Jump to content

Question for Vidor folks


wbfan

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, Cougar14.2 said:

That’s correct. Flannigan was here and Matthews was trying to get a notable game on the schedule. Crosby admin said no and the next year they fired him for losing to Vidor in the first round. It was the greatest thing that happened to Crosby football because it got us Riordan and now Prieto. Matthews probably got an extension off those Ins. Since you already realize y’all haven’t don’t anything since then I won’t comment on that portion. 

So going full circle, he said it backfired, because y’all ended up having to play the Pirates anyway. Like it or not, the logic is there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said:

So two times qualifies as "several"?

There is never going to be a season go by that someone from Vidor or the GT doesn’t bring up the time the Pirates beat Crosby on this site.  Regardless of the fact that they are always a sub .500 team that struggled to make a 4-team playoff scenario in a year they dropped down a division. It’s all good though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CCRed said:

There is never going to be a season go by that someone from Vidor or the GT doesn’t bring up the time the Pirates beat Crosby on this site.  Regardless of the fact that they are always a sub .500 team that struggled to make a 4-team playoff scenario in a year they dropped down a division. It’s all good though.

SeeRed, why does it matter to you then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CCRed said:

There is never going to be a season go by that someone from Vidor or the GT doesn’t bring up the time the Pirates beat Crosby on this site.  Regardless of the fact that they are always a sub .500 team that struggled to make a 4-team playoff scenario in a year they dropped down a division. It’s all good though.

Seems like a touchy subject.  We'll make sure to keep pressing on that nerve!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SmashMouth said:

So going full circle, he said it backfired, because y’all ended up having to play the Pirates anyway. Like it or not, the logic is there. 

I guess I’m looking more for how it actually backfired instead of just the semantics. Crosby chose not to play in 2010 during realignment, Vidor beat Crosby at the end of the 2011 season. If anything the game was beneficial for Crosby because it led us down the path to better coaches. Vidor’s coach was sub .500 before he beat Crosby and has been sub .500 since. I’m just trying to figure out why Vidor fans bring up a win from 10 years ago more than that fact? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cougar14.2 said:

I guess I’m looking more for how it actually backfired instead of just the semantics. Crosby chose not to play in 2010 during realignment, Vidor beat Crosby at the end of the 2011 season. If anything the game was beneficial for Crosby because it led us down the path to better coaches. Vidor’s coach was sub .500 before he beat Crosby and has been sub .500 since. I’m just trying to figure out why Vidor fans bring up a win from 10 years ago more than that fact? 

Whatever makes you sleep good at night...kittykat14.2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Member Statistics

    46,202
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    CHSFalcon
    Newest Member
    CHSFalcon
    Joined



×
×
  • Create New...