Jump to content

Trump To Be President In 2023?!


Reagan

Recommended Posts

There's a scenario that's being bantered around that could "legally" put Donald Trump in as President sometime in 2023.  Here's how it goes:  Again, let me start out by saying that this is all Constitutional.  Ok, the Republicans would have to take over the House and Senate in 2022.  Which, as it appears now, is very likely.  There is no doubt on my mind that on day one the House will start impeachment hearings against Joebama.  But, with the scenario concerning Trump, the House will add Harris to the impeachment situation.  Impeach and removal will be the goal.  Now, this is where Trump comes in.  How many people realize that one DOES NOT have to be a member of Congress to be Speaker?  So, with that being said, they would name Trump Speaker.  Once The President and VP is removed, then Trump becomes President sometime in 2023!  Again -- all legal and Constitutional.  

Now, the question is, how bad does it have to get before something like this becomes reality?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Reagan said:

There's a scenario that's being bantered around that could "legally" put Donald Trump in as President sometime in 2023.  Here's how it goes:  Again, let me start out by saying that this is all Constitutional.  Ok, the Republicans would have to take over the House and Senate in 2022.  Which, as it appears now, is very likely.  There is no doubt on my mind that on day one the House will start impeachment hearings against Joebama.  But, with the scenario concerning Trump, the House will add Harris to the impeachment situation.  Impeach and removal will be the goal.  Now, this is where Trump comes in.  How many people realize that one DOES NOT have to be a member of Congress to be Speaker?  So, with that being said, they would name Trump Speaker.  Once The President and VP is removed, then Trump becomes President sometime in 2023!  Again -- all legal and Constitutional.  

Now, the question is, how bad does it have to get before something like this becomes reality?  

It's pretty bad right now so . . . 🤔

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Reagan said:

There's a scenario that's being bantered around that could "legally" put Donald Trump in as President sometime in 2023.  Here's how it goes:  Again, let me start out by saying that this is all Constitutional.  Ok, the Republicans would have to take over the House and Senate in 2022.  Which, as it appears now, is very likely.  There is no doubt on my mind that on day one the House will start impeachment hearings against Joebama.  But, with the scenario concerning Trump, the House will add Harris to the impeachment situation.  Impeach and removal will be the goal.  Now, this is where Trump comes in.  How many people realize that one DOES NOT have to be a member of Congress to be Speaker?  So, with that being said, they would name Trump Speaker.  Once The President and VP is removed, then Trump becomes President sometime in 2023!  Again -- all legal and Constitutional.  

Now, the question is, how bad does it have to get before something like this becomes reality?  

Better have a 2/3 majority in the senate for a conviction, or a few back-stabbing democrats. They’re already back-stabbers, just not sure how eager they are to stab one of their own. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dumb crap like this is the reason that moderates won't vote Republican.

 

If you really believe that Republicans can just usurp the election process and install whoever they want, you obviously weren't paying attention during Government class as a senior. 

I'll also guarantee that if by some stupid chance we DID have a Congress foolish enough to try, you'd have a civil war on your hands.  

 

The level of stupidity here is mind-blowing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

Dumb crap like this is the reason that moderates won't vote Republican.

 

If you really believe that Republicans can just usurp the election process and install whoever they want, you obviously weren't paying attention during Government class as a senior. 

I'll also guarantee that if by some stupid chance we DID have a Congress foolish enough to try, you'd have a civil war on your hands.  

 

The level of stupidity here is mind-blowing.

You shouldn’t call people stupid. They might get offended. It’s more like wishful thinking. I see nothing wrong with that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

Dumb crap like this is the reason that moderates won't vote Republican.

 

If you really believe that Republicans can just usurp the election process and install whoever they want, you obviously weren't paying attention during Government class as a senior. 

I'll also guarantee that if by some stupid chance we DID have a Congress foolish enough to try, you'd have a civil war on your hands.  

 

The level of stupidity here is mind-blowing.

Isn’t that what the Democrats did with the MASSIVE ELECTION FRAUD in 2020? There was a whole lot USURPING going by the DEMOCRATS and CHINA in 2020! 
The media has had a tough time covering up Hunter’s Laptop from Hell and the Massive Election Fraud😂. Russia Hoax a Big Lie, Hunter’s Laptop not being Authentic a Big Lie, No signs of Voter Fraud another Big Lie. 😂 Conspiracy Theorist keep getting it right! 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

Dumb crap like this is the reason that moderates won't vote Republican.

 

If you really believe that Republicans can just usurp the election process and install whoever they want, you obviously weren't paying attention during Government class as a senior. 

I'll also guarantee that if by some stupid chance we DID have a Congress foolish enough to try, you'd have a civil war on your hands.  

 

The level of stupidity here is mind-blowing.

Well, the Constitution allows for this situation.  In what situation would be acceptable for you?  

BTW, what part was I wrong on?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Unwoke said:

He’s gone to take his TDS medication…he’ll be back.😂

Ha!  Yea, that's usually the case.  Easily triggered.  LOL.

But the hard part would be getting the 2/3's needed for removal.  We could, no doubt, get both impeached.  If it looks like we had the votes for removal, then we proceed.  If not, then we don't.  Pretty easy decision.  That's why I ended with "how bad does it have to get before something like this becomes reality?"  If things are REALLY bad then maybe we get a few Dem Senators?  Would be interesting to see play out.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

Dumb crap like this is the reason that moderates won't vote Republican.

 

If you really believe that Republicans can just usurp the election process and install whoever they want, you obviously weren't paying attention during Government class as a senior. 

I'll also guarantee that if by some stupid chance we DID have a Congress foolish enough to try, you'd have a civil war on your hands.  

 

The level of stupidity here is mind-blowing.

And look what it gets you….so whose the dumb one now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

Dumb crap like this is the reason that moderates won't vote Republican.

 

If you really believe that Republicans can just usurp the election process and install whoever they want, you obviously weren't paying attention during Government class as a senior. 

I'll also guarantee that if by some stupid chance we DID have a Congress foolish enough to try, you'd have a civil war on your hands.  

 

The level of stupidity here is mind-blowing.

Yea, that’s it, moderates never vote for dumb stuff.

lol

image.jpeg.63519c58a46e765cacc5244b69c337c5.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Reagan said:

Ha!  Yea, that's usually the case.  Easily triggered.  LOL.

But the hard part would be getting the 2/3's needed for removal.  We could, no doubt, get both impeached.  If it looks like we had the votes for removal, then we proceed.  If not, then we don't.  Pretty easy decision.  That's why I ended with "how bad does it have to get before something like this becomes reality?"  If things are REALLY bad then maybe we get a few Dem Senators?  Would be interesting to see play out.  

Just because you “have the votes” doesn’t mean you should do it. That’s what happened the first time that trump was impeached. Is Biden a terrible President? No doubt. Is he reasonably guilty of any “high crimes or misdemeanors?” Not by any evidence I’ve seen. Americans don’t want more of the same crap. They dont want more partisan rancor and endless hearings in the House. The worst thing that the Rs could do is to start some stupid Impeachment just because “they have the votes.”  
 

“But Trump could be the Speaker of the House.” It would never happen, even if it’s what Rudy, Marjorie, the Pillow Man, and a bunch of red-hatted fools get chubbies dreaming of.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Reagan said:

Well, the Constitution allows for this situation.  In what situation would be acceptable for you?  

BTW, what part was I wrong on?

The part where you believe that it is even remotely possible that maybe 12-15 Democrat senators will play along. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

Dumb crap like this is the reason that moderates won't vote Republican.

If you really believe that Republicans can just usurp the election process and install whoever they want, you obviously weren't paying attention during Government class as a senior. 

I'll also guarantee that if by some stupid chance we DID have a Congress foolish enough to try, you'd have a civil war on your hands.  

The level of stupidity here is mind-blowing.

So will the moderates not vote Democrat since that is exactly what the Dems did for 4 years including trying to impeach Trump after he had lost the election and within days of him leaving office? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, tvc184 said:

So will the moderates not vote Democrat since that is exactly what the Dems did for 4 years including trying to impeach Trump after he had lost the election and within days of him leaving office? 

I think that Trump would easily have won in 2020 partly because of the first Impeachment if he'd have just not been willfully repulsive to anybody but his most loyal followers.  The second impeachment was rightful in regards to having grounds.... the timing issue is a completely different story.  

 

As we're now looking down the barrel of another failed Trump Presidential campaign, I think Rs might regret not voting along with Romney in the Senate for the second Impeachment before it's all over.  

 

The people who keep squawking "yeah, but no mean tweets, huh?" have failed to grasp what happened in 2020.  There was no election fraud.  It's been conclusively proven that it never happened.  Anybody who still believes that the election was stolen is literally a flat earther. More people hated Trump than liked Biden.  That hasn't changed.  If you had to ask the people who voted against Trump if they'd take him back now that gas prices are high, inflation is amok, and the whole shebang looks like it is coming off of the rails, every single one of those 81 million voters would say "no, eff that guy." 

 

They still hate him (understandably so) and nothing will change that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Reagan said:

True.  But it's a subject by subject situation.  

AKA- i'm totally okay with republicans making a mockery of political process and democracy to usurp power, but if the left does it then it's time for a war.  the right likes to claim superiority over the left when it comes to behavior, but then tries to justify crap like this with examples from the left.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/24/2022 at 7:28 AM, Reagan said:

There's a scenario that's being bantered around that could "legally" put Donald Trump in as President sometime in 2023.  Here's how it goes:  Again, let me start out by saying that this is all Constitutional.  Ok, the Republicans would have to take over the House and Senate in 2022.  Which, as it appears now, is very likely.  There is no doubt on my mind that on day one the House will start impeachment hearings against Joebama.  But, with the scenario concerning Trump, the House will add Harris to the impeachment situation.  Impeach and removal will be the goal.  Now, this is where Trump comes in.  How many people realize that one DOES NOT have to be a member of Congress to be Speaker?  So, with that being said, they would name Trump Speaker.  Once The President and VP is removed, then Trump becomes President sometime in 2023!  Again -- all legal and Constitutional.  

Now, the question is, how bad does it have to get before something like this becomes reality?  

where's your source that this would be "legal."  this looks an awful lot like something someone would find on a viral fb meme.  also, like cardinal stated, what crime would the republican controlled house and senate be impeaching Biden and Harris for?  Ineffectiveness isn't a crime.  being terrible at your job isn't a crime.  being a democrat isn't a crime.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,207
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined



  • Posts

    • LaPoyner 46 Buna 37 6:17 4th Buna was down 20 or so, but are on a run.
    • Bessent joined  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  (SFM) in 1991 and was a partner there throughout the 1990s, eventually becoming head of the London office. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  In 1992, Bessent was a leading member of the team whose bet on the  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  collapse of the British  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up garnered over $1 billion for the firm. His bet against the Japanese  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  in 2013 brought additional profit. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up After resigning from SFM in 2000, Bessent founded a $1 billion hedge fund. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  The fund closed in 2005. Bessent has said he learned that he should not change his style or the construct of the firm because of investor preferences. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  He was also a senior investment advisor at fund-of-funds  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up . This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  Bessent returned to Soros Fund Management and was chief investment officer from 2011 to 2015. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  He left in 2015 to begin a new firm, Key Square Group. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Key Square Group Bessent founded Key Square Group in 2015 with Michael Germino, who had been the global head of capital markets at SFM. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  Key Square uses  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  and economics to make macro investments. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  Key Square received a $2 billion anchor investment from  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up . This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  At the end of 2017, Key Square's assets were $5.1 billion. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  Key Square's main fund returns increased by 13% in 2016 but lost money or broke even every year from 2017 to 2021 before making major gains in 2021, 2022 and 2023. The inconsistent track record scared away clients. Assets under management shrank from $5.1 billion in 2017 to $577 million in 2023 and the number of institutional investors declined from 180 to 20 over the same period. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up As part of a pre-arranged deal, the firm returned in 2018 the Soros capital as it took in other assets. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  Its investors include Australia's sovereign wealth fund,  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up . This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • Uh oh MAGAS, any issues with this? Scott Bessent Seems to be textbook deep state with the soros affiliation.    Bond markets, and my investment accounts,  are liking the pick so far with rates down as investors breathe a sigh of relief. Reportedly he will take a softer approach to tariffs, which are inflationary and pass throughs to consumers, as all 1.5 of us on SETX know 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...