Jump to content

DCTF Week 8 State Rankings


AggiesAreWe

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, aTmfan06 said:

Even with a subscription they don’t show teams in 4A ranked 10-25. Now the computer rankings do but those rankings have teams in different spots than the AP polls

 

 

What’s the computer rankings. Maxpreps rankings were strange. They had LCM at 7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said:

This is the hidden content, please

Local teams in these rankings:

 

6A

#6 Atascocita

#9 North Shore

#22 CE King

 

5A DI

#2 College Station

 

4A DII

#1 Carthage

#4 West Orange-Stark

 

3A DII

#6 Newton

 

2A DI

#3 Timpson

 

2A DII

#9 Tenaha

Interesting that Atascocita is ahead of North Shore!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Reagan said:

Interesting that Atascocita is ahead of North Shore!  

North Shore lost to an unranked Westfield at the time and doesn't have really have any great wins on their schedule to date. Atascocita went on the road and beat a top 5 ranked Allen and their loss was on the road to a top 5 ranked Guyer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LCMAlumtiger32 said:

I understand strength of-schedule determines rankings but i believe Vidor should be in the top 20. I imagine the points in this game will determine a lot. 

I seen someone say that SOS, penetrations, and points help determine rankings, which would make sense. But I think our points for/points allowed doesn't help our case. But I thought we should be in the top 20 too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting that the old Midland Lee, now Legacy, is the only 6A school in the rankings that is not in the 4 largest greater metro areas of the state.  The power in the top classification has long ago shifted to those areas.  Gone for the most part are the days of the smaller metros having great teams.  Beaumont and Longview did have the 2 teams in the 6A Div II championship a few years ago, but that was an aberration over the last 20 or so years.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an easy and obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
    • @CIS_org National Security Senior Fellow @BensmanTodd tells Steve Bannon how the U.S. State Department and USAID have been sending American taxpayer funds to religious nonprofits to facilitate mass immigration to our southern border. Bensman says 248 nonprofits are participating in the United Nations’ 2024 agenda to distribute $1.6 billion in cash, transportation, food, and shelter to U.S.-bound immigrants across Mexico and Latin America.
    • 👍 Oh. I was thinking most thought Wrong Place Wrong Time. Lol. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...