uknowit2 Posted October 15, 2007 Report Posted October 15, 2007 i agree that Kelly should be number 1 for small school...WOS have proven they are beatableKelly would beat up on East Chambers as well...but i dont know if Kelly could hang with the big dogs just yet...dont get me wrong they could definitley beat up on some of them but not alli realize kelly beat a 5A from Louisiana but i heard there are only like 20 5a schools over there and i also heard that Sulphur has a pretty bad team this year...i just think that just shows ya Texas footballIf Kelly and EC were to play (won't happen of course), I think Kelly might be the favorite. Heck, I might even pick them to win. But to say, hands down, they would "beat up" on EC is a ludicrous. EC is 17-1 over the last 2 years playing similar competition.
Yeoj Posted October 15, 2007 Report Posted October 15, 2007 These rankings are stupid. I dont know who puts them together but they should be banned from sports for a long time. Kelly could beat all of the Big Schools in SETX with MAYBE the exception of west brook and that is a HUGE maybe; however, kelly is still ranked number three in small schools. Good job to whoever does these rankings.I wouldnt let whipping a Louisana team go to my head if I were you. This is Texas football here. West Brook would run Kelly's ass off the field. I think several teams on this list would beat Sulphur just as bad if not worst than your mighty Bulldogs. It was a great win for your program, but lets not get it twisted. We all know Louisana's brand of football is on a lower level than Texas.
bullets13 Posted October 15, 2007 Report Posted October 15, 2007 I think lumberton deserves to be towards the top, but i'd still like to see them beat PNG and Nederland before they're placed ahead of them... I know they're undefeated, but their schedule could've been a little stronger... i think 3rd or 4th might be better right now, with the understanding that if they take PNG or Ned down, that they leapfrog them in the standings... I also believe that if they beat Nederland AND PNG, they should be ranked 1st. i don't think they can beat WB head's up, but if they run the table in district, they deserve to be crowned the best team in the area (unless WB goes undefeated in district as well).
Guest EagleFan01 Posted October 15, 2007 Report Posted October 15, 2007 I wouldnt let whipping a Louisana team go to my head if I were you. This is Texas football here. West Brook would run Kelly's butt off the field. I think several teams on this list would beat Sulphur just as bad if not worst than your mighty Bulldogs. It was a great win for your program, but lets not get it twisted. We all know Louisana's brand of football is on a lower level than Texas.I heard that, not taking anything away from Kelly they did a great job, but Louisiana is not have the teams or play the type of football we play in Texas. If Sulphur was in Texas the way we have the class's set up here they would be a large 3A or small 4A in Texas..
Pimp Smack Posted October 15, 2007 Report Posted October 15, 2007 Dang the Kelly fans are CRAAAZY!!!! First off they would get beat by EC and DESTROYED by WOS. And the only big school around here they could is maybe New Caney. Any of the top 5 big schools would blow Kelly out of the water.
jcb6790 Posted October 15, 2007 Report Posted October 15, 2007 Dang the Kelly fans are CRAAAZY!!!! First off they would get beat by EC and DESTROYED by WOS. And the only big school around here they could is maybe New Caney. Any of the top 5 big schools would blow Kelly out of the water. ill admit i was thinking a little crazy when i said kelly could beat West Brook, but this post was ridiculous. he has never seen kelly play, obviously.
Guest FPHS 78 Posted October 16, 2007 Report Posted October 16, 2007 ill admit i was thinking a little crazy when i said kelly could beat West Brook, but this post was ridiculous. he has never seen kelly play, obviously.yup jcb, kinda went off on that wb statement....but, i'd like to see wos and that running game against the dawgs, stop em cold...and ec? one man team aint goinna beat MKCHS......we aint HJ
Guest FPHS 78 Posted October 16, 2007 Report Posted October 16, 2007 I wouldnt let whipping a Louisana team go to my head if I were you. This is Texas football here. West Brook would run Kelly's butt off the field. I think several teams on this list would beat Sulphur just as bad if not worst than your mighty Bulldogs. It was a great win for your program, but lets not get it twisted. We all know Louisana's brand of football is on a lower level than Texas.hmmm....sulphur is 15-15-2 (Oops make that 15-16-2) against texas schools, looks pretty even ...UNTIL LAST FRIDAY..BOOYAH
sulphurwho? Posted October 16, 2007 Report Posted October 16, 2007 I heard that, not taking anything away from Kelly they did a great job, but Louisiana is not have the teams or play the type of football we play in Texas. If Sulphur was in Texas the way we have the class's set up here they would be a large 3A or small 4A in Texas..Actually eagles fan, sulphur has a larger enrollment than westbrook, almost twice as large, and over 70 players on their varsity roster, this was a great win for kelly and would be for any team in the area, they deserve some more respect around here. no one can touch their run game.
kicker Posted October 16, 2007 Report Posted October 16, 2007 yup jcb, kinda went off on that wb statement....but, i'd like to see wos and that running game against the dawgs, stop em cold...and ec? one man team aint goinna beat MKCHS......we aint HJ uhhh...we aint a one man team, just ask the 5 teams we have beat.
Guest FPHS 78 Posted October 16, 2007 Report Posted October 16, 2007 I heard that, not taking anything away from Kelly they did a great job, but Louisiana is not have the teams or play the type of football we play in Texas. If Sulphur was in Texas the way we have the class's set up here they would be a large 3A or small 4A in Texas..ummmm......wrong.they'd be 5a
KFDM COOP Posted October 16, 2007 Author Report Posted October 16, 2007 If they were to go Public the UIL says they would be put in 4A or higher even if they have 3A numbers.
Guest FPHS 78 Posted October 16, 2007 Report Posted October 16, 2007 If they were to go Public the UIL says they would be put in 4A or higher even if they have 3A numbers.i think he was saying sulphur would be 3a? yeah, kelly would have to play up, like strake..strake's misleading..think they have around 1200 enrollment......but its all boys girls are next door at st agnes
KFDM COOP Posted October 16, 2007 Author Report Posted October 16, 2007 Doesn't Kelly have 3A numbers? I heard they have around 650 or so. Even so if they went Public they would have to play 4A.
Guest FPHS 78 Posted October 16, 2007 Report Posted October 16, 2007 around 450......i think that would be small 3a, wouldnt it?
KFDM COOP Posted October 16, 2007 Author Report Posted October 16, 2007 Yes sir. I spoke to Coach long about it a while back and that's why he don't want to go public because he would have to play 4A.
Yeoj Posted October 16, 2007 Report Posted October 16, 2007 hmmm....sulphur is 15-15-2 (Oops make that 15-16-2) against texas schools, looks pretty even ...UNTIL LAST FRIDAY..BOOYAHJohn Curtis, ranked national and probably the top program in Louisana got beat by Longview a couple weeks back. Kelly, a private school smoked Sulphur another top ranked school in Louisana. I dont know about pretty even. Plus Louisana is not even getting beat by the top schools like Katy and South Lake, they are losing to Kelly. booyah
Guest FPHS 78 Posted October 16, 2007 Report Posted October 16, 2007 John Curtis, ranked national and probably the top program in Louisana got beat by Longview a couple weeks back. Kelly, a private school smoked Sulphur another top ranked school in Louisana. I dont know about pretty even. Plus Louisana is not even getting beat by the top schools like Katy and South Lake, they are losing to Kelly. booyahsulphur is/was .......500 against texas teams... (15-15-2)dont know how much more even you can get then that .how many teams have a winning record against katy or slc......run forest, run
the wise one Posted October 16, 2007 Report Posted October 16, 2007 coop why would they have to play 4a with those numbers wouldnt they be 3a
Guest FPHS 78 Posted October 16, 2007 Report Posted October 16, 2007 coop why would they have to play 4a with those numbers wouldnt they be 3auil would require kelly to play up..like strake in houston playing 5ai dont think the uil is letting anymore private schools change
Guest FPHS 78 Posted October 17, 2007 Report Posted October 17, 2007 Strake has done well in 5A.yup, playing good ball , undefeated until last weeks spanking
KFDM COOP Posted October 17, 2007 Author Report Posted October 17, 2007 I was a little surprised with that!
BearWolf Posted October 17, 2007 Report Posted October 17, 2007 I was a little surprised with that!Cy Falls running back Shane Turner scored five times, and Kolby Gray threw for 404 yards.Strake Jesuit rallied to reduce the point spread by scoring three times in fourth quarter
Recommended Posts