Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Big School 5A-4A

1. West Brook

2. PN-G

3. Lumberton

4. Nederland

5. Dayton

6. Central

7. Memorial

8. Ozen

9. LCM

10.Vidor

Small School 3A-Privates

1. WO-S

2. East Chambers

3. Kelly

4. Buna

5. Newton

6. Kirbyville

7. Jasper

8. Woodville

9. HF

10.Silsbee

11.Orangefield/Hardin

12.Kountze

13.Deweyville

14.Warren

15.Legacy

Posted

looks fairly good, but nederland should be ahead of lumberton.  They have identical records, and both of their losses came to the same team.  If you look at the two teams' overall bodies of work, nederland has played a tougher schedule.  until they play head to head, or unless nederland picks up another loss before then, they should be ahead of l-town.  I'm not trying to take anything away from lumberton, they have a great team.  i'm just saying that nederland's 6-1 has been more difficult to come by than lumberton's 6-1.

Guest FPHS 78
Posted

i remember when lumberton was above wb, coop said he wouldnt put a team with a loss above an undefeated team..does the same not apply to wos? 

Posted

  On 10/22/2007 at 2:46 AM, FPHS 78 said:

i remember when lumberton was above wb, coop said he wouldnt put a team with a loss above an undefeated team..does the same not apply to wos? 

Why does everyone always use us for their examples? Jealous?? ;D

Posted

  On 10/22/2007 at 2:48 AM, KFDM COOP said:

We redid the rankings Sunday with the other sports guys at channel 6. This is how the voting turned out.

Coop, the rankings are fine, but they should be from the SETXsports not anyone else. During the baseball season the TV guys didn't have a veto.

Posted

yeh Coop you said a lot of things that contradict yourself. It seems that I'm not the only one seeing the problems with your rankings. I think there should be a panel outside the setxsports and inside to make votes if you would like a true ranking. Also include more surrounding districts that 22-4a would be playing in the 1st rd play offs. Make the rankings in classes. rank 5a with 5a. 4a with 4a and so on.

Guest Robert Plant
Posted

  On 10/22/2007 at 10:57 PM, goodsport said:

yeh Coop you said a lot of things that contradict yourself. It seems that I'm not the only one seeing the problems with your rankings. I think there should be a panel outside the setxsports and inside to make votes if you would like a true ranking. Also include more surrounding districts that 22-4a would be playing in the 1st rd play offs. Make the rankings in classes. rank 5a with 5a. 4a with 4a and so on.

I think it's fine the way it is now. If you had 5A with 5A it would look like this with no change all year. 1. WB 2. PAM. If you include other districts (5A), there would be alot of teams that several on here would know nothing about or care to know about. This is for the area here and the rankings mean nothing. They are for fun and to make conversation. Kinda like the BCS this year..

Posted

Well then if you say it was for only Southeast texas teams then why was Barbers Hill in the rankings at one time. That was one of the teams in the rankings that was outside any of our districts. I know that it is for fun but it could be even more fun and exciting when you could see the others teams in the play offs that were in the rankings. The ranking system that you have just wouldn't stop at the end of the season. That would also extend it to like a top 25 instead of 10. Change is always good. Try a different flavor every now and then and see what happens.

Posted

Some people get so upset over rankings because their team is not #1. We (WOS) dont really care where you rank us, all we want to do is win. Just like we didnt get upset when Dave C picked K'ville over us in the district. We didnt whine, we just beat them. 8)

Guest FPHS 78
Posted

  On 10/23/2007 at 1:46 AM, kicker said:

Some people get so upset over rankings because their team is not #1. We (WOS) dont really care where you rank us, all we want to do is win. Just like we didnt get upset when Dave C picked K'ville over us in the district. We didnt whine, we just beat them. 8)

then let coop move Kelly up where they belong....where the UNDEFEATED go.  naw, he might have a stroke! ;D

Posted

Coop are you kidden me. that is all you can say. You sent me a message asking me what was wrong with the rankings and I am trying to tell you. Look at what other people are telling you besides me.

Guest Sangster05
Posted

so based on these rankings, you guys really think lumberton is a better team than nederland?

Guest Hatchet
Posted

Come on now demon.  You know one of those schools cheated with ineligible players and had to forfeit. ;D

Guest WeedBegone
Posted

  On 10/23/2007 at 8:53 AM, goodsport said:

Coop are you kidden me. that is all you can say. You sent me a message asking me what was wrong with the rankings and I am trying to tell you. Look at what other people are telling you besides me.

Cmon Goodsport--Be yourself ::) ???

Guest WBFan09
Posted

  On 10/25/2007 at 10:16 PM, Big GANDER said:

where is Baytown Lee? Didn't they beat Memorial?

he is right Coop i thought yall were covering Lee as well last week yall had them ranked...i dont know are we covering them or not?...if so they should be ranked higher than PAM

Posted

  On 10/26/2007 at 1:19 PM, goodsport said:

Hey Coop you reading this? This is the stuff I have been talking about. It looks like it is starting to catch up with ya.

Have you ever stopped to think about the amount of time the administrators put into this site everyday so unappreciative, know-it-alls like you can come on here and pester them about rankings?  Who cares?

Anyone who knows anything about sports knows rankings don't mean squat.  Put up, shut up, or find somewhere else to play.

  • Member Statistics

    46,284
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    BBBB
    Newest Member
    BBBB
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...