Jump to content

YMBL TOURNEY/Post updates here


Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, Mballler#1 said:

Silsbee’s first ever win against Dallas Madison they beat us in State some years ago

I remember Silsbee lost to a Dallas team. I thought it was Lincoln, but it could have been Madison. Guard Philbrick Hill was on that Silsbee team. A picture of him and some Dallas player was on the cover of a UIL magazine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, ThaGod409 said:

Need BU to beat down on both of those Dallas teams ! Make a statement! Specially SOC , I believe they in the Lancaster & kimball district 

BU could beat them no doubt,  but teams like Mad & SOC play against so many talented teams on a weekly basis. I doubt seriously if they are overawed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Kountzer said:

BU could beat them no doubt,  but teams like Mad & SOC play against so many talented teams on a weekly basis. I doubt seriously if they are overawed.

Yeah that metroplex is loaded ! & I’m pretty sure everytime a team see “bmt United” they’re feeling the same way (trying to make a statement)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ThaGod409 said:

Need BU to beat down on both of those Dallas teams ! Make a statement! Specially SOC , I believe they in the Lancaster & kimball district 

BU could beat them no doubt,  but teams like Mad & SOC play against so many talented teams on a weekly basis. I doubt seriously if they are intimidated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, BADSANTA said:

Thats what it looks like. Madison has come down and lost to the best teams in SETX. 

Don't many 3A teams get invited to tournaments like this year in and year out.  They got 15 state tournament appearances and 6 or 7 championship trophies. By hook or by crook, they got them and they can't be taken away. I respect that. That kind of history opens doors. The silver lining is they go to district and the 3A playoffs battle tested and ready for another run to the state tournament. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...