bhawk Posted September 26, 2007 Report Posted September 26, 2007 would the raiders be a better team if they took hussey out and alternated beard and hannah at running back?
dayton Posted September 26, 2007 Report Posted September 26, 2007 if beard and hannah played every down they wouldn't bust those big runs every time. takes away the surprise of an explosive backup. IMOI'll take 2 scores just out of the blue every game. Either way...aren't they linebackers? If the present offense is getting the job done, I'd keep them fresh for defense.
Guest maverick24 Posted September 26, 2007 Report Posted September 26, 2007 All three are Dif. type runners and the fact that anyone of them can break a big run is what makes them all good.
dayton Posted September 26, 2007 Report Posted September 26, 2007 All three are Dif. type runners and the fact that anyone of them can break a big run is what makes them all good.I agree...i think rotating like that makes the big run more of a threat. But, it is important to get one guy in a rhythm that can get 3-5 yds a carry. If that is Hussey, so be it.
footballfan5261 Posted September 26, 2007 Report Posted September 26, 2007 would the raiders be a better team if they took hussey out and alternated beard and hannah at running back?are you kidding me??? : Hussey is the best runnin back out of the three. that is rediculous
bhawk Posted September 26, 2007 Author Report Posted September 26, 2007 husseys a good running back...but thats a bit of a strech sayin hes the best outta the three...even though he's young and a lower classmen id have to say beard is the most presistant on yards out of the three
Raider88 Posted September 26, 2007 Report Posted September 26, 2007 Who cares, it is a team sport. Use them all so they will all have fresh legs. With each of them having different styles it will also be harder on the defense. Another scenario is to play a couple of them at a time. It would be hard to defend with more weapons on the field.
Guest kingme2007 Posted September 26, 2007 Report Posted September 26, 2007 would the raiders be a better team if they took hussey out and alternated beard and hannah at running back?are you kidding me??? : Hussey is the best runnin back out of the three. that is rediculous
bronco1 Posted September 26, 2007 Report Posted September 26, 2007 would the raiders be a better team if they took hussey out and alternated beard and hannah at running back?No. What kind of a question is that? ??? :
geauxbroncos Posted September 26, 2007 Report Posted September 26, 2007 would the raiders be a better team if they took hussey out and alternated beard and hannah at running back?Aren't y'all 3 and 0? Why fix what is not broke? Wait until after Friday and then I can give a better opinion.
Guest BIG HOUSE Posted September 27, 2007 Report Posted September 27, 2007 FACT IS: THESE YOUNG MEN ARE ALL GOOD RUNNING BACKS.THEY HAVE DIFFERENT ABILITIES.HUSSEY 5'7 190lbs.BEARD 6'1 210lbsHANNA 6'0 210lbsDUE TO GENETICS THE YOUNGER 2 ARE LARGER BACKS. SPEED WISE, ALL 3 ARE VERY CLOSE TO THE OTHER.(YES THATS TRUE).HUSSEY IS THE MOST PATIENT OF THE 3. HE ALSO HAS AS GREAT HANDS.YOU CAN BET THAT WE WILL USE ALL 3. ANY ONE OF THESE GUYS CAN AND WILL GET IT DONE.
Pimp Smack Posted September 27, 2007 Report Posted September 27, 2007 hussey is 5'8. 195. just so u know
Guest BIG HOUSE Posted September 27, 2007 Report Posted September 27, 2007 HEY PIMPSMACK, do you even know Cody Hussey?Kid is AT BEST 5'7 190lbs. Not very good and pretty slow.(SO WE HERE)
Pimp Smack Posted September 27, 2007 Report Posted September 27, 2007 First off yes i do know him. Hes one of my best friends. And i know for a fact hes 5'8. Second off. If you are callin him slow then you are callin Beard and Hanna slow to because in a 40 Hussey and Hanna are very close and Beard is right behind them.
vhs Posted September 27, 2007 Report Posted September 27, 2007 Are ya'll really arguing over whether this kid is 5-8 or 5-7. This is good stuff. Please continue.
WTB Posted September 27, 2007 Report Posted September 27, 2007 lol right now he is more like 5'6" 185-190 he lost some weight this summer thats why ur seeing more production
vhs Posted September 27, 2007 Report Posted September 27, 2007 Will someone please definitively solve the great mystery of the actual height of Hussey. Should we start a poll? Enquiring minds want to know.
Pimp Smack Posted September 27, 2007 Report Posted September 27, 2007 OMG!!! I WILL BET NE1 IN HERE THAT HE IS 5'8. I JUST TEXTED HIM 5 MIN AGO TO MAKE SURE. I HANG OUT WITH HIM ALLLL THE TIME. HE IS 5'8. DROP IT!!!!!!
vhs Posted September 27, 2007 Report Posted September 27, 2007 LMAO! No don't drop it, this is great stuff(sarcasm). The most intriguing thread going right now(more sarcasm). Please keep the dialogue going(more sarcasm).
vhs Posted September 27, 2007 Report Posted September 27, 2007 So is the guy 5'2" or 6'5"? I'm confused
Guest maverick24 Posted September 27, 2007 Report Posted September 27, 2007 He is shorter than the other two!! But really if you were 5-7 wouldn't you say you were 5-8 LOL
Ned11str8 Posted September 27, 2007 Report Posted September 27, 2007 hussey is 5'8. 195. just so u know5'7" 190lbs5'8" 195lbsclose enough!
jake94 Posted September 27, 2007 Report Posted September 27, 2007 How tall is Yao Ming? Is Cody Hussey Chinese? ???
lloydchristmas Posted September 27, 2007 Report Posted September 27, 2007 I think that anybody from Lumberton is an absolute MORON!!! And you are proving my point on this thread. Get a GRIP!! Who cares, all three are contributing members to a pretty good football team. You start this kind of stuff up and you will see how fast it crumbles!!!!
Recommended Posts