Jump to content

We Cannot Have a Supreme Court Justice Who Thinks Constitution Is Racist!!


Reagan

Recommended Posts

Mitch McConnell Accuses S.C Diversity Nominee Jackson Of 'Evasive And Unclear' Answers In Confirmation Hearings!  

This is a good sign!  I think this is turning out to be an easy decision!  She wants on the high court to make tough decisions -- but she don't even know what a "woman" is.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Democrats Call Republican Senators Racist for Treating Ketanji Jackson Like Everyone Else! 

From the article:  "Professional race-baiter Elie Mystal wrote a piece for The Nation in which he predicted Republicans are going to do all kinds of racisms to keep Jackson from being appointed to the Supreme Court. He wrote:  And yet. Republicans are still going to Republican. Even if they can’t stop Ketanji Brown Jackson, they’re going to engage in all manner of nastiness, just to rile up their racist, violent base. Republicans demonize Black people because it makes them money, and their attacks on Jackson will be repeated in fundraising material all across the country. Here then is an overview of what to watch out for over the next few days during the confirmation hearings."

Things must be starting to get bad for her.  Because when they start to lose the argument -- they start with failed racism ploy!

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This shouldn’t have to be said, but if you don’t know what a women is, you shouldn’t be in any position of responsibility — let alone decide the fate of the Republic from our nation’s highest court.

At this point she’s barely qualified to be on a Kangaroo Court.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can someone tell me how a Supreme Court justice that can’t define what a woman is is supposed to interpret the 19th Amendment?

Today the SCOTUS nominee said she can’t define a woman because she’s not a biologist. So it begs the question: How do we know if Joe actually nominated a female person of color? And….If you can’t define gender then how can you define skin color?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Unwoke said:

Can someone tell me how a Supreme Court justice that can’t define what a woman is is supposed to interpret the 19th Amendment?

Today the SCOTUS nominee said she can’t define a woman because she’s not a biologist. So it begs the question: How do we know if Joe actually nominated a female person of color? And….If you can’t define gender then how can you define skin color?

So, if she doesn’t know if she is a woman or not, how in the hell can she decide cases on the SC?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,207
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined



  • Posts

    • RWG Stem vs Liberty Magnet tips off in 5 minutes in the main gym.
    • REL actually improved this year to 6-4 which was remarkable because like you said, they had a lot of injuries and their bench was thin before that.  It’s crazy how the smallest of the 3 GCCISD High Schools finds a way to at least field a team that can hold their own but you’re right that coaching is one aspect of it.  Not that they’re a top 150 team or even close to it but if they’d lost a couple less guys there’s a real chance they could have beat Texas City and gone to at least the 1st round of playoffs this year which for GCCISD football might as well be State for how hard it is for them.   You’re spot-on about GCM and RSS coaches.  GCM coach is 2-28 over 3 years and RSS coach is 15-45 over 6.  Hard to get kids to participate in what they know from the outset is a losing proposition.  I watched the GCM/NS Game.  I was worried someone would get hurt, felt sick.  All 22 of NS starters are high level D1 Commits, QB is 19 years old, and GCM lined up a bunch of Sophomores against them, kids that aren’t even old enough to drive.     I know GCCISD wouldn’t ever do it but they really ought to stop insisting that the 3 High Schools play each other for their first 2 out of conference games.  At least let GCM out of it.  All 3 schools are in different Classifications so the wins don’t matter except for bragging rights around town and with REL winning both those games every season all it does is kill morale before the first District game is even played.  Let GCM schedule some OOC games on their level like Houston Sterling/Sam Houston/Chavez for their first 3.  That way there’s a good chance even if they lose every District game they could end up 3-7 and if they beat Channelview 4-6.  GCM having to lose to RSS and REL to start their season every year is just a killer.   You want to know why all the talent at EF Green Jr doesn’t show up at GCM?  Because that talent transfers to North Shore after 8th grade is done.  Straight-up.  They don’t care if you know either.  Those kids moms get on Facebook and brag about it.  Of course, most of those kids end up so far back on the depth chart that by Sophomore year they want to transfer back just so they can get to play at all but then you run into the eligibility thing.    Anyway, sorry for the off-topic tangent, this is a BH thread.  
    • They are very good. Really good shooting guard that's '6"3. Also have a do it all forward that's '6"5. He does everything for them. Score, rebound, defend. Maybe not as quick overall as those other teams, but I think they will at least make state semifinals.
    • Brookeland is playing Frankston in Aux gym. Game started at 1pm  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...