Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Hagar said:

Biden claimed he was angry at the verdict.  The same Joe Biden that called the kid a White Supremist.  The same Joe Biden that has a son who’s guilty of drug use.  Guilty of lying on a gun application.  Probably guilty of treason, and Joe wants this kid to go to jail.  That’s our President.  What a jerk.

This is the hidden content, please

Rittenhouse should sue the 💩out of braindead biden!

Posted
1 hour ago, Big girl said:

Didnt he take a pic with a member of the Proud Boys

According to this article by the NY Post, It is all a hoax, like most of the accusations about Rittenhouse.

If somebody says something and then a second person repeats it, it becomes fact to many people. 

This is the hidden content, please

Posted
9 hours ago, InMAGAWeTrust said:

Not surprised to see you still defending loser George, and baddog (the Jan 6th traitor) “thanking” your post 

SETX in a nutshell 

I was not speaking of George, rather Kyle who (while not innocent of poor decisions) was innocent of murder. 
 

I can’t help who likes my posts. Hell, I think everyone likes my posts. Even you. I’m just that kinda guy. 

Posted
11 hours ago, Hagar said:

Who Biden?  Might have…. There are pictures of Biden with the Exalted Cyclops of the Ku Klux Klan. Perhaps that’s what you’re referring too.

True enough, lol. What Big Girl doesn’t seem to understand is that the Grand Dragon of the KKK has the “right” to defend himself also. Even if she hates him, which I’m sure she does, she can’t just walk up and shoot him without consequences. At least he’s a “legal” American.

Why would Big Girl be upset that Rittenhouse killed two white guys? She never makes sense, just hits and runs with her one liners that have no bearing on the case at all. Did “Proud Boys” come up in the trial? Would having one’s picture taken with Proud Boys sway jurors towards a guilty verdict? Should BG go on trial for supporting BLM, a group led by Marxists?

Posted
10 hours ago, tvc184 said:

According to this article by the NY Post, It is all a hoax, like most of the accusations about Rittenhouse.

If somebody says something and then a second person repeats it, it becomes fact to many people. 

This is the hidden content, please

I found the CNN issue of claiming Zimmerman made a racial slur on 911 call and then (like ABC and NBC) recanted. 
 

This is the hidden content, please

 Since this was brought up about Trayvon Martin and Rittenhouse, can we see (or even agree) that the media reports outright lies? People repeat such false media statements as facts and it is self perpetuating. We see it still today with Rittenhouse.

There are still people that believe lies put out intentionally by the media about Zimmerman.  I have shown ABC, NBC and CNN putting out unquestionably false information. After they were caught, every one of them recanted their “news”. I can guarantee that there are people today that will claim Zimmerman called in on a black kid, had no injuries and made racial slurs on the 911 call, all of which are false by the three major news outlets’ on admissions. 

CNN and others ran wild with the story of Nicholas Sandmann taunting Native Americans along with other white male  Catholic students…. until it was (again) found out to be false. I think CNN and the Washington Post have settled out of court for up to $250 Million for their false statements.

And yet, here we are at the Rittenhouse protests, with a repeat of the same false information that is again put out by the national media.

There is free enterprise money to be made by the media. It depends on viewership and clicks on Internet sites. To get more money or for political agendas or both, much of the media routinely puts out false information. We can watch it case after case. It would not be that big of a deal if people saw the false news stories and realize them for what they are. The problem lies when people believe the original reports that fit their own opinions (likely gained by other false rhetoric) and then ignore when the truth is revealed.

Posted

Hey Big Girl. Look up Joseph D. Rosenbaum’s rap sheet (no, he is not a rapper). Heck, I’m glad he is dead. Rittenhouse unknowingly rid the world of a sex pervert. You really kill me as to who you have their back.

Heck, I’ll do it for you. Here is the rap sheets of those Rittenhouse killed and wounded….enjoy reading about your buddies….

This is the hidden content, please

Posted

Everybody seems to agree that a underage kid has the right to take guns across state lines to defend businesses that don’t belong to him or his family after curfew hours. Ok cool but I have another question. Do adults have the right to defend themselves against people breaking in their homes? Even if it unknowingly happens to be the cops breaking in their home? 

Posted
31 minutes ago, Setx fan said:

Everybody seems to agree that a underage kid has the right to take guns across state lines to defend businesses that don’t belong to him or his family after curfew hours. Ok cool but I have another question. Do adults have the right to defend themselves against people breaking in their homes? Even if it unknowingly happens to be the cops breaking in their home? 

He stood trial as an adult, so there goes your underage. The gun did not cross state lines. 
 

When cops have a search warrant for your house, they kick the door down screaming “police” at the top of their lungs. They are not cat burglars. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, baddog said:

1. He stood trial as an adult, so there goes your underage. The gun did not cross state lines. 
 

2. When cops have a search warrant for your house, they kick the door down screaming “police” at the top of their lungs. They are not cat burglars. 

1. He stood trial as an adult and was found not guilty on ALL CHARGES. They even found some type of loophole to get around the the fact that he was an UNDERAGED kid who illegally possessed a firearm. He crossed state lines to go tend to someone else’s business rather the gun crossed with him or not. He illegally possessed a firearm at the time when he ended up shooting people in “self defense”. 
 

2. Cops don’t legally have to anounce themselves when they have a no-knock warrant and sometimes they don’t. Now answer my question. 

Posted
40 minutes ago, Setx fan said:

1. He stood trial as an adult and was found not guilty on ALL CHARGES. They even found some type of loophole to get around the the fact that he was an UNDERAGED kid who illegally possessed a firearm. He crossed state lines to go tend to someone else’s business rather the gun crossed with him or not. He illegally possessed a firearm at the time when he ended up shooting people in “self defense”. 
 

2. Cops don’t legally have to anounce themselves when they have a no-knock warrant and sometimes they don’t. Now answer my question. 

Funny how he is illegal in your eyes, but he can carry a weapon and die for his country at 17 years of age. What is so important about this trial that you want to see this guy hung? Please don’t use the word justice because I know that is not what you seek. (see paragraph below)
 

You’ll have to ask tvc about the police question because I really am not schooled on no-knock warrants. I do know where you are going with this and it comes as no surprise. It’s where every topic eventually leads.

Posted
10 minutes ago, baddog said:

1. Funny how he is illegal in your eyes, but he can carry a weapon and die for his country at 17 years of age. What is so important about this trial that you want to see this guy hung? Please don’t use the word justice because I know that is not what you seek. (see paragraph below)
 

2. You’ll have to ask tvc about the police question because I really am not schooled on no-knock warrants. I do know where you are going with this and it comes as no surprise. It’s where every topic eventually leads.

1. His case doesn’t make much of a difference to me. I just assumed he would face some type of charges for illegal possession. Is it legal for kids under 18 to have guns? I assumed not but maybe I’m wrong

2. My question is not really a “legal” question although I would like to hear tvc and whoever else’s opinion. I’m just asking what you think about the situation in your own moral opinion. 

Posted
14 minutes ago, Setx fan said:

1. His case doesn’t make much of a difference to me. I just assumed he would face some type of charges for illegal possession. Is it legal for kids under 18 to have guns? I assumed not but maybe I’m wrong

2. My question is not really a “legal” question although I would like to hear tvc and whoever else’s opinion. I’m just asking what you think about the situation in your own moral opinion. 

Here’s a question. Do you consider yourself a liberal?

Posted
48 minutes ago, Setx fan said:

No, but what does that have to do with anything? LOL I guess your just not going to answer my question 

Since you are not a liberal, then my next question would have no grounds. To answer your question best I can…..someone breaks into my house while I am in bed gets a Judge fired at them several times. Depending on the time of the break-in and what room I would be in, it could be my .327 federal magnum or my TRR8, whichever is closest. All of my guns are loaded and very deadly, plus I am good with them all.

I think all American kids should have gun knowledge at early ages, even 6 years old. Introduced to guns, taught how deadly they are, taught simple gun safety….etc. I have no problem with “underaged” people carrying a gun. My neighbors shoot guns all the time. It’s legal to shoot out here. As long as they don’t shoot my way, I love it.

Rittenhouse had every right to do what he did, even the killing of two people. Why are there riots after this not guilty verdict, but after the O.J. Simpson verdict there were no riots?

Posted
9 minutes ago, baddog said:

Since you are not a liberal, then my next question would have no grounds. 1. To answer your question best I can…..someone breaks into my house while I am in bed gets a Judge fired at them several times. Depending on the time of the break-in and what room I would be in, it could be my .327 federal magnum or my TRR8, whichever is closest. All of my guns are loaded and very deadly, plus I am good with them all.

I think all American kids should have gun knowledge at early ages, even 6 years old. Introduced to guns, taught how deadly they are, taught simple gun safety….etc. I have no problem with “underaged” people carrying a gun. My neighbors shoot guns all the time. It’s legal to shoot out here. As long as they don’t shoot my way, I love it.

2. Rittenhouse had every right to do what he did, even the killing of two people. Why are there riots after this not guilty verdict, but after the O.J. Simpson verdict there were no riots?

1. LOL Thanx for your honesty. So after you hit em with the magnum or the TRR8 and you find out the guys breaking in your house were actually cops what do you think should happen next? 
 

2. There’s been riots since the Rittenhouse verdict? 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Setx fan said:

1. LOL Thanx for your honesty. So after you hit em with the magnum or the TRR8 and you find out the guys breaking in your house were actually cops what do you think should happen next? 
 

2. There’s been riots since the Rittenhouse verdict? 

I would hate it if it were cops, but it would have to be a mistake on their part because I don’t do anything that would warrant a warrant. Surely the law and justice would figure that one out.

There were riots in Portland and I believe in NYC after this verdict. I think they just like tearing crap up. What else is new with Portland?

Posted
Just now, baddog said:

1. I would hate it if it were cops, but it would have to be a mistake on their part because I don’t do anything that would warrant a warrant. Surely the law and justice would figure that one out.

2. There were riots in Portland after this verdict. I think they just like tearing crap up. What else is new with Portland?

1. Do you think you should be punished for their mistake.

2. Wasn’t aware of the riots but people are just rioting for anything these days 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Setx fan said:

1. Do you think you should be punished for their mistake.

2. Wasn’t aware of the riots but people are just rioting for anything these days 

1. I believe in the justice system and I would be cleared of all charges.

2. 

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

Portland is run by antifa so this is the norm for them.

Posted
2 minutes ago, baddog said:

1. I believe in the justice system and I would be cleared of all charges.

2. 

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

Portland is run by antifa so this is the norm for them.

Marvin Guy has been in jail 7 years for a situation like that. He claims he didn’t know they were cops. I don’t know if he’s telling the truth or not but I dont think it’s right that he’s done 7 years and hasnt even received a trial yet. That type of stuff happens more than you think. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,283
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Malachi
    Newest Member
    Malachi
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...