Guest maverick24 Posted September 26, 2007 Report Share Posted September 26, 2007 man come on he's not talkin about his record with juss lumberton he's a great coach First of all Your stats are wrong second Your big mouth said the Lumberton Coach had a loosing record wrong again!!! You are correct though all the Coaches you named have coached a long time. But yes you are putting the Coach down because you are saying he is not a good coach and you know nothing about him. This thread was Raider Defense not Bash a coach!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bronco1 Posted September 26, 2007 Report Share Posted September 26, 2007 not big Dugat its Dugats lil brother or someone kin to Dugat but its not himA.J. Dugat is Mike's little brother and A.J. is the QB now. I think the point that "texans" is trying to make about Coach C is that you can't call him a "great coach" until he has the record to prove it. I am sure he is a good coach, nice guy and all that. With all due respect, you can't call him great yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Baller Posted September 26, 2007 Report Share Posted September 26, 2007 Your serious? Dugat doesn't have to be Dishon fast, not many people are? Big Dugat was not even close to Dishon fast. Big Dugat barely broke a 5 flat 40 time, and he had 135 yards and 2 TD's on 3 carries aginst you last year. But that was last year. This is this year. Yes I agree that you are better in Lumberton, how could you not be with 8 returners coming back on defense. It should be a fun game. I REALLY BELIEVE THAT OUR DEFENSE WILL SURPRISE DAYTON!!!!!!DUGAT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE DISHON!!!!!  WE'LL BE READY TO PLAY ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
texans Posted September 26, 2007 Report Share Posted September 26, 2007 Maverick so your going to name calling. So if Lumberton doesnt win around 8 games your telling me one of two things. Either the kids are over rated with a great coach or the kids are very good without a great coach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
texans Posted September 26, 2007 Report Share Posted September 26, 2007 maverick my stats or not wrong, left off a 6 after the 5 on nueman only an idiot wouldnt know that was a typing mistake. Like I said nobody cares what a coaches record is on the JV and Freshman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest maverick24 Posted September 26, 2007 Report Share Posted September 26, 2007 Texans why do you insist on getting on a Lumberton thread about the Raiders Defense and continue to down the team or the coach. If you read my origanl post it said Lumberton has great coaches now and they are slowly building great players. Yes your stats you posted were wrong you said he had 5 loses that was wrong so IÂ did not say anything that was not true. No one said anything about Lumbertons coach's record simply that he was a great coach. but if it makes you feel better to bash Lumberton go ahead and have your fun I don't think anyone is paying you any attention anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
texans Posted September 26, 2007 Report Share Posted September 26, 2007 I have not said anything negative about Lumbertons team or coach. show me where I said that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Baller Posted September 26, 2007 Report Share Posted September 26, 2007 You two (Maverick and Texans) sound like an old married couple. Let the kids play the game and see what happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L-Town Stunners Posted September 26, 2007 Report Share Posted September 26, 2007 How come is it that every time a thread is started about Lumberton football it always starts as a positive discussion and always ends up being a bashing from other schools and Lumberton players running their heads and bumping their gums? Â And now ya'll have even drug the coach into the bashing. Â You can tell Coach C don't look at this forum. Â You think after last years forum wars and the final record ya'll would have learned your lessons. Â Guess not. :-[ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BMTSoulja1 Posted September 26, 2007 Report Share Posted September 26, 2007 Your serious? Dugat doesn't have to be Dishon fast, not many people are? Big Dugat was not even close to Dishon fast. Big Dugat barely broke a 5 flat 40 time, and he had 135 yards and 2 TD's on 3 carries aginst you last year. But that was last year. This is this year. Yes I agree that you are better in Lumberton, how could you not be with 8 returners coming back on defense. It should be a fun game.  No way that Mike Dugat ran a 5 flat in a 40. He played my Jags, he apeared to be running 4.6. dont' know how fast Dishon was though. But 4.6 in HS football is pretty darn good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest coch_hound_sugga Posted September 26, 2007 Report Share Posted September 26, 2007 Raider d-line is good. #95 goes non stop, awesome motor & great physical ability. Hope they do well against Dayton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shsu31 Posted September 26, 2007 Report Share Posted September 26, 2007 Raider d-line is good. #95 goes non stop, awesome motor & great physical ability. Hope they do well against Dayton. there you go again!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indian01 Posted September 26, 2007 Report Share Posted September 26, 2007 Who is Lumberton's DC? Their d seems to be very well coached this year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Baller Posted September 26, 2007 Report Share Posted September 26, 2007 Trust me, he is no better than a 4.9 in the 40. Mike had great vision and could make people miss with subtle moves. He was not fast at all...No way that Mike Dugat ran a 5 flat in a 40. He played my Jags, he apeared to be running 4.6. dont' know how fast Dishon was though. But 4.6 in HS football is pretty darn good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McHale Posted September 26, 2007 Report Share Posted September 26, 2007 That was always my impression of him as well. I thought he was pretty good at breaking tackles too. Trust me, he is no better than a 4.9 in the 40. Mike had great vision and could make people miss with subtle moves. He was not fast at all... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts