Jump to content

Lumberton 57 Vidor 44/FINAL


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

  • WOSgrad changed the title to Lumberton 57 Vidor 44/FINAL
21 minutes ago, SportsJunkie32 said:

Was Lumberton missing any players tonight against a Vidor Team with only 1 district win, scoring only 57 points. I can't wait until the playoffs begin. 

 

15 minutes ago, TxHoops said:

Vidor also got hit hard by Covid.   They are closer to the other teams in the district than their record indicates. 

This is true, the first time we played them they killed us but we were missing our team. See what Silsbee has gone through lately losing to LCM and Vidor. It happens in this district because they don’t reschedule games, they force you to play with what you have or forfeit. It hurt our team bad being shut down right at the start of district, the Pirates are just now starting to round into shape and are playing teams hard the second time through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, underdog15 said:

It’s called being a good sport you don’t shoot when game is out of reach or maybe Lumberton isn’t just use to winning wish there were still 5A so could play a real team like United 

I don’t know what games you have been watching, but I have seen numerous  teams score, dunk and so on with it a lot more then 10 points. if you can’t handle it don’t play it goes both ways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Benchwarmer9 said:

Lumberton has been pretty solid the last 3 years 

Don't feed the troll... I'm sure he knows Lumberton has been solid the last 3 years or so. This guy is just looking for a reason to bash a kid or a program that's been on the rise. Probably because McClure torched little Johnny at some point earlier this year for 40+. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I really don't have an issue with the dunk at the end of the game. But it's kind of an unwritten rule of the game that if you are dribbling out the clock with a double digit lead and the opposing team is allowing you to do so, then you don't take a shot at the last second.

Not saying this was the case here because I was not there.

A little sportsmanship doesn't hurt anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined



  • Posts

    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an easy and obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
    • @CIS_org National Security Senior Fellow @BensmanTodd tells Steve Bannon how the U.S. State Department and USAID have been sending American taxpayer funds to religious nonprofits to facilitate mass immigration to our southern border. Bensman says 248 nonprofits are participating in the United Nations’ 2024 agenda to distribute $1.6 billion in cash, transportation, food, and shelter to U.S.-bound immigrants across Mexico and Latin America.
    • 👍 Oh. I was thinking most thought Wrong Place Wrong Time. Lol. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...