Jump to content

Vaccination Food For Thought


bullets13

Recommended Posts

From the article:  "President Donald Trump criticized the next phase of vaccine distribution as a scheme by biotech giant Pfizer to make more money.  Discussing the topic of vaccine booster shots with Fox Business’ Maria Bartiromo, the president said it makes total financial sense for Pfizer to distribute as many jabs as possible.

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Were the Pfizer ‘Vaccines’ Approved Because They Establish a Perpetual Need for Booster Shots?   

From the article:  "The FDA’s approval of the Pfizer “vaccine” for Americans over the age of 16 drew questions from many, even those who support distribution of the vaccines. Pfizer’s drug has performed the worst against the Delta Variant, especially compared to Moderna. Moreover, the “protection” from the drug against all variants of Covid-19 appears to wane after around 6-months.

And perhaps that’s the point. Pfizer is primed to be the main distributor of the so-called “booster” shots with the infrastructure in place to offer them to a large chunk of the world’s population at intervals of three to six months. As odd as it may seem to those of us who want to see a return to normal rather than the “new normal” they seem to be creating around us, it makes perfect sense to both the indoctrinators and the indoctrinated..."

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Reagan said:

Deaths in 80%-Vaccinated UK Up TENFOLD From This Time Last Year When Zero Were Vaccinated!

This is the hidden content, please

The beauty of these tabloid style websites is they can spin stuff and there’s always someone dumb enough to believe what they’re pushing.  So, having taken a whole ten seconds to google “England Covid deaths”, i can explain what’s going on. If you google those magic words, there’s a handy chart that shows deaths in England from Covid.  Last year in august, which was well before the first major spike there, there were a couple of weeks where they had a nice low death rate in England.  A few people a day.  Keep in mind, this was before Covid had fully taken off.  Covid deaths in England started rising shortly after, and skyrocketed to well over 1000 deaths a day from December to February.  Then the vaccinations started.  And guess what: deaths dropped to single digits for months.  Now we’re seeing reduced effectiveness in the vaccines after 6 months or so, and mutations in the virus because not enough people did enough to achieve herd immunity, and cases are rising again.  But, in what is England’s 2nd worst outbreak so far, England is still currently averaging under 100 deaths a day.  At their peak in February they averaged over 1100 deaths a day.  I wonder why the author of your brilliant investigative piece didn’t compare current death rates to the last major spike that England had in cases, but instead chose a time with a lull in cases before things got bad there… oh wait, so people like you would read it, do no research, and regurgitate their stupidity.  Perhaps the author should look into why England is seeing their second worse outbreak so far, seeing roughly 70% of the number of cases that they had in their worse outbreak, but only seeing about 8% of the number of deaths. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/25/2021 at 12:59 PM, Reagan said:

Memphis Teen Football Player Who Died of COVID Was Vaccinated, Mom Says!

 

This is the hidden content, please

100 people die of Covid and 2 are vaccinated and to you that’s proof that the vaccine doesn’t work.  I’d suggest you quit wearing a seatbelt as well, but I’m sure you already don’t to protect your “personal liberties.”  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, bullets13 said:

100 people die of Covid and 2 are vaccinated and to you that’s proof that the vaccine doesn’t work.  I’d suggest you quit wearing a seatbelt as well, but I’m sure you already don’t to protect your “personal liberties.”  

OK, glad you are letting us know you are against personal liberties!  At least we now know where your core is and why you make certain statements!    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Reagan said:

OK, glad you are letting us know you are against personal liberties!  At least we now know where your core is and why you make certain statements!    

Haha.  I’m against personal stupidities.  I notice that you post all of these misleading or outright false articles, and then anytime someone shows a little proof of their falseness you never respond.  I’m not surprised that THIS is the post you responded to, and that you ignored the real point.  That said, if you were making arguments regarding personal liberties, I’d be fine with that.  I’ve said on here several times that I can respect someone’s choice to not get the vaccine.  But I have zero respect for someone who spreads lies to influence other people’s decisions, and that’s literally all you do, all day long.  You post fake articles and fake studies and slanted news in an effort to “prove” the vaccine doesn’t work.  No source is too dubious or misleading.  As long as it fits your lies, you post it.
 

The local hospitals have been posting their hospitalization numbers lately.  On an average day they’ll be something like: 260 patients, 20 fully vaccinated.  85 in ICU, 7 fully vaccinated.  40 on ventilators, 1 full vaccinated.  You’re the kind of guy that will read those numbers and say “there’s a fully vaccinated person on a ventilator at St. Elizabeth.  Vaccines don’t work!” And then devote an hour trying to convince people not to get vaccinated.  It’s asinine.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined



  • Posts

    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an easy and obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
    • @CIS_org National Security Senior Fellow @BensmanTodd tells Steve Bannon how the U.S. State Department and USAID have been sending American taxpayer funds to religious nonprofits to facilitate mass immigration to our southern border. Bensman says 248 nonprofits are participating in the United Nations’ 2024 agenda to distribute $1.6 billion in cash, transportation, food, and shelter to U.S.-bound immigrants across Mexico and Latin America.
    • 👍 Oh. I was thinking most thought Wrong Place Wrong Time. Lol. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...