Reagan Posted December 5, 2020 Report Posted December 5, 2020 19 hours ago, BLUEDOVE3 said: LOL!!! Probably/maybe The point was that you didn't actually watch the video. This is why you didn't quote it correctly. You probably/maybe listened to what CNN or MSLSD said about it and quoted them! Quote
BLUEDOVE3 Posted December 6, 2020 Report Posted December 6, 2020 7 hours ago, Reagan said: The point was that you didn't actually watch the video. This is why you didn't quote it correctly. You probably/maybe listened to what CNN or MSLSD said about it and quoted them! Actually, I watched the video. Mostly his same old whining self. Quote
BLUEDOVE3 Posted December 8, 2020 Report Posted December 8, 2020 4 hours ago, Realville said: Why are you quoting Levin...err Trump? Just steady throwing out stuff and hoping it sticks somewhere, other than the Trump cult. Quote
stevenash Posted December 9, 2020 Report Posted December 9, 2020 Throwing stuff out hoping it will stick? Stormy Daniels? Russian Collusion? Trump said soldiers were losers? Quid Pro Quo? Quote
Realville Posted December 9, 2020 Report Posted December 9, 2020 1 hour ago, BLUEDOVE3 said: Why are you quoting Levin...err Trump? Just steady throwing out stuff and hoping it sticks somewhere, other than the Trump cult. Say what you will but Trump is going to be your Orange Daddy for 4 more years! Did you like how I added that liberal twist by adding his skin color since y’all feel skin color is so important? 😎🇺🇸 Quote
Realville Posted December 9, 2020 Report Posted December 9, 2020 26 minutes ago, PAMFAM10 said: Supreme Court has spoken🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 The Port Arthur Supreme Court? 🇨🇳😂🤣 Quote
Reagan Posted December 9, 2020 Report Posted December 9, 2020 2 hours ago, PAMFAM10 said: Supreme Court has spoken🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 Not yet. Did you see what Texas did? I see other states are joining. This goes directly to the Supreme Court! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
Reagan Posted December 9, 2020 Report Posted December 9, 2020 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
Realville Posted December 9, 2020 Report Posted December 9, 2020 9 hours ago, Reagan said: Not yet. Did you see what Texas did? I see other states are joining. This goes directly to the Supreme Court! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up I don’t appreciate all these thieving states diluting our Texas electoral votes with all this bullshit they did to steal the election. They should all be put on trial for Treason! Good to see Texas leading the way! Reagan 1 Quote
Reagan Posted December 9, 2020 Report Posted December 9, 2020 More WOW!! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
Big girl Posted December 9, 2020 Report Posted December 9, 2020 18 hours ago, Reagan said: Not yet. Did you see what Texas did? I see other states are joining. This goes directly to the Supreme Court! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up He is not going to be the President. Why are you deluding yourself? The fat lady sang. What news outlet are you watching? Unbelievable Quote
baddog Posted December 9, 2020 Report Posted December 9, 2020 1 hour ago, Big girl said: He is not going to be the President. Why are you deluding yourself? The fat lady sang. What news outlet are you watching? Unbelievable This is proof positive of how the sheeple are led to slaughter. So naïve they can’t even discern what is real and what is fed to them. Lmao Quote
Realville Posted December 9, 2020 Report Posted December 9, 2020 1 hour ago, Big girl said: He is not going to be the President. Why are you deluding yourself? The fat lady sang. What news outlet are you watching? Unbelievable I believe the State of Texas and 17 other States disagrees with you. 😎🇺🇸 Quote
UT alum Posted December 10, 2020 Author Report Posted December 10, 2020 On 12/8/2020 at 8:41 PM, Reagan said: Not yet. Did you see what Texas did? I see other states are joining. This goes directly to the Supreme Court! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up The dustbin of history awaits the terse one line denial of this suit by the Supremes just like the Pennsylvania suit. It’s over. He lost. Now he needs to get lost. Cheats can’t stand to lose fair and square. If you want eastern European style elections, move to Eastern Europe. Quote
UT alum Posted December 10, 2020 Author Report Posted December 10, 2020 On 12/8/2020 at 7:46 PM, Realville said: Say what you will but Trump is going to be your Orange Daddy for 4 more years! Did you like how I added that liberal twist by adding his skin color since y’all feel skin color is so important? 😎🇺🇸 Color is not important, unless it’s running down the side of your face. Quote
baddog Posted December 10, 2020 Report Posted December 10, 2020 16 minutes ago, UT alum said: The dustbin of history awaits the terse one line denial of this suit by the Supremes just like the Pennsylvania suit. It’s over. He lost. Now he needs to get lost. Cheats can’t stand to lose fair and square. If you want eastern European style elections, move to Eastern Europe. Wrong as usual. Go look at my WOW thread and tell me what you think about that she dog. Quote
Realville Posted December 10, 2020 Report Posted December 10, 2020 42 minutes ago, UT alum said: Color is not important, unless it’s running down the side of your face. Or running down the street attacking innocent people then wondering why they got shot. Quote
Reagan Posted December 10, 2020 Report Posted December 10, 2020 2 hours ago, UT alum said: The dustbin of history awaits the terse one line denial of this suit by the Supremes just like the Pennsylvania suit. It’s over. He lost. Now he needs to get lost. Cheats can’t stand to lose fair and square. If you want eastern European style elections, move to Eastern Europe. Let me educate on the difference: The difference is is that what Texas is doing, they do not need to prove any fraud. This case goes directly to the Supreme Court. This is strictly a Constitutional violation question. The only ones at the state level that can make election rules and laws are the LEGISLATURES!! In these states, the Governor, the Secretary of State and the state Supreme Courts were making/changing rules that 100% violates the U.S Constitution. So, with that being said, true, the Supreme Court does not have to take this. BUT -- if they do, then there's no doubt that laws were broken by these 4-5 states and Trump will win. I know you won't hear this info on CNN. Do your homework and prove me wrong! Realville 1 Quote
SmashMouth Posted December 10, 2020 Report Posted December 10, 2020 Serious question. If there is a Constitutional violation, does Trump just automatically win? Does everyone have to vote again? What’s the factual process on how this get sorted out? Idk the answer. Anyone? Quote
Realville Posted December 10, 2020 Report Posted December 10, 2020 4 hours ago, Reagan said: Let me educate on the difference: The difference is is that what Texas is doing, they do not need to prove any fraud. This case goes directly to the Supreme Court. This is strictly a Constitutional violation question. The only ones at the state level that can make election rules and laws are the LEGISLATURES!! In these states, the Governor, the Secretary of State and the state Supreme Courts were making/changing rules that 100% violates the U.S Constitution. So, with that being said, true, the Supreme Court does not have to take this. BUT -- if they do, then there's no doubt that laws were broken by these 4-5 states and Trump will win. I know you won't hear this info on CNN. Do your homework and prove me wrong! Truth is so refreshing!😎🇺🇸 Reagan 1 Quote
Reagan Posted December 11, 2020 Report Posted December 11, 2020 It must be pretty bad In Pennsylvania when Pennsylvania joins Texas in suing itself! Lawd have mercy! LOL!! Quote
BLUEDOVE3 Posted December 11, 2020 Report Posted December 11, 2020 On 12/8/2020 at 7:22 PM, stevenash said: Throwing stuff out hoping it will stick? Stormy Daniels? Russian Collusion? Trump said soldiers were losers? Quid Pro Quo? I think Trump's legal problems will surface again after he's out of office in January. Quote
BLUEDOVE3 Posted December 11, 2020 Report Posted December 11, 2020 11 hours ago, Reagan said: Let me educate on the difference: The difference is is that what Texas is doing, they do not need to prove any fraud. This case goes directly to the Supreme Court. This is strictly a Constitutional violation question. The only ones at the state level that can make election rules and laws are the LEGISLATURES!! In these states, the Governor, the Secretary of State and the state Supreme Courts were making/changing rules that 100% violates the U.S Constitution. So, with that being said, true, the Supreme Court does not have to take this. BUT -- if they do, then there's no doubt that laws were broken by these 4-5 states and Trump will win. I know you won't hear this info on CNN. Do your homework and prove me wrong! You guys listen to News Max way too much. So, we're in America and these Birthers are asking the Supreme Court to ignore the votes from it's citizens? WOW!! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.