Jump to content

Lumberton at Vidor


SmashMouth

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, BelichikYoSelf said:

That is an interesting perspective.   Is it mostly legal to hit a Passing Q in the knee cap?  Is it mostly legal to crack back into the box on a linebacker or D End from a slot in the knee cap?   
 

or are those artistically illegal?  I am by far an expert but I think Hi/lows (chop blocks) are illegal because they break femur bones and destroy ACLs.  
 

Vidor may or may not Chop Block but I doubt anyone in football including Vidor coaches feel that blocking up high to stand them up and in the “blink of the eye” smashing a knee cap or femur bone down low is artistic.  

I only said "mostly legal" because if there is not enough separation between blocks, it can be perceived (especially by a low paid high school ref) as a chop block - even though it is not. A cut block within in the tackles is definitely legal. It's just a high block by player A - a moment of separation, then a cut block by player B. It's an excellent combo especially on a backside pass block.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SmashMouth said:

I only said "mostly legal" because if there is not enough separation between blocks, it can be perceived (especially by a low paid high school ref) as a chop block - even though it is not. A cut block within in the tackles is definitely legal. It's just a high block by player A - a moment of separation, then a cut block by player B. It's an excellent combo especially on a backside pass block.

I agree. Big difference in a cut and a chop.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, BelichikYoSelf said:

Vidor may or may not Chop Block but I doubt anyone in football including Vidor coaches feel that blocking up high to stand them up and in the “blink of the eye” smashing a knee cap or femur bone down low is artistic.

You are very descriptive - I don't think anyone one mentioned "smashing a knee cap or femur bone". Just for clarity, a cut block doesn't mean using a knife. Figured I would head that one off at the pass... 😆

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BelichikYoSelf said:

Have they?  Is that legal?  
 

do you know what a Low crack block is?  Is that legal? 

 

 

Just now, BelichikYoSelf said:

By a WR split out it is not legal anymore. By a pulling Guard or fullback sometimes legal. 

It all depends on your definition of a crack back. If a receiver goes in motion, for instance, clears the tackle, the ball is handed off to a RB and the receiver blocks the LB above the waste then it's definitely legal. But you are correct, a wideout can't commit the good old blindside block anymore...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, PirateNole984 said:

"By a WR split out" ... do you know the positions in football SMH.  

No I do not apparently.  

 

WR split out Wide.  I edited it so you now understand that sometimes WR aren’t split out wide.   Sometime WR are bunched up right next your TE or Tackle. 
 

you sure you played college football?Or are you just trying sound super duper cool.  
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BelichikYoSelf said:

No I do not apparently.  

 

WR split out Wide.  I edited it so you now understand that sometimes WR aren’t split out wide.   Sometime WR are bunched up right next your TE or Tackle. 
 

you sure you played college football?Or are you just trying sound super duper cool.  
 

 

Just for clarity. If they are not split out wide, then they are considered a Split End. Off the line in close is a Slot Receiver. It's a fair mistake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BelichikYoSelf said:

No I do not apparently.  

 

WR split out Wide.  I edited it so you now understand that sometimes WR aren’t split out wide.   Sometime WR are bunched up right next your TE.  
 

you sure you played college football?Or are you just trying sound super duper cool.  
 

 

Whether a WR is bunched in tight, split out wide, motioned to the back field (unless he is handed the ball, then becomes a RB)...STILL A WR or other titles like, slot, split can be used.  And yes, I just wanna be a super cool dude saying I played college football.  What benefits would I gain from saying that?  Learn to explain and comprehend before you start spouting off like you're Ed Hochuli.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, PirateNole984 said:

Whether a WR is bunched in tight, split out wide, motioned to the back field (unless he is handed the ball, then becomes a RB)...STILL A WR or other titles like, slot, split can be used.  And yes, I just wanna be a super cool dude saying I played college football.  What benefits would I gain from saying that?  Learn to explain and comprehend before you start spouting off like you're Ed Hochuli.

 

 

Oh I had the comprehension problem.  Got it Super Duper cool Dude.  
 

For the record a WR Handed a ball in the backfield or anywhere else on the field is probably still a WR.  Only now he is a WR running with a football in his hand.  
 

But like I said I’m no expert and didn’t play college football.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well you don't have to worry much about Vidor WRs coming at you with a crack back block or chop block. They rarely ever split anyone out wide, mostly everything comes from the bunch formation. I think what the original complainer was seeing on the film was the Pirates throwing their cut blocks on every play, they definitely teach that. Vidor has a well known reputation for cutting you and its a major part of our blocking scheme. Of course they are trying to execute the blocks legally, whether or not it's a penalty, well that's up to the interpretation of the referees,. All I can say is there hasn't been a big problem with chop block flags this season, that to me means they are executing their blocks very well. Cause you definitely know when we get called for one, those things are drive killers for the Pirates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, BelichikYoSelf said:

Anyway.  Let’s get back on topic. 
 

Can the Vidor Pirates actually win this game without using illegal rolling starts?  
 

 

Oh boy, here's another issue. You only have to come set for what, maybe a second? But since ya'll are bringing it up, we have been flagged for that. Illegal procedure, men in motion penalty has been called quite a few times this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,204
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TJ_40
    Newest Member
    TJ_40
    Joined



  • Posts

    • noticed that 99.99% of law enforcement sides with Trump? The part of the judicial system who disagrees with Trump is the prosecutors and judges….and it’s certainly not all of them either. Good thing he has the judges that really count on his side. 
    • What news station do you watch?…..never mind.    What age are the children you take care of. Refugees from where? Are they in a hospital? Now children compared to criminals…..geeeez. The mayor of Denver and a few governors, including Newsom, have said they will not turn over incarcerated criminals to ICE. This is a felony. They are harboring criminals and fugitives. Gee, I’m so glad you want criminals protected. Anyone who crossed illegally into our country is a criminal. Happy Holidays to you and yours.
    • Sorry sir on my miss count. I was in hurry
    • Are they offering refuge to criminals? Or is it a Trump talking point? Refugees are people who leave their country due to unwarranted prosecution. I actually take care of 2 refugee kids who have complex medical needs   No, refugees are not criminals, and the assumption that they are more likely to be criminals than the general population is incorrect:                                                                                          Research shows immigrants commit crimes at lower rates Immigrants in the United States commit crimes at lower rates than the U.S.-born population, including unauthorized immigrants. This is true across immigrant groups.                  Immigration doesn't raise crime rates Immigrants don't raise crime rates in the communities where they settle. In fact, some studies suggest that immigration can lower crime rates, especially violent crime.                  Anti-immigration politicians have spread a myth Anti-immigration politicians have repeatedly tried to link immigrants to crime, but research shows this is a myth.                  Refugees don't cause crime in Turkey A study found that refugees don't have a causal effect on crime rates in Turkey. In fact, the study found that refugees may have a negative effect on crime rates per capita. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...