Jump to content

Texas City 49 Port Neches-Groves 42/Final OT


AggiesAreWe

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, CCRed said:

Is it really “throwing” a game ?  Might just want to give the starters a rest before playoffs start. They have already clinched the #1 seed. 

After Nederland put the smack down on Crosby last year and et them know about it!!!..I hardly doubt Crosby would rest their starters! Come on Man!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, the weasel said:

After Nederland put the smack down on Crosby last year and et them know about it!!!..I hardly doubt Crosby would rest their starters! Come on Man!

There’s that too.  But I personally would give the starters the night off. There is something to say about keeping the offensive timing down too though.  We will have to see what the coach does. Two starters didn’t suit up this week and several two’s started on both sides.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, the weasel said:

After Nederland put the smack down on Crosby last year and et them know about it!!!..I hardly doubt Crosby would rest their starters! Come on Man!

Beat Nederland or go into the playoffs healthy, hmmmmm what’s more important? Obviously the objective is not to lose any game, but being healthy would be priority #1 then staying sharp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, FrodoNDN said:

So if TC beats BH, whom do the Indians face?

You would get Galena Park and their slot-t. It’s the one matchup I was worried about our district losing outside of FBM. PNG should blow GP out but GP is kind of physical, they’re kind of fast, their defense is kind of good and that offense is kind of hard to stop. If PNG has an inefficient night on offense and GP can shorten the game on them they might be in trouble. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My point of reference is PN-G v. Crosby and PN-G v. TC.  Watching those two games, the second unit for Crosby will still beat TC.  The Stingarees have a physical and quick DL/LB group, but not a lot of size and they were not as disruptive as what I saw from Crosby.  At times, the PN-G OL pushed around TC.  The secondary for TC was supposed to be good, but the Indians had open WRs.  In contrast, the Crosby DL was disruptive from start to finish, and there were smaller windows to make throws.  That's just me.  I'm not a coach.  That was my eye test.

Against TC, PN-G was back in the business of giving away a win...we gave one to Nederland and then felt generous when playing TC.  If the Indians play clean games against Nederland and TC, throw the ball to people wearing purple/white, and wake up the secondary and special teams coaches from their Friday night naps, PN-G would be sitting in second place.  Instead, we give away wins.  On top of that, last night during OT, we have 1st and goal, the OL had some momentum holding its own at the line of scrimmage, and Trahan is a good HS RB.  The Indians do not give their run game a shot to score?  Frustrating play calls in OT.  Great play calls in the 2Q and 3Q.  Gave our offense momentum.  Frustrating 1Q and 4Q.  We allow a wing-T team to throw the ball around like Joe Montana to Jerry Rice?  Everyone in the stadium knows TC needs to steal a possession and will likely try an onside kick, but we do not coach up our kids to be prepared?  In OT, we abandon the run game with 1st and goal?  Giving away wins...frustrating.  Kids gave good effort.

I'll still be there next Friday watching the purple/white Indians vs. the green Indians.  Go Big Purple!  Good luck to the other district teams...Crosby...BH...TC.  Get ready for a good playoff push.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, 1989NDN said:

Giving away wins...frustrating.  Kids gave good effort.

I disagree that PNG gave away the win. They were down in the first half, then stormed back and then it was a hard fought game. Both teams had good plays and both had mistakes. But if you really want to talk about giving away...... that fumble on the 1 yard line TC had on the kickoff was the easiest score I've seen in a long time. Thats +7 right there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, aledoalumni said:

I disagree that PNG gave away the win. They were down in the first half, then stormed back and then it was a hard fought game. Both teams had good plays and both had mistakes. But if you really want to talk about giving away...... that fumble on the 1 yard line TC had on the kickoff was the easiest score I've seen in a long time. Thats +7 right there. 

True.  We got a lucky break there.  We still had +14 going into the 4Q and lose the 4Q/OT 28-7.  That is giving away the game when you can't cover a wing-T team throwing the ball, when you know they need to steal a possession and you look unprepared, or when you have 1st and goal and never give the ball to your RB running behind an OL that had some push.  Credit to TC for making the plays to win the game, but, my opinion, PN-G helped them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, 1989NDN said:

True.  We got a lucky break there.  We still had +14 going into the 4Q and lose the 4Q/OT 28-7.  That is giving away the game when you can't cover a wing-T team throwing the ball, when you know they need to steal a possession and you look unprepared, or when you have 1st and goal and never give the ball to your RB running behind an OL that had some push.  Credit to TC for making the plays to win the game, but, my opinion, PN-G helped them.

You didn't give squat away....Nederland and TC both beat you. Excuses are cheap, suck it up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, 1989NDN said:

True.  We got a lucky break there.  We still had +14 going into the 4Q and lose the 4Q/OT 28-7.  That is giving away the game when you can't cover a wing-T team throwing the ball, when you know they need to steal a possession and you look unprepared, or when you have 1st and goal and never give the ball to your RB running behind an OL that had some push.  Credit to TC for making the plays to win the game, but, my opinion, PN-G helped them.

If you mean PN-G helped them by getting  outplayed, then yes PN-G helped them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/29/2021 at 10:53 PM, Coach85 said:

Fairclothe was trying to get his son a TD to tie it. If it got tied then it would have been the same thing. I can’t believe y’all haven’t figured this out yet.

"Daddyball". That stuff sadly happens. I have seen it many times elsewhere in recent years past. Last names matter.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, prepballfan said:

Every team finds their way down save a Newton or WOS. If you think you are exempt from it just wait a little longer. 

I have those little magnetized football pics of my sons stuck to a file cabinet in my office. Random dude, who turned out to be a vendor, walks in and looks at them and says, “Man, y’all whipped our a$$”. Had never seen the guy before so I asked where he was from and he said Port Neches. 
 

Long story short we talked about ball for about 30 mins. Dude was knowledgeable as heck. He played for Burnett and I happened to mention I thought BF was a pretty decent coach. Boy, that was the wrong thing to say. If you paraphrase out the expletives he basically said PNG isn’t playing with any honor or pride, and used the Crosby game as an example. Also said the tradition doesn’t matter if the kids that are playing now weren’t alive to see it. 
 

I mentioned that because the gist of what he was saying is that PNG doesn’t have the same type players they did when he was there 20 years ago. He said he thinks the kids are just a lot softer and the only way to get different results is with a different coach but said the last thing he would do is get rid of BF because you don’t know what you would get as a replacement. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,204
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TJ_40
    Newest Member
    TJ_40
    Joined



  • Posts

    • noticed that 99.99% of law enforcement sides with Trump? The part of the judicial system who disagrees with Trump is the prosecutors and judges….and it’s certainly not all of them either. Good thing he has the judges that really count on his side. 
    • What news station do you watch?…..never mind.    What age are the children you take care of. Refugees from where? Are they in a hospital? Now children compared to criminals…..geeeez. The mayor of Denver and a few governors, including Newsom, have said they will not turn over incarcerated criminals to ICE. This is a felony. They are harboring criminals and fugitives. Gee, I’m so glad you want criminals protected. Anyone who crossed illegally into our country is a criminal. Happy Holidays to you and yours.
    • Sorry sir on my miss count. I was in hurry
    • Are they offering refuge to criminals? Or is it a Trump talking point? Refugees are people who leave their country due to unwarranted prosecution. I actually take care of 2 refugee kids who have complex medical needs   No, refugees are not criminals, and the assumption that they are more likely to be criminals than the general population is incorrect:                                                                                          Research shows immigrants commit crimes at lower rates Immigrants in the United States commit crimes at lower rates than the U.S.-born population, including unauthorized immigrants. This is true across immigrant groups.                  Immigration doesn't raise crime rates Immigrants don't raise crime rates in the communities where they settle. In fact, some studies suggest that immigration can lower crime rates, especially violent crime.                  Anti-immigration politicians have spread a myth Anti-immigration politicians have repeatedly tried to link immigrants to crime, but research shows this is a myth.                  Refugees don't cause crime in Turkey A study found that refugees don't have a causal effect on crime rates in Turkey. In fact, the study found that refugees may have a negative effect on crime rates per capita. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...