Hunter, out of prison or 4. They will simply work around him through Congress and the Senate.

None of us are voting for Trump or Biden. We are voting to keep our country in tact. Understand this. Biden is just the puppet. He is only the vehicle for the Progressive/Socialist powers to change these United States and the Constitution that thousands have fought to protect. If you don’t like Trump, but you love our Republic, you have to vote the Republican ticket all the way down. 

I wonder how if warren or sanders will be put on cabinet 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BS Wildcats said:

Yet you bite hook,line, and sinker on what Hillary, Schiff, Nader, Pelosi, and Schumer have to say on Russian collusion.  

I watch from a distance and draw my own conclusions on collusion. None of that matters anyway. trump will pay for his abject ineptitude on Tuesday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Like I said, even if it’s only 10% of the 100 kids BHISD takes from GCCISD each year, that’s 10 athletes per year and that’s being generous.  You’re right about the jobs with BHISD, BTW.  There’s more than 1 athlete from Baytown originally who got transferred to BHISD after a job opened up for Mama.
    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...