Jump to content

West Brook 27 United 13/FINAL


Aggieswife

Recommended Posts

  • bullets13 changed the title to West Brook 27 United 13/Game Called @ Halftime
1 hour ago, Yeoj said:

Even a broke clock is right twice a day. Dude will be hoping for rain delay and weather cancelations for every game the rest of the season. @BMTSoulja1 know what that second half was going to be about. 

Second half more than likely wouldn’t brought about some halftime adjustments.  You know our local coaches seem to have an affinity for not making on the fly adjustments.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

You wish.  I was actually excited about that second half starting… 🤷🏾‍♂️

Stop lying. Bryce was on his way to being player of the week for the entire country against that weak United defense. You were already crying on this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

It’s not in the books as a WB win, guy.  What’s wrong with you?  Again, I’ll be active on the WB threat vs. ‘Cita and NS and I’ll actively call out your lack of energy.  

What does Atascocita and North Shore have to do with WB beating United? I guess I'll use your logic and ask you why are you hanging on 'Cita and NS jock straps. And, they said on the broadcast that it is a West Brook win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Yeoj said:

What does Atascocita and North Shore have to do with WB beating United? I guess I'll use your logic and ask you why are you hanging on 'Cita and NS jock straps. And, they said on the broadcast that it is a West Brook win.

I was talking about that other fan.  You, unlike him, are here posting even when WB gets murked. He disappears.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • AggiesAreWe changed the title to West Brook 27 United 13/FINAL

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined



  • Posts

    • naw, maaaaybe 7, definitely not 8 deep.  today im avoiding sitting by #10s parents, had to move away yesterday.   "put my son back in jub, put my son back in"  and then crying on every little touch of someone.    lets ball out today ktz!    
    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...