Jump to content

Not the smartest local criminal


bullets13

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, tvc184 said:

Let’s see, I’m a convicted felon so I’m going to drive on a public street and shoot a dog. 

He gets a two for one deal there. It is a felony to shoot the dog and then another felony for processing the firearm to begin with. 

Is that right?

I know a couple of people that still shoot dogs for showing up on their property... while it's a bad idea, I didn't realize that it was felonious.  

Nice use of that adjective, huh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

Is that right?

I know a couple of people that still shoot dogs for showing up on their property... while it's a bad idea, I didn't realize that it was felonious.  

Nice use of that adjective, huh?

To be legal they have to be attacking a pet, person, or livestock.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

Is that right?

I know a couple of people that still shoot dogs for showing up on their property... while it's a bad idea, I didn't realize that it was felonious.  

Nice use of that adjective, huh?

It is a felony to kill a cat or a dog if it is not yours without the consent of the owner. If it is a wild animal (feral), it has no owner and is a felony.

As B13 stated, you can kill an animal in self-defense or if it is attacking your livestock. I believe you would have a hard time trying to say you killed a cat in self-defense. If a Rottweiler, Doberman, Chow, etc., was attacking a person,  I am sure It would justify shooting it.

So if you shoot that wild neighborhood cat sleeping on top of your car with a pellet gun and get caught and prosecuted, you could potentially do time in prison.

In my opinion and knowing Texas law.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

Is that right?

I know a couple of people that still shoot dogs for showing up on their property... while it's a bad idea, I didn't realize that it was felonious.  

Nice use of that adjective, huh?

And just for informational purposes in reference to wild or feral cats and dogs being protected even though they have no owner and may be on your property, The law says it is unlawful to kill an animal without consent of the owner or to torture the animal. The question becomes, what is an animal?

This is a quote from the Texas Penal Code in reference to cruelty to non-livestock animals: "Animal" means a domesticated living creature, including any stray or feral cat or dog, and a wild living creature previously captured.

“Including any stray or feral”’is significant  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, 5GallonBucket said:

Are deer considered livestock

As SM said, no unless you’re raising them, probably under a permit, for food. Wild animals are not livestock.

This is the Texas Penal Code definition of livestock:

(5) "Livestock animal" means:(A) cattle, sheep, swine, goats, ratites, or poultry commonly raised for human consumption;

(B) a horse, pony, mule, donkey, or hinny;

(C) native or nonnative hoofstock raised under agriculture practices; or

(D) native or nonnative fowl commonly raised under agricultural practices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tvc184 said:

As SM said, no unless you’re raising them, probably under a permit, for food. Wild animals are not livestock.

This is the Texas Penal Code definition of livestock:

(5) "Livestock animal" means:(A) cattle, sheep, swine, goats, ratites, or poultry commonly raised for human consumption;

(B) a horse, pony, mule, donkey, or hinny;

(C) native or nonnative hoofstock raised under agriculture practices; or

(D) native or nonnative fowl commonly raised under agricultural practices.

Good info

im pretty much surrounded by deer lease and some of the hunters in the past have talked about shooting dogs....

I have 3 Anatolian/Great Pyrenees mixes....during deer season I keep them fenced in but every so often they get out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 5GallonBucket said:

Good info

im pretty much surrounded by deer lease and some of the hunters in the past have talked about shooting dogs....

I have 3 Anatolian/Great Pyrenees mixes....during deer season I keep them fenced in but every so often they get out

Unfortunately some hunters will definitely shoot dogs that come out in their lanes during deer season.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saw on the News last week some yahoo dropping off an Alaskan Husky in a desolate area.  Beautiful dog that chased the SUV down the road as they were leaving.  Not sure how anyone could do that.  Someone else filmed it and the Law is after them now.

On a plus note, a family adopted the dog.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hagar said:

Saw on the News last week some yahoo dropping off an Alaskan Husky in a desolate area.  Beautiful dog that chased the SUV down the road as they were leaving.  Not sure how anyone could do that.  Someone else filmed it and the Law is after them now.

On a plus note, a family adopted the dog.

I see it all the time on my road

somebody dropped of kittens that were maybe 2 days old....we took them and bottle fed them....they are 6 years old now. And they kill plenty of mice, snakes and cardinals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/30/2021 at 7:06 PM, 5GallonBucket said:

Good info

im pretty much surrounded by deer lease and some of the hunters in the past have talked about shooting dogs....

I have 3 Anatolian/Great Pyrenees mixes....during deer season I keep them fenced in but every so often they get out

I have dogs on my lease all the time.  I don’t like them there, but I wouldn’t shoot one unless it was growling at me on my way to the stand or something.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • That’s a heck of a take there. If you could just remove Kountze’s top 6-7 players, you got them.
    • naw, maaaaybe 7, definitely not 8 deep.  today im avoiding sitting by #10s parents, had to move away yesterday.   "put my son back in jub, put my son back in"  and then crying on every little touch of someone.    lets ball out today ktz!    
    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...