Jump to content

GABBY PETITO MISSING - BOYFRIEND REFUSES TO COOPERATE


thetragichippy

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Separation Scientist said:

So I turn on the TV this morning, and Fox News Lead Story is, not the broken US border, not Covid, not the economy, but of course gabby. But it hardly stops there. They interview New York Congressman Lee Zeldin, who talks about the FBI involvement in the gabby case, and then wait for it... the now international effort involved. O.M.G.

Its hard to wrap ones mind about the national and now international gabby obsession, and at this point, I would even say the global collective sickness surrounding gabby. Its gone flat out Mental.    

Millions of people watch 48 Hours and other such investigative and particularly homicide shows. They are very popular.

This is no different than the other shows except it’s playing out in front of their eyes. People are simply interested. Where did the crazy boyfriend go? Is the family helping to cover it up? Are they going to find him dead having committed suicide like about 90% of the people think is going to happen? Is he going to be cornered by the police and have a standoff and a shoot out?

The border is not intriguing. Everybody knows what’s happening. There is no mystery like there is in the Gabby case. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a diverse group of coworkers, they are glued to their phones and computer screens 24/7, all but ignoring their work, sitting there in a trance like state, obsessed with gabby 24/7. Work and duty is suffering. This is far beyond any simple "interest". This is a sickness. The UN needs to get involved, PRONTO!!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Separation Scientist said:

I have a diverse group of coworkers, they are glued to their phones and computer screens 24/7, all but ignoring their work, sitting there in a trance like state, obsessed with gabby 24/7. Work and duty is suffering. This is far beyond any simple "interest". This is a sickness. The UN needs to get involved, PRONTO!!! 

Everybody wants to be the first to know so they can text or Twitter or a post something on Facebook. “Hey, they just found his boyfriend dead with a suicide note. I KNEW IT!!!”. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, baddog said:

This is the hidden content, please

He's upset and rightly so.....but what he says goes against Brian's rights to an attorney. 

"As far as the law is concerned this law firm may be immune due to attorney/client privilege," Steven Petito 

This is the hidden content, please
 on Tuesday. 

"But in the eyes of the public you are as guilty and complicit with this massive cover-up and stalling tactic," the uncle said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, thetragichippy said:

He's upset and rightly so.....but what he says goes against Brian's rights to an attorney. 

"As far as the law is concerned this law firm may be immune due to attorney/client privilege," Steven Petito 

This is the hidden content, please
 on Tuesday. 

"But in the eyes of the public you are as guilty and complicit with this massive cover-up and stalling tactic," the uncle said.

I agree, but not if this attorney aided his disappearance or tried to cover it in any way. If this guy is not guilty, a good attorney would have suggested he talk with police to help find Gabby. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, baddog said:

I agree, but not if this attorney aided his disappearance or tried to cover it in any way. If this guy is not guilty, a good attorney would have suggested he talk with police to help find Gabby. 

People are making lots of assumptions about this case. I don't think an attorney would try and cover up a murder for some stranger off the street so they could be charged with a crime....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, thetragichippy said:

Arrest warrant issued for Brian Laundrie for 'unauthorized use' of credit cards related to Gabby Petito case
 

This is the hidden content, please

A means to legally get him in handcuffs? Even the article says, “while this warrant allows law enforcement to arrest….”. I think this is to change him from a missing person to a wanted felon.

Remember that Timothy McVeigh who blew up the federal building in Oklahoma City was arrested for a license plate violation. 

Like always, every state and federal laws are different. It does not say who’s credit card he used so it could be a legitimate theft. It can also belong to Gabby and in Texas it would be almost a meaningless charge. It is not against the law to use someone else’s debit or credit card. It is against the law to use it without consent. This guy was engaged to Gabby. They probably swapped credit cards several times. There is almost no way they could prove without her statement that he did not have consent to use it. They would have to almost prove murder first and if they prove that, why worry about a credit card charge?

Again, it is probably a felony charge meaning that if he is arrested anywhere, he can be extradited across state lines. It is a police tactic and a means to an end, in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, tvc184 said:

A means to legally get him in handcuffs? Even the article says, “while this warrant allows law enforcement to arrest….”. I think this is to change him from a missing person to a wanted felon.

Remember that Timothy McVeigh who blew up the federal building in Oklahoma City was arrested for a license plate violation. 

Like always, every state and federal laws are different. It does not say who’s credit card he used so it could be a legitimate theft. It can also belong to Gabby and in Texas it would be almost a meaningless charge. It is not against the law to use someone else’s debit or credit card. It is against the law to use it without consent. This guy was engaged to Gabby. They probably swapped credit cards several times. There is almost no way they could prove without her statement that he did not have consent to use it. They would have to almost prove murder first and if they prove that, why worry about a credit card charge?

Again, it is probably a felony charge meaning that if he is arrested anywhere, he can be extradited across state lines. It is a police tactic and a means to an end, in my opinion.

I was waiting on you……lol

I had that same feeling of a pretty stupid Charge, but I also thought it might tell us they have nothing else. It almost looks like all the evidence they went through has not produced any evidence that he killed her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, thetragichippy said:

I was waiting on you……lol

I had that same feeling of a pretty stupid Charge, but I also thought it might tell us they have nothing else. It almost looks like all the evidence they went through has not produced any evidence that he killed her.

It is called a pretext stop or fishing expedition. The police can make a lawful detention or arrest but are not really looking for the reason of the detention or arrest.

A police officer stops you at 2 AM with your license plate light out. Are you intoxicated? Do you have warrants? Does something in your car make it appear that you were committing a crime? Or perhaps the officer is really concerned about your license plate light out and the safety hazard you are creating…..

Of course we will never know but there might be enough information for an arrest warrant for murder right now. Remember a warrant just needs probable cause (which is defined as, would a reasonable person believe, knowing what the officer knows)  and nowhere near proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Even if they have enough information to technically get a valid warrant for murder, do you want to tip your hand or rush to do something that may be called into question later (was the probable cause for murder valid?) when you now have a legal felony on him?

I would not read too much into a credit card warrant instead of a murder warrant at this point. It may be absolutely true that they don’t have enough for murder… but maybe…..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, tvc184 said:

A means to legally get him in handcuffs? Even the article says, “while this warrant allows law enforcement to arrest….”. I think this is to change him from a missing person to a wanted felon.

Remember that Timothy McVeigh who blew up the federal building in Oklahoma City was arrested for a license plate violation. 

Like always, every state and federal laws are different. It does not say who’s credit card he used so it could be a legitimate theft. It can also belong to Gabby and in Texas it would be almost a meaningless charge. It is not against the law to use someone else’s debit or credit card. It is against the law to use it without consent. This guy was engaged to Gabby. They probably swapped credit cards several times. There is almost no way they could prove without her statement that he did not have consent to use it. They would have to almost prove murder first and if they prove that, why worry about a credit card charge?

Again, it is probably a felony charge meaning that if he is arrested anywhere, he can be extradited across state lines. It is a police tactic and a means to an end, in my opinion.

This YouTube channel from  Nate the Lawyer says almost exactly what I said. They were engaged. To have enough to prove he didn’t have consent by her death, you would have to prove that he knew she was dead.

He goes a little farther and findssome stupid clerical errors by the FBI. Basically  they indicted him on one charge but put different charge on the warrant. It would be like me doing a probable cause affidavit that you shoplifted something at Walmart (Theft) but then wrote assault on the warrant.  There are two crimes listed in the section on credit cards under federal law. One is to use the card or the number without consent. The other is that you use fraud or forgery to fake the card like maybe he tried to transfer it in his name. They indicted him on the one but wrote the warrant on the other.

Will that clerical error invalidate the warrant? If they arrest him on a warrant that is later found to be insufficient or wrong, that would throw out any confession or any evidence they gathered after making the arrest. That seems pretty sloppy by the FBI. I think they need to get the judge to remove the warrant and simply re-issue it under the correct charge for the indictment but who knows, maybe they will uphold it like it is.

But Nate did this video two hours ago. Maybe he was reading my comments from yesterday… 😂😂😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,204
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TJ_40
    Newest Member
    TJ_40
    Joined



×
×
  • Create New...