Jump to content

Silsbee vs HF


BADSANTA

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, BADSANTA said:

How tall are Silsbee tallest kids?

Grisham I" believe that comes off the bench is 6'4 I believe...But then you have Balltrip that can fly like Barnes could. If Silsbee wins and plays Yates all they need to do is get the big guy #23 in foul trouble get him on the bench" and it's on...!  Kinda reminds me of like a game I've seen before with these two teams..😊👀

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, whsalum said:

HF has a post player that’s a pretty solid player. He was injured midway through the season and looked like he was a little out of shape in the last two games against Huffman and HJ. If the Tigers take him away I don’t think the HF guards shoot it well enough to beat the Tigers

They ain’t worried about HF.  They’ve already moved on to Yates.  
 

(Some of the fans, that is.  I’m sure Sigler is taking HF very seriously and doing everything he can to keep the kids focused.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, BADSANTA said:

How tall are Silsbee tallest kids?

Most of Silsbee's size sits on the bench besides Jones. Tallest are 6`7, 6`4, and three kids who're 6'3. Baltrip (6`0) has the athleticism to play like he's 6`6.

I wish Jones would find a good plyometric workout to do this off season. He'd be a lot more scarier if he could jump.

Williams gets the most playing time off the bench past that. He usually subs in for Jones. I kinda wish we'd let them both play at once. Might help on the boards more.

Will be really interesting to see what the team looks like next year.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HF by 4. Will be a low scoring game. Rideaux will control the tempo in the half court and not allow Silsbee to run which is the main way they score. Who ever controls the tempo wins and I don't think Silsbee is discipline enough due to youth to counter HF scemes. Silsbee hoops, HF plays basketball. Will be a chess match

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined



  • Posts

    • naw, maaaaybe 7, definitely not 8 deep.  today im avoiding sitting by #10s parents, had to move away yesterday.   "put my son back in jub, put my son back in"  and then crying on every little touch of someone.    lets ball out today ktz!    
    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...