-
Member Statistics
46,202
Total Members1,837
Most Online
-
Posts
-
By WOSdrummer99 · Posted
This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up -
His verdict was not overturned on evidence. The unethical prosecutor, whose decision itself was overturned, was allowed to stand. Here is an example. A guy crossed the street and commited jaywalking. A guy driving a car had to swerve to miss the guy who is jaywalking. After getting in an argument, the driver attempts to drive away and the guy who jaywalk shoots and kills him in basically a road rage incident. He is arrested for murder For political reasons, the prosecutor tells the jaywalker, if you plead guilty to the pedestrian traffic charge, we will drop the murder charge. Naturally, he agrees, knowing that he’s been given a gift for appearance. Another prosecutor comes along and asked on appeal to reinstate the murder charges. An appeals court agrees saying that there is an apple evidence for such a charge. They go to trial and the prosecution is able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that murder was committed. In steps to state Supreme Court. While it is obvious that all of the evidence was valid and it’s obviously that the murder was proven beyond a reasonable doubt, because the special prosecutor allowed the murder suspect to plead guilty to a traffic ticket, he can’t be charged again for murder under double Jeopardy. -
Mmm bop. Bop ba doo.. mmm bop doo. Bop by-doo. Kaufman wins this game and I'll sing that backwards -
This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up -
-
-
Topics
-
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.