Guest nostradamus Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 Who are the voters then?I would love to hear some rationale behind their rankings?Why do they think Nederland is better than WB? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest nostradamus Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 "Why? It's SETX's board, they can run it and vote for who they wish. It is not an excersize in democracy, it is a sports opinion board."Why do you have to be consistent and realistic?Well, if you want to be considered credible then you need to be and so do your voters. If there is no creidbility then the polls are pointless and more and more people will not pay attention to them. Polls will always create talk but, the more consistent and realistic they are the more talk will surround them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DP#1FAN Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 I think they do a good job with this board. It takes alot of time to make this board what it is today. Who cares what the rankings are now it's at the end of the year that matters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvc184 Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 ..... If there is no creidbility then the polls are pointless and more and more people will not pay attention to them. Polls will always create talk but, the more consistent and realistic they are the more talk will surround them. Pointless? Yep, unless you are playing in the BCS, polls are pointless.Consistency in a sports forum? LOL.. right. Read any number of threads on these boards and see the consistency and realistic rationale of arguments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WOS95 Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 Pointless? Yep, unless you are playing in the BCS, polls are pointless.Consistency in a sports forum? LOL.. right. Read any number of threads on these boards and see the consistency and realistic rationale of arguments. i agree, tvc184, u get some karma ;D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bleacher_bum Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 i agree, tvc184, u get some karma ;DI agree with you too!Karma for every one!!!! ;D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest FPHS 78 Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 I can tell you right now-I don't have a vested interest in either teama but I'll put a paycheck on Nederland not being better than West Brook!That is absurd! Nederland and WB play and I'll go WB (-20). They barely lost to the #6 5A team in the state. I would love to hear real justification as to how WB is not the best team in this area. PLEASE!this confuses me.. They barely lost to the #6 5A team in the state. Westfield? Westfield has the third best record IN THEIR DISTRICT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Robert Plant Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 this confuses me.. They barely lost to the #6 5A team in the state. Westfield? Westfield has the third best record IN THEIR DISTRICTDo you think their district (Westfiled's) can be compared to Nederland's or Kelly's. Relax it's just a question. I'm a Nederland, Kelly, WB and Central fan. The polls are for fun. They mean nothing. If everybody has different competition and they do not go head to head, IMO W-L and stats mean nothing. Well, nothing to me anyway. I do believe that WB is the best team in the area but, probably only because I've seen then the most in the last 2-3 years. I try to check out all these teams each year and try more than once. Most tend to support who they're the most familair with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the wise one Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 i think that woodville should be above deweyville Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest FPHS 78 Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 Do you think their district (Westfiled's) can be compared to Nederland's or Kelly's. Relax it's just a question. I'm a Nederland, Kelly, WB and Central fan. The polls are for fun. They mean nothing. If everybody has different competition and they do not go head to head, IMO W-L and stats mean nothing. Well, nothing to me anyway. I do believe that WB is the best team in the area but, probably only because I've seen then the most in the last 2-3 years. I try to check out all these teams each year and try more than once. Most tend to support who they're the most familair with.i was just wondering what 6th rank team he thought WB lost to? 5a or 4a district compared to Kelly? apple/oranges Kelly's tapps district s-u-cks..4 teams, 2 in houston one in austin....sure, polls dont mean anything, but if you are gonna have em, unbeated are usually on top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Robert Plant Posted October 2, 2007 Report Share Posted October 2, 2007 i was just wondering what 6th rank team he thought WB lost to? 5a or 4a district compared to Kelly? apple/oranges Kelly's tapps district s-u-cks..4 teams, 2 in houston one in austin....sure, polls dont mean anything, but if you are gonna have em, unbeated are usually on topIt's probably the 6th ranked team in the Houston area from the Chronicle... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redheaded stepchild Posted October 3, 2007 Report Share Posted October 3, 2007 I shouldn't even waste my time on this "Ranking", but the credibility of this one has definitely been compromised when it comes to many teams, such as HF.They are ranked tied for 15th? Their two losses (2-2) are to the the #1 and #3 and beat #14 handily but yet still ranked below them???? Go figure?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ECBucFan Posted October 3, 2007 Report Share Posted October 3, 2007 Guys, guys! Don't let these rankings eat you up. THEY ARE JUST FOR FUN! Chill! ;D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
treetrunk75 Posted October 4, 2007 Report Share Posted October 4, 2007 i promise hf is better than HJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeDeRlAnD b-DoG fAn Posted October 5, 2007 Report Share Posted October 5, 2007 These polls are just for run so everyone just calm down. I agree Westbrook is a better team than Nederland but Ned is ranked higher cause they are undefeated. This polls mean nothing it doesn't affect anyone's chances from entering the play-offs. All that matters is how good your team plays every week. Good Luck to all the SETX teams! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest edowd Posted October 5, 2007 Report Share Posted October 5, 2007 Ranking should be : if you lined 'em up head to head, who would win.Nederland over WestBrook ?? I don't think so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebs09 Posted October 5, 2007 Report Share Posted October 5, 2007 Shouldn't Kelly's JV ahead of West Hardin? They did beat WH after all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The #42 Posted October 5, 2007 Report Share Posted October 5, 2007 pleeze chester??? top 15?? come on they beat high island and sabine pass not world class teams come on!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
besbolbenbedygud Posted October 6, 2007 Report Share Posted October 6, 2007 If Jed's Crackerberrall University of the South is 5-0 and USC is 4-1.............would that put them in front of USC...........personaly I think Nederland could beat Jed's Crackerberrall U..... ;D.......LoL....I's all in good fun!!!...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silsbee92 Posted October 6, 2007 Report Share Posted October 6, 2007 This is either a showing of tremendous school pride and affiliation or some of these folks had way to many snickers.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts