Guest FPHS 78 Posted October 29, 2007 Report Posted October 29, 2007 Plain dumb FP. Furr hadn't been decent since the 80's when they use to play Lincoln and we don't know what constitutes "5A" in Louisiana. It could be 1200 kids instead of 1960 in Texas. If Kelly stepped off in the UIL, they should get the same treatment as the Strakes. Put them in 5A regardless of the numbers plus you can't play the same year of a transfer and coaches aren't obligated to release kids for said transfers. I know of 4 starters that came from Ozen, PAM, and WB that wouldn't be playing now....well, sprout.....furr will probably be going to the playoffs this year, they are 2nd in their district ???sulphur has over 2000 kids, that would be a 5a strake is 5a because they would be 4a and play up..kelly would be 4a due to their 3a sized enrollmentbrush up on your facts, then come yapping. :
Guest maverick24 Posted October 29, 2007 Report Posted October 29, 2007 Guys just enjoy your season You dont want any part of 22 4A yall are just like WOS you only talk about being able to beat these teams because you know you won't have to prove it. Yall have a good team but not a 22-4A playoff team! If you had transfer players at other schools trust me some of these 22-4A teams would be even better than they are now. Just play your private schools win your games and be happy.
bullets13 Posted October 29, 2007 Report Posted October 29, 2007 Guys just enjoy your season You dont want any part of 22 4A yall are just like WOS you only talk about being able to beat these teams because you know you won't have to prove it. Yall have a good team but not a 22-4A playoff team! If you had transfer players at other schools trust me some of these 22-4A teams would be even better than they are now. Just play your private schools win your games and be happy. i do believe i'd take WOS in a matchup vs. kelly.
Guest FPHS 78 Posted October 29, 2007 Report Posted October 29, 2007 Guys just enjoy your season You dont want any part of 22 4A yall are just like WOS you only talk about being able to beat these teams because you know you won't have to prove it. Yall have a good team but not a 22-4A playoff team! If you had transfer players at other schools trust me some of these 22-4A teams would be even better than they are now. Just play your private schools win your games and be happy. how many private schools have we played?
Guest maverick24 Posted October 29, 2007 Report Posted October 29, 2007 how many private schools have we played?Sorry call them what you want too, NON UIL Schools
24 over par Posted October 29, 2007 Report Posted October 29, 2007 kelly has a good team this year but 22 4a is too much for them . they would be a bottom tier team in this district
SFA85 Posted October 29, 2007 Report Posted October 29, 2007 well, sprout.....furr will probably be going to the playoffs this year, they are 2nd in their district ???sulphur has over 2000 kids, that would be a 5a strake is 5a because they would be 4a and play up..kelly would be 4a due to their 3a sized enrollmentbrush up on your facts, then come yapping. :Okay mr myoldschoolwasn'tgoodinfootball, Furr is still Furr. I didn't say they wouldn't make the playoffs, I just said they weren't good like they were in the 80's. Beat Yates or LM, then I'm impressed. So sulfur has 2000 kids, LA playoffs are still 3 rounds at the most so again, wake me when y'all play somebody. The Strakes are all boys schools who can recruit so that's why the UIL put them in 5A districts. They had no choice in the matter. I know for a fact, the one on Bellaire and Gessner in Htown has 900 boys.........
BigMoneyTexan Posted October 29, 2007 Report Posted October 29, 2007 Kelly would definately make 22-4a playoffs this year. other years most likely not but this year with all of their seniors for sure. and SFA Chance Filer and Alex Hinton play the same position OLB and they both don't start there are 4 transfers that start you left out Ryan Foxworth from Vidor , but he wasn't recruited he came for other reasons.
BigMoneyTexan Posted October 29, 2007 Report Posted October 29, 2007 just for fun get on maxpreps.com and just scroll through the entire state of texas rankings and tell me what you find... ;D you might have to go farther to find the district 22-4a teams than Kelly
tvc184 Posted October 29, 2007 Report Posted October 29, 2007 Well, if maxpreps says that Kelly will win, then it is settled. Everyone else in 22-4A would be playing for second. :
pigskinmom Posted October 29, 2007 Report Posted October 29, 2007 Well, if maxpreps says that Kelly will win, then it is settled. Everyone else in 22-4A would be playing for second. : ;D
KFDM COOP Posted October 29, 2007 Report Posted October 29, 2007 Well, if maxpreps says that Kelly will win, then it is settled. Everyone else in 22-4A would be playing for second. :
JS Posted October 29, 2007 Report Posted October 29, 2007 this year? they'd win itThis has to be a joke--right? 22-4A would destroy Kelly
MrUmp1 Posted October 29, 2007 Report Posted October 29, 2007 If Kelly were to play UIL they would play 3A. Take their enrollment and double it. They would still be under or around 900 which is 3A.
mustang85 Posted October 29, 2007 Report Posted October 29, 2007 Kelly would not survive in 4A around here.
KFDM COOP Posted October 29, 2007 Report Posted October 29, 2007 If Kelly were to play UIL they would play 3A. Take their enrollment and double it. They would still be under or around 900 which is 3A. True but by UIL rule they would have to play 4A.
Guest Sangster05 Posted October 29, 2007 Report Posted October 29, 2007 good. let them come play 4a for one year. just one year. because thats all it would take for them to realize its not the same brand of football theyre used to playing. coach long knows this, aswell as their new dc jake lefort, they were in the thick of 22 4a for years. and by saying theyd win 22 4a or even make the playoffs is absurd. kf89 said it, they dont have enough depth for one and second not enough team speed. so if kelly did come to 22 4a next year this is what their district schedule could look like.1. vs LCM2. at Nederland3. vs Central4. at Lumberton5. vs Ozen6. at Dayton7. vs Vidor8. at PNGthey MIGHT go 2-6, MIGHT
southern-thunder Posted October 29, 2007 Report Posted October 29, 2007 True but by UIL rule they would have to play 4A. I thought by UIL rule that any private school that chooses to join the UIL must compete in the largest classification that the state has and that would put them 5A.
grizzly62 Posted October 29, 2007 Report Posted October 29, 2007 They might beat Vidor and maybe LCM :-\
Guest Sangster05 Posted October 29, 2007 Report Posted October 29, 2007 good. let them come play 4a for one year. just one year. because thats all it would take for them to realize its not the same brand of football theyre used to playing. coach long knows this, aswell as their new dc jake lefort, they were in the thick of 22 4a for years. and by saying theyd win 22 4a or even make the playoffs is absurd. kf89 said it, they dont have enough depth for one and second not enough team speed. so if kelly did come to 22 4a next year this is what their district schedule could look like.1. vs LCM2. at Nederland3. vs Central4. at Lumberton5. vs Ozen6. at Dayton7. vs Vidor8. at PNGthey MIGHT go 2-6, MIGHT
jcb6790 Posted October 30, 2007 Report Posted October 30, 2007 Terrel Duhram(sp) from OzenBig Baby Randall from OzenChance Filer from PAMAlex Henton from WB.......There maybe more but I'm not sureWRONG!Number one, Kheeston Randall is on his second season at kelly, which makes him eligibleNumber two, Chance and Alex DO NOT startNumber three, like my brother, BIGMONEYTEXAN, said Foxworth, a transfer form vidor, starts.................So if my math ads up that is TWO starters who are ineligible....Terrel and Foxworth
Guest FPHS 78 Posted October 30, 2007 Report Posted October 30, 2007 we are talking this year.....most years Kelly couldnt hang with the worst in 4a, THIS YEAR, is what we are talking about and this years team would go to the playoffs...a-kelly is that goodb-this 4a district is weak this year
Guest FPHS 78 Posted October 30, 2007 Report Posted October 30, 2007 WRONG!Number one, Kheeston Randall is on his second season at kelly, which makes him eligibleNumber two, Chance and Alex DO NOT startNumber three, like my brother, BIGMONEYTEXAN, said Foxworth, a transfer form vidor, starts.................So if my math ads up that is TWO starters who are ineligible....Terrel and Foxworthjcb...cant tell these haters anything! gonna believe what they want. Ingorance is bliss...and these are some mighty blissful folks....ha
Kelly Fan Posted October 30, 2007 Report Posted October 30, 2007 sry to bust your bubble...but i have spoken to both coaches and both have watched PNG and Nederland and Lumberton this year and BOTH say that Kelly could definently win against any of them...
Guest Sangster05 Posted October 30, 2007 Report Posted October 30, 2007 sry to bust your bubble...but i have spoken to both coaches and both have watched PNG and Nederland and Lumberton this year and BOTH say that Kelly could definently win against any of them...i know them both personally, one better than the other, but non the less neither of them would say something like that. they wouldnt say one way or the other.so your sayin if kelly was going to the reservation this week instead of central, that kelly would come out with a win!?
Recommended Posts