Jump to content

Straight March

5GallonBucket

By 5GallonBucket
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

SmashMouth
SmashMouth

That’s total BS. Just because you interview them doesn’t mean you have to hire them. Why are you so prejudiced? Goodness know you know about discrimination, yet you think it’s ok to discriminate again

LumRaiderFan
LumRaiderFan

A celebration of normalcy.

baddog
baddog

We can make stuff up. It’s what a race card does for people. If an employer has to hie someone strictly because of their sexual preference, then I have been discriminated against. Of course you w

baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Big girl said:

No one is discriminated against and ostracized for being straight. So, what's the point?

We can make stuff up. It’s what a race card does for people.

If an employer has to hie someone strictly because of their sexual preference, then I have been discriminated against. Of course you won’t understand that concept because you possess a race card.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BS Wildcats

BS Wildcats

Posted
Posted
38 minutes ago, baddog said:

We can make stuff up. It’s what a race card does for people.

If an employer has to hie someone strictly because of their sexual preference, then I have been discriminated against. Of course you won’t understand that concept because you possess a race card.

Or if one requires a lower test score or easier test, then I have been discriminated against.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hagar

Hagar

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, baddog said:

We can make stuff up. It’s what a race card does for people.

If an employer has to hie someone strictly because of their sexual preference, then I have been discriminated against. Of course you won’t understand that concept because you possess a race card.

And a gender card.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ty Cobb

Ty Cobb

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, baddog said:

We can make stuff up. It’s what a race card does for people.

If an employer has to hie someone strictly because of their sexual preference, then I have been discriminated against. Of course you won’t understand that concept because you possess a race card.

The same can be said about the Rooney rule in the nfl. Teams MUST interview a person, for a coaching position, that is not white before they can hire anyone. How on earth is this not a racist rule?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Hagar said:

And a gender card.

Gender card. That could get interesting. Does one have to stick to their classification or can they change it as often as needed per circumstance? By filling their quotas, it may get to where they eventually “have to” hire a straight, white male.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Big girl

Big girl

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, Ty Cobb said:

The same can be said about the Rooney rule in the nfl. Teams MUST interview a person, for a coaching position, that is not white before they can hire anyone. How on earth is this not a racist rule?

Because they wouldn't hire a qualified black coach,  at all. It"s sad that they had to make the rule ; in order to, give qualified blacks a chance. Remember when the general consensus was that black men were not smart enough to be a NFL quaterback? Some people also thought that an all black starting 5, on a basketball team, were not smart enough to win a championship 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, Big girl said:

Because they wouldn't hire a qualified black coach,  at all. It"s sad that they had to make the rule ; in order to, give qualified blacks a chance. Remember when the general consensus was that black men were not smart enough to be a NFL quaterback? Some people also thought that an all black starting 5, on a basketball team, were not smart enough to win a championship 

 

 

Yes, but you people are never satisfied. You want a black owner, entire coaching staff, scouts, trainers, agents, merchandising, concessions, players, and fans. You want it all, so don’t even come at me with that equality crap. I don’t believe it for one second.

Back on topic: I am straight and proud of it. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BS Wildcats

BS Wildcats

Posted
Posted
43 minutes ago, Big girl said:

Who has an easier test?

I’m pretty sure the postal exam is configured so that minorities are more likely to meet the minimum required for employment, one example.  Although the test isn’t easier, but lower SAT scores will get a minority admitted strictly because of ethnicity.  But yet, you and others scream white privilege.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Reagan

Reagan

Posted
Posted
58 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said:

I’m pretty sure the postal exam is configured so that minorities are more likely to meet the minimum required for employment, one example.  Although the test isn’t easier, but lower SAT scores will get a minority admitted strictly because of ethnicity.  But yet, you and others scream white privilege.  

I’m still a firm believer that the U. S. postal service is nothing more than a jobs program for minorities.  How else can you explain them losing billions and billions of dollars each year and nothing ever done about it?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Big girl

Big girl

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, baddog said:

Yes, but you people are never satisfied. You want a black owner, entire coaching staff, scouts, trainers, agents, merchandising, concessions, players, and fans. You want it all, so don’t even come at me with that equality crap. I don’t believe it for one second.

Back on topic: I am straight and proud of it. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

I never said that. Qualified blacks should be hired, period

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Big girl said:

I never said that. Qualified blacks should be hired, period

 

“You” collectively as a people. “You” don’t have to be the one to say it, just simply believe it. If all of that were to happen, I’m sure you would be concerned about “qualified whites” not getting hired. See what I mean?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOSdrummer99

WOSdrummer99

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Reagan said:

I’m still a firm believer that the U. S. postal service is nothing more than a jobs program for minorities.  How else can you explain them losing billions and billions of dollars each year and nothing ever done about it?!

Well that's just govt in general. And we, as shareholders, continue to pay for it. Do you ever get the wrong package from FedEx?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmashMouth

SmashMouth

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Big girl said:

Because they wouldn't hire a qualified black coach,  at all. It"s sad that they had to make the rule ; in order to, give qualified blacks a chance. Remember when the general consensus was that black men were not smart enough to be a NFL quaterback? Some people also thought that an all black starting 5, on a basketball team, were not smart enough to win a championship 

 

 

That’s total BS. Just because you interview them doesn’t mean you have to hire them. Why are you so prejudiced? Goodness know you know about discrimination, yet you think it’s ok to discriminate against non black races. 
Do you think that they should also be required to interview Mexicans, Chinese, Indians or other people of color or are you satisfied as long as a black person gets interviewed. 
What about women? Shouldn’t they get a chance? Shouldn’t we try to give the job to a LGBR549 person that’s in the midst of a gender change?

WHERE DOES IT END????????????    

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Reagan

Reagan

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

Well that's just govt in general. And we, as shareholders, continue to pay for it. Do you ever get the wrong package from FedEx?

Can’t say I ever have.  For the socialist here, this is a good lesson when a company that’s in it for a profit has to watch it’s p’s and q’s.  It’s just sad that we allow agencies to lose billions of dollars each year and not a darn thing is ever done!  Plus, I think there’s a postal union.  WHY?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, SmashMouth said:

That’s total BS. Just because you interview them doesn’t mean you have to hire them. Why are you so prejudiced? Goodness know you know about discrimination, yet you think it’s ok to discriminate against non black races. 
Do you think that they should also be required to interview Mexicans, Chinese, Indians or other people of color or are you satisfied as long as a black person gets interviewed. 
What about women? Shouldn’t they get a chance? Shouldn’t we try to give the job to a LGBR549 person that’s in the midst of a gender change?

WHERE DOES IT END????????????    

549…..Lmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    46,207
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Separation Scientist
      Barbers Hill (28) vs La Porte (55) - FINAL

      By Separation Scientist · Posted

      That should tell everyone something pretty clearly. Does anyone really think BH is recruiting elementary kids, to get them to transfer in Jr. high? Seriously? Here is the "dirty little secret" about BH: Most people move to the district for a quality living environment to raise their young family, and benefit from the outstanding acedemics at BH. Even If all athlectics suddenly disappeared from BH, people would still want their kids in the district. If thats not enough to convince anyone, and BH really was determined to recruit, first step would be to have open enrollemnt. It is closed.        Yes, I get it, no one ever wants to give BH the benefit of the doubt on anything. Some of the accusations are beyond ridiculous though. This paranoia the BH critics are afflicted with is not just sad, its flat out laughable.     
    • setxathlete14
      Livingston Open

      By setxathlete14 · Posted

      Opting is always an option. Are they considering any BC assistants? Highly qualified after that season they put up. 
    • SmashMouth
      Waco La Vega (42) vs West Orange-Stark (20) - FINAL

      By SmashMouth · Posted

      Be that as it may, only time will tell. Hide and watch. Don’t be surprised if the next HC hire uses his own recipe. That happens more than not historically. I am not arguing the point that Hooks & CT had a winning combination that could’ve been carried over. I’m saying that finding someone to do that is not going to be as easy as one might think. Tell me again why Saban’s replacement, who even has Saban’s assistance if he wants it, just lost another game to an unranked team and has taken the Tide out of playoff contention? Why wouldn’t he just follow the success of possibly the greatest college football coach ever lived? 
    • WOSdrummer99
      Waco La Vega (42) vs West Orange-Stark (20) - FINAL

      By WOSdrummer99 · Posted

      We've acknowledged having 2 HOF coaches hasn't been like most other schools. So why everyone jumps to the conclusion it wouldn't work here is beyond my comprehension. I see it carry over with these other hires. Gilmer, Aledo, North Shore, Austin Westlake. Next man up that continues the system in place has instant success. Matter fact there was 2 rookie HC that won the state championship the same year we handed over the keys. Same book. Same recipe. Better ingredients.
    • Reagan
      Trump Wins

      By Reagan · Posted

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...