Judge Rules MI Sec. of State Benson Directed City Clerks to Ignore Signature Matching Law on Absentee Ballots in Nov. 2020 Election!

[Reagan]

I guess this is also not considered fraud!

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[InMAGAWeTrust]

So umm.. do you not have a job? Or are you retired and leeching off the government social programs? Curious as to how you post all these kook website links, all day.. every day.. every decade.. 

[CardinalBacker]

10 minutes ago, InMAGAWeTrust said:

So umm.. do you not have a job? Or are you retired and leeching off the government social programs? Curious as to how you post all these kook website links, all day.. every day.. every decade.. 

I've always assumed this was him.....

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Might be wrong, tho....

[Realville]

1 hour ago, InMAGAWeTrust said:

So umm.. do you not have a job? Or are you retired and leeching off the government social programs? Curious as to how you post all these kook website links, all day.. every day.. every decade.. 

Facts are hard to debate. Why don’t you attack the message instead of the messenger. You know why? Because it’s truth. Prove that the article is wrong.  Typical Wuss Liberal. 

[InMAGAWeTrust]

4 minutes ago, Realville said:

Facts are hard to debate. Why don’t you attack the message instead of the messenger. You know why? Because it’s truth. Prove that the article is wrong.  Typical Wuss Liberal. 

Listen Jack - the fact is.. Trump got BTFO by Sleepy Joe, even with the incumbent advantage! 
 

Will you wackos just give it up already?!

[Englebert]

1 minute ago, InMAGAWeTrust said:

Listen Jack - the fact is.. Trump got BTFO by Sleepy Joe, even with the incumbent advantage! 
 

Will you wackos just give it up already?!

"Wackos"? Have you ever read your posts?

You attack the person who posted a link to an article instead of debating the merits of the article. "Wackos"? Are you engaging in self-reflection and projection at the same time? We all know you can't debate, and your intellectual skills are severely lacking, so why do you keep trying. Just give it up already!

[InMAGAWeTrust]

2 minutes ago, Englebert said:

"Wackos"? Have you ever read your posts?

You attack the person who posted a link to an article instead of debating the merits of the article. "Wackos"? Are you engaging in self-reflection and projection at the same time? We all know you can't debate, and your intellectual skills are severely lacking, so why do you keep trying. Just give it up already!

Can you guys stop crying about the election already? Come on mannnnnn

[Englebert]

Just now, InMAGAWeTrust said:

Can you guys stop crying about the election already? Come on mannnnnn

Can you quit crying about everything?

[CardinalBacker]

Seriously...  All it actually says is that the Secretary of State said that unless there are substantial discrepancies, signature verification should be presumed to be correct.  In short, inspectors shouldn't say "oh, wait... this Biden vote doesn't have an i dotted like the application...otherwise they're indentical.... throw it out!!!!"

It's also important to note that while Michigan law requires signature verification, it doesn't codify the verification process.  There is no playbook, they were just winging it from polling place to polling place...  until the SOS advised them the best way to proceed, which honestly sounds pretty straightforward to me.

In Michigan, election ocials are required to compare the signature on the voter’s mail-in ballot envelope with the “Qualied Voter File” to “determine the genuineness of [the] signature.” Per Michigan’s recent guidance on signature matching, a signature is deemed insucient only if it has “multiple, signicant, and obvious dierences” from the signature on le. On October 7, 2020, Governor Gretchen Whitmer signed a new bill (Senate Bill 0757) that requires election ocials to notify voters within 48 hours of determining that a signature does not match. If the signature is contested less than 48 hours before election day, ocials must notify voters by 8 p.m. the day before the election. Another recent bill (House Bill No. 5991) would require election clerks to notify voters of signature mismatches and provide cure opportunities until 10 days before the election is certied. That bill was referred to the Michigan House Committee on Elections and Ethics on July 23, 2020, but appears unlikely to pass before Election Day.

 

And as always, the article provided absolutely zero evidence of the much bally-hooed  "election fraud," just instructions that the Trumpers didn't like because it kept them from throwing out Biden votes.

[baddog]

48 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

Seriously...  All it actually says is that the Secretary of State said that unless there are substantial discrepancies, signature verification should be presumed to be correct.  In short, inspectors shouldn't say "oh, wait... this Biden vote doesn't have an i dotted like the application...otherwise they're indentical.... throw it out!!!!"

It's also important to note that while Michigan law requires signature verification, it doesn't codify the verification process.  There is no playbook, they were just winging it from polling place to polling place...  until the SOS advised them the best way to proceed, which honestly sounds pretty straightforward to me.

In Michigan, election ocials are required to compare the signature on the voter’s mail-in ballot envelope with the “Qualied Voter File” to “determine the genuineness of [the] signature.” Per Michigan’s recent guidance on signature matching, a signature is deemed insucient only if it has “multiple, signicant, and obvious dierences” from the signature on le. On October 7, 2020, Governor Gretchen Whitmer signed a new bill (Senate Bill 0757) that requires election ocials to notify voters within 48 hours of determining that a signature does not match. If the signature is contested less than 48 hours before election day, ocials must notify voters by 8 p.m. the day before the election. Another recent bill (House Bill No. 5991) would require election clerks to notify voters of signature mismatches and provide cure opportunities until 10 days before the election is certied. That bill was referred to the Michigan House Committee on Elections and Ethics on July 23, 2020, but appears unlikely to pass before Election Day.

 

And as always, the article provided absolutely zero evidence of the much bally-hooed  "election fraud," just instructions that the Trumpers didn't like because it kept them from throwing out Biden votes.

Aren’t you a Trumper? You supposedly voted for him twice. How can you denounce Trumpers when you are one yourself?

[CardinalBacker]

14 hours ago, baddog said:

Aren’t you a Trumper? You supposedly voted for him twice. How can you denounce Trumpers when you are one yourself?

Because voting for Trump doesn’t make one a Trumper. Believing that he turned water into wine and actually won the election in 2020 like you do makes one a Trumper. 

[baddog]

54 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

Because voting for Trump doesn’t make one a Trumper. Believing that he turned water into wine and actually won the election in 2020 like you do makes one a Trumper. 

Man, you can surely make up some good stuff just to be standoffish. Your Jesus comparison is childish at best. People stopped taking you seriously a long time ago due to such quips.

[LumRaiderFan]

27 minutes ago, baddog said:

Man, you can surely make up some good stuff just to be standoffish. Your Jesus comparison is childish at best. People stopped taking you seriously a long time ago due to such quips.

If choosing Trump over what we have now makes me a Trumper, I'm in.

Your post is spot on on all counts.

[Reagan]

19 hours ago, InMAGAWeTrust said:

So umm.. do you not have a job? Or are you retired and leeching off the government social programs? Curious as to how you post all these kook website links, all day.. every day.. every decade.. 

So, did the judge not make this ruling?  Or do you just choose to ignore that part?

[Realville]

34 minutes ago, Reagan said:

So, did the judge not make this ruling?  Or do you just choose to ignore that part?

Like I said He’s too ignorant and stupid to attack the message (truth) so he attacks the messenger. Truth doesn’t have to defend itself. A lie repeated a thousand times is still a lie. 

[EAGLEFOREVER]

On 3/17/2021 at 3:29 PM, CardinalBacker said:

Seriously...  All it actually says is that the Secretary of State said that unless there are substantial discrepancies, signature verification should be presumed to be correct.  In short, inspectors shouldn't say "oh, wait... this Biden vote doesn't have an i dotted like the application...otherwise they're indentical.... throw it out!!!!"

It's also important to note that while Michigan law requires signature verification, it doesn't codify the verification process.  There is no playbook, they were just winging it from polling place to polling place...  until the SOS advised them the best way to proceed, which honestly sounds pretty straightforward to me.

In Michigan, election ocials are required to compare the signature on the voter’s mail-in ballot envelope with the “Qualied Voter File” to “determine the genuineness of [the] signature.” Per Michigan’s recent guidance on signature matching, a signature is deemed insucient only if it has “multiple, signicant, and obvious dierences” from the signature on le. On October 7, 2020, Governor Gretchen Whitmer signed a new bill (Senate Bill 0757) that requires election ocials to notify voters within 48 hours of determining that a signature does not match. If the signature is contested less than 48 hours before election day, ocials must notify voters by 8 p.m. the day before the election. Another recent bill (House Bill No. 5991) would require election clerks to notify voters of signature mismatches and provide cure opportunities until 10 days before the election is certied. That bill was referred to the Michigan House Committee on Elections and Ethics on July 23, 2020, but appears unlikely to pass before Election Day.

 

And as always, the article provided absolutely zero evidence of the much bally-hooed  "election fraud," just instructions that the Trumpers didn't like because it kept them from throwing out Biden votes.

The best way to avoid fraud is to not allow mail in ballots period. Just as it was never allowed before.

[CardinalBacker]

I didn't create these... but they sure came across my fb feed.

[CardinalBacker]

[CardinalBacker]

[CardinalBacker]

[CardinalBacker]

Yeah.... Trumpism isn't a cult.

[LumRaiderFan]

11 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

Yeah.... Trumpism isn't a cult.

Biden is killing us and you're still worried about Trump.  

Great job on providing evidence about the Trump cult, must have taken you all night...lol.

[InMAGAWeTrust]

1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said:

I didn't create these... but they sure came across my fb feed.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

I see this stupid BS all the time on my feed lol. And it’s always the absolute dumbest MF’ers I knew from grade school who share it 24/7.. I’m talking people in the bottom 10% academically, the your/you’re there/their type crowd..

 

makes complete sense how they fall for it. They’re literally too stupid to know any better, and it’s not really their fault.. 

 

 

[LumRaiderFan]

For every one of those CB posted, you can find 100 like the one below...of course I wouldn't expect that kind of effort from the TDS crowd.

 

[baddog]

2 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

I didn't create these... but they sure came across my fb feed.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

This must be why you voted for him TWICE. I still think you’re a liar.