Reagan Posted February 9, 2021 Report Share Posted February 9, 2021 Just heard that when one wants to buy a gun, the Dems wants to have all members of that family psychologically tested before said gun can be bought. Thoughts?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted February 9, 2021 Report Share Posted February 9, 2021 11 minutes ago, Reagan said: Just heard that when one wants to buy a gun, the Dems wants to have all members of that family psychologically tested before said gun can be bought. Thoughts?! I can’t type my thoughts without getting banned. Has Biden been psychologically tested? I would venture a guess and say NO! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardinalBacker Posted February 9, 2021 Report Share Posted February 9, 2021 8 minutes ago, Reagan said: Just heard that when one wants to buy a gun, the Dems wants to have all members of that family psychologically tested before said gun can be bought. Thoughts?! Not just that, but they definitely want to talk to your ex-wife. "To acquire a license, gun owners would have be 21 years old, pass a background check, complete a training course, obtain insurance, and undergo a psychological evaluation. "Military-style" weapons would require an additional training course and license. The proposed psychological evaluation would have to be conducted by a licensed psychologist and require them to interview the spouse, former spouses, and least two other family members or associates of the person applying. Licenses would be automatically denied if the applicant had ever been hospitalized with a "mental illness, disturbance, or diagnosis," including depression, suicidal ideation, or addiction." This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted February 9, 2021 Report Share Posted February 9, 2021 4 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said: Not just that, but they definitely want to talk to your ex-wife. "To acquire a license, gun owners would have be 21 years old, pass a background check, complete a training course, obtain insurance, and undergo a psychological evaluation. "Military-style" weapons would require an additional training course and license. The proposed psychological evaluation would have to be conducted by a licensed psychologist and require them to interview the spouse, former spouses, and least two other family members or associates of the person applying. Licenses would be automatically denied if the applicant had ever been hospitalized with a "mental illness, disturbance, or diagnosis," including depression, suicidal ideation, or addiction." This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up That won’t ever happen in Texas; at least not while I am alive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardinalBacker Posted February 9, 2021 Report Share Posted February 9, 2021 53 minutes ago, baddog said: That won’t ever happen in Texas; at least not while I am alive. If i'm not mistaken, it's a part of the federal firearms act that filed by Sheila Jackson Lee. That would make it a federal issue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted February 9, 2021 Report Share Posted February 9, 2021 8 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said: If i'm not mistaken, it's a part of the federal firearms act that filed by Sheila Jackson Lee. That would make it a federal issue. That dog won’t hunt in Texas. Forget Jackson. Another racist communist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS Wildcats Posted February 9, 2021 Report Share Posted February 9, 2021 Screw the Democrats Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UT alum Posted February 10, 2021 Report Share Posted February 10, 2021 19 hours ago, Reagan said: Just heard that when one wants to buy a gun, the Dems wants to have all members of that family psychologically tested before said gun can be bought. Thoughts?! Where’d you hear that? The same place that “many people have said”? Or maybe, “many people have heard”? Or maybe the place where “many people have heard that many people have said”? Just tryin’ too keep my facts straight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chester86 Posted February 10, 2021 Report Share Posted February 10, 2021 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LumRaiderFan Posted February 10, 2021 Report Share Posted February 10, 2021 21 minutes ago, UT alum said: Where’d you hear that? The same place that “many people have said”? Or maybe, “many people have heard”? Or maybe the place where “many people have heard that many people have said”? Just tryin’ too keep my facts straight. Don't read the news much, do you? You're probably one of those that doesn't REALLY think the democrats want to take our guns...smh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardinalBacker Posted February 10, 2021 Report Share Posted February 10, 2021 54 minutes ago, UT alum said: Where’d you hear that? The same place that “many people have said”? Or maybe, “many people have heard”? Or maybe the place where “many people have heard that many people have said”? Just tryin’ too keep my facts straight. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up “(D) as part of the psychological evaluation, the licensed psychologist interviewed any spouse of the individual, any former spouse of the individual, and at least 2 other persons who are a member of the family of, or an associate of, the individual to further determine the state of the mental, emotional, and relational stability of the individual in relation to firearms. That's pulled directly from the text of the bill, pal. LumRaiderFan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted February 10, 2021 Author Report Share Posted February 10, 2021 57 minutes ago, UT alum said: Where’d you hear that? The same place that “many people have said”? Or maybe, “many people have heard”? Or maybe the place where “many people have heard that many people have said”? Just tryin’ too keep my facts straight. Rush Limbaugh show that was hosted by Todd Herman! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted February 10, 2021 Author Report Share Posted February 10, 2021 I know there are some here that feels like the Constitution is a deterrence to their socialist utopia. But, what were are discussing here has to at the least violate the 4th Amendment to the Constitution! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardinalBacker Posted February 10, 2021 Report Share Posted February 10, 2021 6 minutes ago, Reagan said: I know there are some here that feels like the Constitution is a deterrence to their socialist utopia. But, what were are discussing here has to at the least violate the 4th Amendment to the Constitution! More importantly the 2nd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmashMouth Posted February 10, 2021 Report Share Posted February 10, 2021 I’ll just keep buying them under the table. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted February 10, 2021 Author Report Share Posted February 10, 2021 6 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said: More importantly the 2nd. 100% true. But expanding to family members has to violate the 4th. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmashMouth Posted February 10, 2021 Report Share Posted February 10, 2021 It won’t even pass the house, I don’t think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardinalBacker Posted February 10, 2021 Report Share Posted February 10, 2021 1 minute ago, SmashMouth said: It won’t even pass the house, I don’t think. I'm not so sure... The Ds tend to do a better job of falling in line than the Rs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted February 10, 2021 Report Share Posted February 10, 2021 38 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said: This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up “(D) as part of the psychological evaluation, the licensed psychologist interviewed any spouse of the individual, any former spouse of the individual, and at least 2 other persons who are a member of the family of, or an associate of, the individual to further determine the state of the mental, emotional, and relational stability of the individual in relation to firearms. That's pulled directly from the text of the bill, pal. Well, looks like ex-husbands won’t be able to buy or own a gun. You know those ex-wives will nail them. CardinalBacker and Reagan 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5GallonBucket Posted February 10, 2021 Report Share Posted February 10, 2021 I don’t put anything pass dems. i mean they can’t even see a problem with boys playing dress up to play against girls. A bunch of screwed up individuals. PERIOD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.