Jump to content

Disney World Releases Statement Critical Of PNG’s Orlando Performance!


tvc184

Recommended Posts

38 minutes ago, Aggie521 said:

This is incorrect. They’ve performed the fight song every year they’ve been for the past 15-20 years or so. Wore the headdresses every time. Headdresses were also in the audition tape worn by drum majors. Disney is flat-out lying and trying to save face by throwing PNG under the bus. 

Well, the audition video is out there.  Apparently, the news media has it.  I guess we’ll see when it comes available…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me clear a little up.

Cherokee is only done at the END of the parade route. Another song is played during the parade. The year my daughter went,  I think it was Yellow Rose of Texas or something like that. Us parents gather at the END of the parade, around the circle, and they play Cherokee for us. We've gotten comments on how great it was. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, NDNation said:

Let me clear a little up.

Cherokee is only done at the END of the parade route. Another song is played during the parade. The year my daughter went,  I think it was Yellow Rose of Texas or something like that. Us parents gather at the END of the parade, around the circle, and they play Cherokee for us. We've gotten comments on how great it was. 

Apparently the great comments did not come from the Cherokee chief. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is my take....

If PNG was called the Nazi's and had a guy dress up like Hitler for the mascot, people would assume PNG is racist and supports and worships Nazism and Hitler.  

If PNG was called the Confederate's and had a guy dress up like a confederate solider for the mascot, people would assume PNG is racist and supports Jim Crow laws and stuff.....

But if we insert Indians it's racist and disrespectful.......

How do you buy that with a straight face? Who in the heck would support or dress up for someone they disrespected?  I bet you if I wore a confederate flag t-shirt to a Port Arthur football game, I bet not ONE person would think I was disrespecting the Confederate flag, people or tradition.........

So while PNG was always a rival in football,  and my High School (TJ) was taken away from me......I have to say PNG has the coolest mascot and fight song I have ever seen.......

I believe the motto is "Honor - Tradition - Pride".........How is that disrespectful? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's always funny to me when a bunch of old white men get together and criticize another race/culture for being wrong about believing something.  Personally, I don't have an issue with the idea of an Indian being a mascot, but then again, I'm not Native American.  The fact that so many people on here are pretending to not know that the term Indian is considered offensive by many Native Americans is pretty laughable.  It's also not difficult to understand why native americans would have an issue with an Indian mascot miming scalping.  If there was a high school mascot called the White Men, it wouldn't be offensive, but if during their fight song the white man mascot pantomimed hanging black men, it would be pretty offensive (mostly to white men).   I feel like the conversation on here would be pretty different.  

All that being said, I feel like this is a situation where something that is probably minorly offensive to some native americans is being blown way out of proportion by the woke left and media.  Both sides are wrong here: the folks with the "it's always been this way" or the "Native Americans shouldn't care how we portray Native Americans" points of view, and also the woke side who's exploiting the situation for political gain, or getting worked up without having any dog in the fight.  

For me personally, if I were doing anything at all that portrayed someone from another race or culture in a way that led parts of that group to claim it was offensive, I would stop doing it.  It seems amazingly selfish to continue the behavior for your own edification.  It's kind of an ironic deal that some Native Americans don't like the portrayal of themselves, and a community of white people refuses to change because of "culture and tradition."  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 5GallonBucket said:

new chiefs words

“offensive imagery, chanting, symbolism”

“does nothing but dishonor us and all Native American tribes “

Sounds like this new chief has forgotten the history and traditions of his past ancestors.

scalps was a means to war honors in most Native American tribes…

he must be the new WOKE chief

this in no way has dishonored the Native American tribes.

 

 

And you speak for the tribe, not the chief ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, bullets13 said:

It's always funny to me when a bunch of old white men get together and criticize another race/culture for being wrong about believing something.  Personally, I don't have an issue with the idea of an Indian being a mascot, but then again, I'm not Native American.  The fact that so many people on here are pretending to not know that the term Indian is considered offensive by many Native Americans is pretty laughable.  It's also not difficult to understand why native americans would have an issue with an Indian mascot miming scalping.  If there was a high school mascot called the White Men, it wouldn't be offensive, but if during their fight song the white man mascot pantomimed hanging black men, it would be pretty offensive (mostly to white men).   I feel like the conversation on here would be pretty different.  

All that being said, I feel like this is a situation where something that is probably minorly offensive to some native americans is being blown way out of proportion by the woke left and media.  Both sides are wrong here: the folks with the "it's always been this way" or the "Native Americans shouldn't care how we portray Native Americans" points of view, and also the woke side who's exploiting the situation for political gain, or getting worked up without having any dog in the fight.  

For me personally, if I were doing anything at all that portrayed someone from another race or culture in a way that led parts of that group to claim it was offensive, I would stop doing it.  It seems amazingly selfish to continue the behavior for your own edification.  It's kind of an ironic deal that some Native Americans don't like the portrayal of themselves, and a community of white people refuses to change because of "culture and tradition."  

Like I said previously, I don’t care what they call themselves. It doesn’t bother me. I would just look at it through another set of eyes before making a decision. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, bullets13 said:

It's always funny to me when a bunch of old white men get together and criticize another race/culture for being wrong about believing something.  Personally, I don't have an issue with the idea of an Indian being a mascot, but then again, I'm not Native American.  The fact that so many people on here are pretending to not know that the term Indian is considered offensive by many Native Americans is pretty laughable.  It's also not difficult to understand why native americans would have an issue with an Indian mascot miming scalping.  If there was a high school mascot called the White Men, it wouldn't be offensive, but if during their fight song the white man mascot pantomimed hanging black men, it would be pretty offensive (mostly to white men).   I feel like the conversation on here would be pretty different.  

All that being said, I feel like this is a situation where something that is probably minorly offensive to some native americans is being blown way out of proportion by the woke left and media.  Both sides are wrong here: the folks with the "it's always been this way" or the "Native Americans shouldn't care how we portray Native Americans" points of view, and also the woke side who's exploiting the situation for political gain, or getting worked up without having any dog in the fight.  

For me personally, if I were doing anything at all that portrayed someone from another race or culture in a way that led parts of that group to claim it was offensive, I would stop doing it.  It seems amazingly selfish to continue the behavior for your own edification.  It's kind of an ironic deal that some Native Americans don't like the portrayal of themselves, and a community of white people refuses to change because of "culture and tradition."  

The best post on this thread!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, SmashMouth said:

Like I said previously, I don’t care what they call themselves. It doesn’t bother me. I would just look at it through another set of eyes before making a decision. 

I don’t either, but to give Disney, who doesn’t care about this one way or another and has a history of racist cartoons over the years, any consideration on this is laughable.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, bullets13 said:

It's always funny to me when a bunch of old white men get together and criticize another race/culture for being wrong about believing something.  Personally, I don't have an issue with the idea of an Indian being a mascot, but then again, I'm not Native American.  The fact that so many people on here are pretending to not know that the term Indian is considered offensive by many Native Americans is pretty laughable.  It's also not difficult to understand why native americans would have an issue with an Indian mascot miming scalping.  If there was a high school mascot called the White Men, it wouldn't be offensive, but if during their fight song the white man mascot pantomimed hanging black men, it would be pretty offensive (mostly to white men).   I feel like the conversation on here would be pretty different.  

All that being said, I feel like this is a situation where something that is probably minorly offensive to some native americans is being blown way out of proportion by the woke left and media.  Both sides are wrong here: the folks with the "it's always been this way" or the "Native Americans shouldn't care how we portray Native Americans" points of view, and also the woke side who's exploiting the situation for political gain, or getting worked up without having any dog in the fight.  

For me personally, if I were doing anything at all that portrayed someone from another race or culture in a way that led parts of that group to claim it was offensive, I would stop doing it.  It seems amazingly selfish to continue the behavior for your own edification.  It's kind of an ironic deal that some Native Americans don't like the portrayal of themselves, and a community of white people refuses to change because of "culture and tradition."  

Good post.

I can agree with this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

I don’t either, but to give Disney, who doesn’t care about this one way or another and has a history of racist cartoons over the years, any consideration on this is laughable.

 

Agreed. I was not considering Disney whatsoever. More looking at the actual folks who may or may not have been harmed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, 5GallonBucket said:

new chiefs words

“offensive imagery, chanting, symbolism”

“does nothing but dishonor us and all Native American tribes “

Sounds like this new chief has forgotten the history and traditions of his past ancestors.

scalps was a means to war honors in most Native American tribes

he must be the new WOKE chief

this in no way has dishonored the Native American tribes.

 

 

It used to be “honorable” to own and abuse slaves.  I don’t think it’s necessarily “woke” to not want your culture portrayed by the most brutal, savage acts that your people ever committed.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, bullets13 said:

Seminole is not a derogatory term.  Many Native Americans feel that Indians is 

At what point, and who decided it was offensive?  When I was in elementary school learning about the first Thanksgiving, it wasn’t Pilgrims and Native Americans, it was Indians.  Woke mentality run amuck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that the whole situation is sad.  With all of the problems facing our Native American population, their leaders decide to put all of their efforts into this instead of poverty, drug addiction, violence, illiteracy, poor health, and any other of a host of ACTUAL PROBLEMS facing their community today.

What has changed since the 1970s when the Cherokees were proud to be honored as the PNG mascot?  Nothing in PNG.... they're still doing it the same way.  The only difference is a embarrassing decline in leadership by the Cherokee Nation.  

BUT, I could see a time in the next five years where schools like PNG and Evadale will be banned from UIL participation if they don't change their mascots to accommodate the wishes of the far left.  I'd bank on it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,207
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined



  • Posts

    • LaPoyner 46 Buna 37 6:17 4th Buna was down 20 or so, but are on a run.
    • Bessent joined  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  (SFM) in 1991 and was a partner there throughout the 1990s, eventually becoming head of the London office. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  In 1992, Bessent was a leading member of the team whose bet on the  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  collapse of the British  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up garnered over $1 billion for the firm. His bet against the Japanese  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  in 2013 brought additional profit. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up After resigning from SFM in 2000, Bessent founded a $1 billion hedge fund. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  The fund closed in 2005. Bessent has said he learned that he should not change his style or the construct of the firm because of investor preferences. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  He was also a senior investment advisor at fund-of-funds  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up . This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  Bessent returned to Soros Fund Management and was chief investment officer from 2011 to 2015. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  He left in 2015 to begin a new firm, Key Square Group. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Key Square Group Bessent founded Key Square Group in 2015 with Michael Germino, who had been the global head of capital markets at SFM. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  Key Square uses  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  and economics to make macro investments. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  Key Square received a $2 billion anchor investment from  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up . This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  At the end of 2017, Key Square's assets were $5.1 billion. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  Key Square's main fund returns increased by 13% in 2016 but lost money or broke even every year from 2017 to 2021 before making major gains in 2021, 2022 and 2023. The inconsistent track record scared away clients. Assets under management shrank from $5.1 billion in 2017 to $577 million in 2023 and the number of institutional investors declined from 180 to 20 over the same period. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up As part of a pre-arranged deal, the firm returned in 2018 the Soros capital as it took in other assets. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  Its investors include Australia's sovereign wealth fund,  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up . This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • Uh oh MAGAS, any issues with this? Scott Bessent Seems to be textbook deep state with the soros affiliation.    Bond markets, and my investment accounts,  are liking the pick so far with rates down as investors breathe a sigh of relief. Reportedly he will take a softer approach to tariffs, which are inflationary and pass throughs to consumers, as all 1.5 of us on SETX know 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...