Hagar Posted April 4, 2022 Report Posted April 4, 2022 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Same Biden who blames Putin for War Crimes. Why Joe? Putin didn’t slaughter those civilians, guns did. In California, which has some of the strictest gun laws in the US, you blame the guns, not the shooters. You poor goober headed loon. Quote
tvc184 Posted April 5, 2022 Report Posted April 5, 2022 Yes, because we know that better laws would have stopped this… Quote
bullets13 Posted April 5, 2022 Report Posted April 5, 2022 It happened in a state with some of the strictest gun laws in the country. This is obviously the result of a fight between two idiots with guns, not a targeted mass shooting. I'd bet the mortgage that both of the shooters have multiple previous arrests, but were let off lightly due to Cali's soft approach on criminals. There's also a high likelihood that they're convicted felons who were already breaking gun laws by possessing guns of any kind, and yet for some reason the laws didn't stop them. Reagan 1 Quote
Unwoke Posted April 5, 2022 Report Posted April 5, 2022 21 minutes ago, bullets13 said: It happened in a state with some of the strictest gun laws in the country. This is obviously the result of a fight between two idiots with guns, not a targeted mass shooting. I'd bet the mortgage that both of the shooters have multiple previous arrests, but were let off lightly due to Cali's soft approach on criminals. There's also a high likelihood that they're convicted felons who were already breaking gun laws by possessing guns of any kind, and yet for some reason the laws didn't stop them. Maybe they’ll blame it on the gun like Alec Baldwin. Quote
bullets13 Posted April 5, 2022 Report Posted April 5, 2022 4 hours ago, bullets13 said: It happened in a state with some of the strictest gun laws in the country. This is obviously the result of a fight between two idiots with guns, not a targeted mass shooting. I'd bet the mortgage that both of the shooters have multiple previous arrests, but were let off lightly due to Cali's soft approach on criminals. There's also a high likelihood that they're convicted felons who were already breaking gun laws by possessing guns of any kind, and yet for some reason the laws didn't stop them. About one of the suspects: Martin was freed from an Arizona prison in 2020 after serving just over 1 1/2 years for violating probation in separate cases involving a felony conviction for aggravated assault in 2016 and a conviction on a marijuana charge in 2018. Court records show he pleaded guilty to punching, kicking and choking a woman in a hotel room when she refused to work for him as a prostitute. Quote
Ty Cobb Posted April 5, 2022 Report Posted April 5, 2022 There's no need for more gun control laws. What we need is culture control laws. This is about one of the shooters: Smiley Martin, 27, was taken into custody Tuesday morning as he recovered at a hospital from injuries suffered during the gunfire that broke out in the This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up capital's entertainment district early Sunday morning, the Sacramento Police Department said. Martin faces charges of possession of a firearm by a prohibited person and possession of a machine gun. These thugs didn't follow the existing gun laws, what makes Brandon think they would follow new ones. Quote
tvc184 Posted April 6, 2022 Report Posted April 6, 2022 5 hours ago, Ty Cobb said: There's no need for more gun control laws. What we need is culture control laws. This is about one of the shooters: Smiley Martin, 27, was taken into custody Tuesday morning as he recovered at a hospital from injuries suffered during the gunfire that broke out in the This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up capital's entertainment district early Sunday morning, the Sacramento Police Department said. Martin faces charges of possession of a firearm by a prohibited person and possession of a machine gun. These thugs didn't follow the existing gun laws, what makes Brandon think they would follow new ones. Here is one of the most stupid rationales about gun laws and in particular gun free zones to stop mass shootings. I have brought this up in various forums several times and maybe this one. If a person is about to kill multiple people, he is facing: 1. Death during the incident by suicide or the police. 2. if he survives: a. Life in prison. b. Death Penalty. There are no other outcomes. I guess there’s a possibility of escape but that is about 99.999% unlikely. If a person is facing certain death or life in prison, what penalty can you threaten him with? “Let’s see, I am mad at the I’m going to indiscriminately kill as many people as I can, hopefully dozens at least!! Then I will kill myself but wait… this is a gun free zone. Oh well maybe I’ll just go get me a Dr Pepper milk shake at Whataburger.” All that gun free zones do is keep people from defending themselves. Ty Cobb 1 Quote
baddog Posted April 6, 2022 Report Posted April 6, 2022 6 hours ago, Unwoke said: 31 more if you are Obama. lol Quote
Unwoke Posted April 8, 2022 Report Posted April 8, 2022 Lead poisoning can be deadly! You go girl!!👏👏👏 Quote
Reagan Posted April 8, 2022 Report Posted April 8, 2022 26 minutes ago, Unwoke said: Lead poisoning can be deadly! You go girl!!👏👏👏 Excellent!!!! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.