Jump to content

Livingston at LCM


BattlinBear02

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Mr. Buddy Garrity said:

Every Livingston offensive highlight last night I saw a messed up snap, so I expect several turnovers. 

 

Give me the Bears by 4 TDs. 

You’re right about bad snaps. Lions had several plus off the mark pitches, fumbles, int. Their offense definitely had issues. Your prediction seems about right unless they really improve in a weeks time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Tim Riggins said:

You’re right about bad snaps. Lions had several plus off the mark pitches, fumbles, int. Their offense definitely had issues. Your prediction seems about right unless they really improve in a weeks time. 

I think #99 has a lot to do with the bad snaps. Everyone we have played this year has had bad snaps. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, marshman said:

LCM should win this pretty easily, but having said that, nothing is a given and on any Friday night anything could happen. Hope this doesn’t become a trap game for the Bears.

That’s what I’m worried about. Coming in the game thinking the game is already over. I’ve seen LCM struggle with teams they should have blown out. Livingston was one of them a few years ago. I think LCM beat them like 21-0 and everyone else dropped 50 on them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LCMAlumtiger32 said:

LCM playing bad ball? Are Livingston came in to play?

LCM was dominant in the first quarter but as the year has taught us the second-quarter can be rough. Livingston intercepted a tipped ball on the Bears side of the field and almost ran it in with 3 minutes left. Bears defense and a few penalties held them to a field goal. Look to see the Bears adjust. Livingston is no slouch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • naw, maaaaybe 7, definitely not 8 deep.  today im avoiding sitting by #10s parents, had to move away yesterday.   "put my son back in jub, put my son back in"  and then crying on every little touch of someone.    lets ball out today ktz!    
    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...