Jump to content

We Cannot Have a Supreme Court Justice Who Thinks Constitution Is Racist!!


Reagan

Recommended Posts

Mitch McConnell Accuses S.C Diversity Nominee Jackson Of 'Evasive And Unclear' Answers In Confirmation Hearings!  

This is a good sign!  I think this is turning out to be an easy decision!  She wants on the high court to make tough decisions -- but she don't even know what a "woman" is.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Democrats Call Republican Senators Racist for Treating Ketanji Jackson Like Everyone Else! 

From the article:  "Professional race-baiter Elie Mystal wrote a piece for The Nation in which he predicted Republicans are going to do all kinds of racisms to keep Jackson from being appointed to the Supreme Court. He wrote:  And yet. Republicans are still going to Republican. Even if they can’t stop Ketanji Brown Jackson, they’re going to engage in all manner of nastiness, just to rile up their racist, violent base. Republicans demonize Black people because it makes them money, and their attacks on Jackson will be repeated in fundraising material all across the country. Here then is an overview of what to watch out for over the next few days during the confirmation hearings."

Things must be starting to get bad for her.  Because when they start to lose the argument -- they start with failed racism ploy!

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This shouldn’t have to be said, but if you don’t know what a women is, you shouldn’t be in any position of responsibility — let alone decide the fate of the Republic from our nation’s highest court.

At this point she’s barely qualified to be on a Kangaroo Court.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can someone tell me how a Supreme Court justice that can’t define what a woman is is supposed to interpret the 19th Amendment?

Today the SCOTUS nominee said she can’t define a woman because she’s not a biologist. So it begs the question: How do we know if Joe actually nominated a female person of color? And….If you can’t define gender then how can you define skin color?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Unwoke said:

Can someone tell me how a Supreme Court justice that can’t define what a woman is is supposed to interpret the 19th Amendment?

Today the SCOTUS nominee said she can’t define a woman because she’s not a biologist. So it begs the question: How do we know if Joe actually nominated a female person of color? And….If you can’t define gender then how can you define skin color?

So, if she doesn’t know if she is a woman or not, how in the hell can she decide cases on the SC?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,202
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    CHSFalcon
    Newest Member
    CHSFalcon
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...