If you need a laugh….

[Chester86]

This article made me shake my head and it just kept getting better after each paragraph.  Absolutely nothing, and I mean NOTHING happened to the campaign bus but their feelings were hurt.  They were scared, I think it even said “terrified” for their own personal safety.  They were headed to Austin for a rally, so I’m sure once they hit their “safe space” they just hugged and cried relieved they made it thru their ordeal.  Oh, and they filed a law suit regarding the non-response from law enforcement - talk about frivolous (nothing happened and no one was hurt).  Here is the article:

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[BS Wildcats]

Snowflakes 

[tvc184]

This sends to be the premise of the federal lawsuit…. 
“The lawsuit alleges San Marcos Police chose not to provide the Biden bus with a police escort despite multiple requests, and even refused “to take reasonable steps to protect both Plaintiffs’ safety and their foundational democratic rights.”

Maybe their lawyers haven’t read the Supreme Court decision in Castle Rock v. Gonzalez.

In CR, it wasn’t feelings or we were scared and you wouldn’t provide a safe space. In CR a woman had a restraining order against her estranged husband. A few weeks later he kidnapped them and the woman called the police and urged them to go find  her husband because her children were in danger. The police refused and told her to wait until later to see if he brings them back. He did not bring them back but rather murdered all three children and brought them to the police station. There he died in a shootout with the police.  The Supreme Court ruled that there is no constitutional guarantee of police protection. There might be statutory state laws that demand the police respond to a situation but there is nothing in federal law nor the United States Constitution guarantees protection.

So let’s see, the murder of three children with the police refusing to look for them is not unconstitutional but having feelings hurt is?