Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Striking distance?  Maybe? 

The Maxpreps ranking robot has Silsbee at No. 4 and Washington at No. 9.

They have Connally at No. 6.  So if we beat Connally then Washington should be no problem right?  Yeah, right.

Meanwhile  FF is leading Van Alstyne 44 to 25 at half.  Robo Ranker has Van Alstyne at No. 2.  

Posted
2 minutes ago, JimThorpe said:

Striking distance?  Maybe? 

The Maxpreps ranking robot has Silsbee at No. 4 and Washington at No. 9.

They have Connally at No. 6.  So if we beat Connally then Washington should be no problem right?  Yeah, right.

Meanwhile  FF is leading Van Alstyne 44 to 25 at half.  Robo Ranker has Van Alstyne at No. 2.  

Yeah I was wacthin that Van" is over with..!

Posted
7 minutes ago, BADSANTA said:

Connally is athletic and beat Orangefield pretty good earlier this year so did Silsbee twice. Connally doesn't have a strong schedule overall. 

Exactly if you look at Connally schedule then look at Silsbee's their really isn't any comparison...! Besides Orangefield and Center 

  • AggiesAreWe changed the title to Little Cypress-Mauriceville 65 Houston Washington 89/FINAL
Posted
3 hours ago, BADSANTA said:

No!! Very good yes. You have seen great Silsbee teams. This team has the ability to be great for sure. 

Perfectly stated.  Very good with potential for greatness.  I would say the same for BTW, btw.  (See what I did there?)  

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,283
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Malachi
    Newest Member
    Malachi
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...