Supreme Court Strikes Down Joebama Eviction Moratorium!

[Reagan]

From the article:  "The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued the moratorium..."  This is clearly the illegal part!  More from the article:  "“It would be one thing if Congress had specifically authorized the action that the CDC has taken. But that has not happened,” the Court majority wrote..."   CDC clearly has no authority to make these decisions.  This was a 6-3 decision.  The 3 in this decision clearly are all activist.  They know good and well that what the CDC was doing was illegal.  But they voted to uphold it anyway.  This is not an issue that there might be some legalities to it.  These 3, especially the 2 that obama put on, are clearly interested in doing what the socialist want and NOT what the law says!!  

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[Derf Nosneb]

1 hour ago, Reagan said:

From the article:  "The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued the moratorium..."  This is clearly the illegal part!  More from the article:  "“It would be one thing if Congress had specifically authorized the action that the CDC has taken. But that has not happened,” the Court majority wrote..."   CDC clearly has no authority to make these decisions.  This was a 6-3 decision.  The 3 in this decision clearly are all activist.  They know good and well that what the CDC was doing was illegal.  But they voted to uphold it anyway.  This is not an issue that there might be some legalities to it.  These 3, especially the 2 that obama put on, are clearly interested in doing what the socialist want and NOT what the law says!!  

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Come on man, stop piling on Slow Joe. He's having a bad few days thats all. Time for KamalToe to the rescue, as soon as she figures out "The root cause"...

[Chester86]

If I own property and someone has failed to pay their rent - repeatedly - then you should have an easy path to evicting those tenants.  If the government held that decision up, then the government should have to pay that note.  This is really a no-brainer.  

[CardinalBacker]

1 hour ago, Chester86 said:

If I own property and someone has failed to pay their rent - repeatedly - then you should have an easy path to evicting those tenants.  If the government held that decision up, then the government should have to pay that note.  This is really a no-brainer.  

The government doesn't pay anything... the taxpayers do.  How much are you personally willing to spend to help these unfortunate tenants who haven't paid their rent in months (even if they are working/drawing unemployment)?  

[baddog]

1 hour ago, Chester86 said:

If I own property and someone has failed to pay their rent - repeatedly - then you should have an easy path to evicting those tenants.  If the government held that decision up, then the government should have to pay that note.  This is really a no-brainer.  

Evicting a non paying tenant is not as easy as some believe. My MIL found that out the hard way…… no, it wasn’t me. 

[Chester86]

That was my point - the govt shouldn’t tell me what to do with tenants I have a binding contract with.  There is a reason I do not get involved in the rental property market.  

[InMAGAWeTrust]

2 hours ago, Chester86 said:

 If the government held that decision up, then the government should have to pay that note.  This is really a no-brainer.  

heh you’d think.. the government handed out billions, maybe trillions, in literally free money over the past 2 years. Unfortunately, and as expected, most of it went right into the hands of corporations and people with sham LLCs

of course, the only time I see outrage is when some poor guy is mad at their fellow poor neighbor because he took advantage of some unemployment (relative) chump change payout