Jump to content

Silsbee vs Beaumont United


MikelSR

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Topdawg25 said:

I like where silsbee is heading 

but united again 

with Arceneaux.  By 20 

without arceneaux. By 10 

There's more to lose  than gain playing a less than 100% Arceneaux vs Silsbee. District starts Dec.18 that would be the 

Appropriate time to bring him back. No style points are needed just get the "W"  LoL jmo....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, JustUs said:

Without Arceneaux it'll be another close game especially if those 3's are falling for Silsbee. Again jmo...

Thats just it, in order for it to be close, things have to be working for Silsbee, and we're saying that *considering Arceneaux is out.

Win or lose Silsbee will have nothing to hang its head about 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We benefit from playing Smoke Town too. We get really acclimated to playing a team that plays fast and forces you to play that way the whole game.  No matter how much length we have, you have to be in shape and have great endurance to hang with Silsbee.  Seeing some of the teams Silsbee's beaten, I assume they wasn't so lucky running with the Tigers (West Brook and Summer Creek).    But I do wonder how the heck did yall lose to Dobie?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

We benefit from playing Smoke Town too. We get really acclimated to playing a team that plays fast and forces you to play that way the whole game.  No matter how much length we have, you have to be in shape and have great endurance to hang with Silsbee.  Seeing some of the teams Silsbee's beaten, I assume they wasn't so lucky running with the Tigers (West Brook and Summer Creek).    But I do wonder how the heck did yall lose to Dobie?

Football season ended the day before.  8 players were on that football team including 2 starters and at least 4 of the next 5.  Only 2 football players played at all in that game and they played sparingly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

I don’t think Silsbee gets within 20 of BU.

We will make the adjustments , it was a good to have a feel out game my boys needed that … Don’t think Terrance playing heard from a reliable source he twisted his ankle pretty bad and but we ready if he does play .. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

What teams will be in that LaGrange Tourney?

Silsbee and WO.S and the La Grange team BU beat by 100 is the only 3 I know of. And in the Dobie game the only starter that played was Harris and Sig put in Bottaly for a few minutes in the 3rd and 4th because it was his Birthday. I said after the game we lost by 10 if the starter's play we win by 20.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Who That said:

Silsbee just couldn't get there shots to fall. If they can get that changed and get the shots to fall this could be a shocker. 🤷🏻‍♂️

I wouldn’t say shocker … we not no  cake walk … we known  for winning big games  and expect to win 4 a state this year … a shocker is vidor beating BU  🤷🏿‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Like I said, even if it’s only 10% of the 100 kids BHISD takes from GCCISD each year, that’s 10 athletes per year and that’s being generous.  You’re right about the jobs with BHISD, BTW.  There’s more than 1 athlete from Baytown originally who got transferred to BHISD after a job opened up for Mama.
    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...