Jump to content

Bridge City 53 Vidor 50/FINAL


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, team first said:

Way to close, but a W is a W 

 

Why is that way too close? You say it like it a foregone conclusion that you were going to get the W. Vidor played a good game and had BC beat in their own gym. Seems to me BC is lucky that they didn’t have to play at Vidor earlier in the season when they got the 1-0 forfeit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • WOSgrad changed the title to Bridge City 53 Vidor 50/FINAL
18 minutes ago, Boneyard Boys said:

Why is that way too close? You say it like it a foregone conclusion that you were going to get the W. Vidor played a good game and had BC beat in their own gym. Seems to me BC is lucky that they didn’t have to play at Vidor earlier in the season when they got the 1-0 forfeit. 

It was way to close for me. Nate and vidor have beaten BC plenty in the last few years. I was hoping BC would have an easier win a home then having to hit a buzzer beater. I was not at the game though, so can’t really give any insight

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, team first said:

It was way to close for me. Nate and vidor have beaten BC plenty in the last few years. I was hoping BC would have an easier win a home then having to hit a buzzer beater. I was not at the game though, so can’t really give any insight

You missed a good one bud, I’m not even mad about the L. It was an awesome game to watch, I know the boys are disappointed but it’s been that way this season. Feel bad for the kid that turned it over and then threw away the inbound but he’ll learn from it and get better. Young man will have a very big role on the team next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McnNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an easy and obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
    • @CIS_org National Security Senior Fellow @BensmanTodd tells Steve Bannon how the U.S. State Department and USAID have been sending American taxpayer funds to religious nonprofits to facilitate mass immigration to our southern border. Bensman says 248 nonprofits are participating in the United Nations’ 2024 agenda to distribute $1.6 billion in cash, transportation, food, and shelter to U.S.-bound immigrants across Mexico and Latin America.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...