Jump to content

Hamshire-Fannett 46 Splendora 47/FINAL


Recommended Posts

  • AggiesAreWe changed the title to Hamshire-Fannett at Splendora/Post updates here
  • AggiesAreWe changed the title to Hamshire-Fannett 46 Splendora 47/FINAL

I think this was Splendora’s first district win. Even with a couple of injuries this one surprised me. HF goes to 2-3 in the first round of district I believe. The Longhorns finish up the first half of district play Tuesday at home against HJ. My biggest question about Tuesday game is how they are gonna go about letting people in the door. It’s a smaller venue even before the Covid spacing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, TrojanWarrior08 said:

So in this district I heard that Livingston was supposed to in the top 4 with Shepherd looking on the outside... Now with the first half of district games played they're sitting at 3rd with a game back of H-J... Hmmm somebody owes someone an explanation lol

I can’t wait to hear this one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When is HF expecting to get all of their starters back? I hope soon, regardless of how high they should have finished in district when healthy, they were definitely a playoff team and that community had high expectations. If they don’t come back soon they might be to far back to climb back into playoff contention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Wise_one said:

When is HF expecting to get all of their starters back? I hope soon, regardless of how high they should have finished in district when healthy, they were definitely a playoff team and that community had high expectations. If they don’t come back soon they might be to far back to climb back into playoff contention.

Hard to say, they are down 3 starters now which explains the lost to Splendora and Sheppard. Their big man went down in the 3rd quarter of the Shepard game with an ankle injury and missed the Splendora game. It's been a rough few weeks for the Horns to say the least. Their bench isn't as good as many thought apparently. They were a solid 6 or 7 man rotation. Losing 3 starters hurt bigtime 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • naw, maaaaybe 7, definitely not 8 deep.  today im avoiding sitting by #10s parents, had to move away yesterday.   "put my son back in jub, put my son back in"  and then crying on every little touch of someone.    lets ball out today ktz!    
    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...